Even if it shows notification mode, the activation will succeed. I have been in the same position and it works.
Hello, I'm a little confused about the following: Code: MICROSOFT.OFFICE.2010.PROFESSIONAL.RTM.VOLUME.COMBO.ENGLISH.DVD-WZT BUILD: 14.0.4763.1000 FILE: 14.0.4763.1000_ProfessionalPlus_volume_ship_combo_en-us_dvd.iso SIZE: 1,617,412,096 byte SHA1: 598B23F4B89DD53EAFF899956F13ED55DA945CAC MD5: 77B9194FF6B5F3D84BA4D1A14B312D83 CRC: 974A8144 So is this an official MS release or not? And why do you consider it deprecated? I cannot find a matching hash on MSDN, so I'm not sure. Any info would be appreciated.
It's the leaked RTM meaning it is the code given to manufacturers to create actual product to buy. Yes the checksum is correct. I use it and have shared it with thousands of people with zero complaints. Activating however is a pain sometimes with KMS as everyone knows...lol...but the office works fine
The image is official but there is no way to confirm the hashes except trust. Since you can download either 32-bit or 64-bit ISO separately, the combo dvd download would be a waste of your bandwidth unless you plan to install different architectures on different systems.
All right, thanks for replying. This applies to ALL leaked VL images of the Pro edition (x86 or x64), right?
Yes, but who do you really trust? And what is the original? If I uploaded one of the files, and told you that the file is safe, do you trust me? So you have to really trust somebody if you download files that you can't confirm hash and crc32 info on. And people is always telling you that the file they offer is the real deal, but is it?? How can you know?
I'm a trusted up-loader...lol So thousands of people are happy with that build and no complaints yet. And MD gave that link for that copy and I trust him so lot's of trust going around myhken
I'm not saying you don't can trust MD, but I'm glad that I'm having my own Technet downloaded VL editions. I have used the Norwegian VL edition to create a English VL edition also. But if I share thees files, nobody can be sure that this is the real thing, since you can not compare the hash and crc32 info anywhere. But I know the files is 100% safe, and I'm happy. The rest, has the base their installations on trust
I run under the premise that the closer to untouched original, the better. Anything “pre-activated” goes in the bin. I know the following are the proper image names / part numbers distributed to volume customers. SW_DVD5_Office_Professional_Plus_2010_W32_English_MLF_X16-52536.ISO SW_DVD5_Office_Professional_Plus_2010_64Bit_English_MLF_X16-52545.ISO SW_DVD5_Office_2010_W32_English_MLF_X16-51904.ISO (Office Standard) Unfortunately I don’t have officially verified hashes (eg: there’s no list of hashes on a MS KB), so I just go by the trust of senior members that post hashes that say they have access to Microsoft VLSC, and getting the same hashes from several sources. Images from Wzor, although seemingly not “tainted” with malware, preactivatation or the like, and most likely built from clean sources, have no evidence of being a genuine untouched build/package of the products. They could have been early leaks before those builds were finalized! No evidence elsewhere that a dual 32/64 bit office exists, or that a “select” with everything on it exists. I still need to get around to posting the hashes for project and visio, but at least “select” lets you install those products as well, but I still want to be able to present what’s a known untouched source. Pro Plus combo isn’t one of the images that I know of as being available on VLSC, that’s why it’s depreciated, however I still list it so that if someone obtained the image they know that “most likely it’s clean”. Yet somehow the whole thing turns into urban legend. Yes the sources used in the Wzor builds are the “RTM” rev, but that doesn’t mean it’s some magical version released to OEMs. Look at the Aura that built around Office 2007 “Blue edition”. Some urban legand came around that it was a magical OEM version, which a) doesn’t make sense, and b) it was a hacked together VL version with a key preinstalled. Think about it, OEMs want OEM versions, which like Office Starter have an “OEM Preinstallation kit”, they don’t have a magical VL version. OEMs would only use a VL version of Office on their own company business computers, and they would use the same image as other volume customers.
I have a disc from microsoft labeled "Microsoft Office 2010 Backup Disc, NOT FOR RESALE" The disc is given to retailers to install the product pin card version of office home/student, home/business, and professional. SingleImage.WW contains all OEMs/Trials/Demo/Retail for those three versions. It is exactly the same as the retail discs in the store. It has a SingleImage.WW and both an x86/x64 folder with a "Platform Chooser" setup file (thats the name of the setup file on Microsoft's Flowchart). There is also a VLK that is distributed to companies with all products on it which is the same as the Select Volume one, minus the Office Standard 2010 VLK. EDIT: I also have a disc distributed to government workers which says on it "Microsoft Office 2010 Professional Plus, NOT FOR RESALE". It contains both x86 and x64 with the platform chooser setup file. The installs are IDENTICAL to the proplus retail downloads from MSDN/Technet. I also have a Microsoft Professional 2010 NOT FOR RESALE disc that is sent to all retail associates from Microsoft. The Home User Program was not renewed for the company I work for, but the installation is identical with the x86 and x64 platform chooser setup file.
No, it's no need for retail copies to use rearm. But if you test Office 2010 before you activate, you can use up rearms....
So it does work but no need for it. I am curious in trying to see how 2010 Retail/Volume might have hole to use rearms or reset of rearms to have full use of Office without need for keygen as an activation bypass this is why I ask Thank you
I don't but I fugured if rearm is a function of both retail and volume then a similair hole might exist for another way of using 2010 without keygen cause keygen works but is pain especially regarding AV's and sometimes very hard to activate with any exploit. Appreciate ZWT keygen just curious
Some questions about Office 2010. Due to some unfortunate circumstances, I've been away from my computer and this forum for quite some time and therefore am really behind on the latest info about Office 2010. I have an activated version installed (14.0.4763.1000) that will expire in a short time, but it has been so long since I installed it that I can't remember what steps I used to activate it! I do remember verifying the hash when I installed it so it is a good install. So, what I am asking is just what would you experts recommend that I do to keep Office running? I have downloaded 0.1.6.7z Activation & Conversion Kit, but don't know if it will work with the version I am running. There is just so much different info on the forum that I wind up with paralysis by analysis when I start reading it all. Is there a step by step procedure somewhere that will walk me through what I need to do? Also, does this Activation & Conversion Kit still have to be run every 180 days? Should I uninstall using Revo Uninstaller that will remove leftover registry files and start over, or is that overkill? Any info I can get will be much appreciated.
You have two options: 1. Use a KMS activator - use on with a scheduler, so you don't need to worry about activating again. 2. Find a MAK key and use that (if it gets blacklisted, find a new MAK key) If you use a good KMS activator, you don't need to uninstall it after each time. The OGA program is not active yet for Office 2010, so we don't know what they will detect and not.