We can all do something to help him... We can all mentalize and send him the good energy of our intentions and desires that he and everyone in his family are well and strong, we can ask "the Whole", "God", "Allah", what you believe be the creative source of everything, that is with them and this same energy, power that is in us too, will be with them, strengthening them and soon it will be here with us. "Where We Go One, We Go All" #WWG1WGA Good Computing for All. Best Regards. @JeepWillys58
we could also visit msmg help him with the farm and he could update toolkit while we're taking care of chickens cows horses, planting things, driving tractors around, i believe msmg is in india right ? always wanted to visit india but never did.
I really don't know where he lives, but if I had the means to go there and help, I would definitely go, besides enjoying dealing with these things you mentioned, it would be an excellent opportunity to learn another culture, exchange good energy and in addition to helping them , also being able to become a better person, sharing the table, the effort, the gratitude for being here and learning from others is much more than rewarding. Regards
How can I get all of the language packs for Windows 7? All that the Packs\LanguagePacks\w7\x64 folder has is this.
%SelectedSourceOS% in the code seems to be defaulting to "\" for some reason. It should be "w7". %PackageServicePackBuild% seems to be just an empty string, and somehow deleting "6.1.7601". Just for context, this is Windows 7 RTM, which isn't supported. Will upgrading Windows 7 to SP1 before applying language packs be safe?
I'm sorry I didn't see this question. I don't know. You said that your autounattend solves a problem by removing the "CloudExperienceHost" component. What I saw different in your autounattend that can be changed when creating the autounattend using the Toolkit is the order I mentioned. I even find it interesting that you do the tests, as you have the exact environment, and the exact modifications you made to your ISO. Therefore, there is no room for someone else to carry out the test, creating an ISO that would give us different results, but which will leave that doubt in our heads saying: "were the procedures the same as those that Haris did?".
I'd already have a discussion with @MSMG about this issue(Blank screen) long time ago, either it is related to 'CloudExperienceHost' or 'UndockedDevKit component when removed from an offline image,', not remember correctly which component cause this, even @MSMG encountered the same in his testing.
Not the way you show with the sysprep folder, because you will only point to an Edition Index in the unattend.xml file. If it were possible to integrate unattend within each index, in the panther folder or something like that, it would be possible, as you could choose which edition to install. But the unattend.xml created within panther is recreated based on the autounattend.xml available in the iso. So, no issues. Now that you say it, I remember that. Thnks for testing it!
hi all, could someone tell me if msmg toolkit v13.6 works with the folowing windows iso file? en-gb_windows_10_enterprise_2015_ltsb_x64_dvd_6848456.iso and this iso? en-gb_windows_10_enterprise_ltsc_2021_x64_dvd_7fe51fe8.iso no updates have been added. thank you for your answers in advance everyone. Majid
I know it supports 19044.1288 LTSC 2021, if this is an original ISO, it must be this 19044.1288. All original "LTSC 2021" ISOs came with ghost sfc error. So it's not a Toolkit problem. You do not need to remove components from the "Windows Apps" menu (this is the 8th menu). These components are not present in LTSC. With the latest Toolkit changes, I don't know if some of the new components added to the ToolkitHelper "Windows Apps Menu" for removal, are present in LTSC 2021. Maybe someone knows more about this and can respond more appropriately.
I think you didn't go through my unattend.xml in the previous post; it's meant only for the OOBE phase of Windows OS installation. Regarding the Sysprep folder, I tried the following path: /sources/$OEM$/$$/Panther/, but I encountered an error during installation. That's why I've provided the below path for unattend.xml: /sources/$OEM$/$$/System32/Sysprep/. I suggest you test it yourself with a multi-edition ISO. Yup, order doesn't matter.
@inTerActionVRI thank you so much for your swift reply! if i'm onist with you, the only 2 people whomes opiniuns I currently trust are yours and @haris_mdlf69 i'm not that fussed with user app removal to be fare, am more interested in system app removal this image will be used in a vm you see, so updateability of the image I don't care about at all. so if it's possible windows update component will cirtenly be removed. the reason I asked about ltsb 2015, is it uses less system resources. I am not fussed about serviceability, updateability or if an image is supported by ms or not. just need a windows platform that is speedy fast for what I need. latter versions of windows are laggy sluggish etc. my machine is from 2013, it has 750 gb hdd, 8gb of system ram in full. and an i3 processer with 4 cores. hence me trying to slim crop speed up an image for my usecase. I thought I would tell you why I was asking. I will install sed image using a talking windows pe due to removal of accessibility. I may just apply the .wim to the disk of the vm.