.NET Framework 3.5 Standalone Installer for Windows 10

I tested the new "dotNetFx35_WX_10_x86_x64_u" install package on 25H2
It worked only after changing this line in the cmd file
I hope this will be fixed in the next release
@abbodi1406

 

Much appreciated

 

Hi @abbodi1406

Could you please add Windows Server 2022 (build 20348) into the package? Thank you very much~

 

Nb I am the author of the script

For windows server ? Use dism .... with net framework source from iso/usb of server 2022

CMD script to install .NET Framework 3.5 on Windows Server 2022 using a mounted ISO, without downloading files from Windows Update.

Save code as netfx3.5.bat script works for any server 2008 r2 up to 2025 and windows 8 up to 11

Nb replace ISO=D with drive letter like D or others

If drive are E become ISO=E

Code:

@echo off
setlocal EnableExtensions

title Install .NET Framework 3.5 - Windows Server 2022

:: Check for administrator privileges
net session >nul 2>&1
if not "%errorlevel%"=="0" (
    echo ERROR: Please run this script as Administrator.
    pause
    exit /b 1
)

:: Drive letter of the mounted Windows Server ISO
set "ISO=D:"

:: Check whether the installation source exists
if not exist "%ISO%\sources\sxs\" (
    echo ERROR: Source folder "%ISO%\sources\sxs" not found.
    echo Please update the ISO variable in this script.
    pause
    exit /b 2
)

echo.
echo Installing .NET Framework 3.5...
echo Source: %ISO%\sources\sxs
echo.

DISM /Online /Enable-Feature /FeatureName:NetFx3 /All /Source:"%ISO%\sources\sxs" /LimitAccess

if errorlevel 1 (
    echo.
    echo ERROR: Installation failed. DISM exit code: %errorlevel%
    pause
    exit /b 3
)

echo.
echo Installation completed successfully.
echo.
echo Verifying feature status...

DISM /Online /Get-FeatureInfo /FeatureName:NetFx3

pause
exit /b 0

 

Why don't you leave the answering of specific questions to the starter and dev of the thread, the question was a request to add something, not getting a script who knows from where that is nicked..

 

I am the author of the script

 

and you are telling us this now instead of back then? what took you so long?

 

I don't think that's necessary, especially since the script is easy to understand.

 

You need to login to view this posts content.