most of the s**t on here is speculation unless Microsoft employees actually post on here its all bulls**t. Even from them 2 they are just subscribers who wait for updates to download from msdn thats why this thread needs to be closed and a windows 9 topic started.
I disagree with you slightly. The speculations here are drawn from various postulations by different people of different background which are used to form opinions. They are like forecasting which can go either way to provide idea of an outcome. Some of the speculations came out to be what Microsoft gave us in the August's Windows update. So, I opt we should keep the thread.
You don't need to because it is a prerequisite for the functionality of your system. Do not lose sight of the fact it is a patch as you aren't going to get Windows 9 till next year.
I am very confident Windows will keep the Windows part of coming release as a brand because it is a trademark as well as an obvious identification of the operating system. I guess, by my speculation, it would make sense to have it as Windows 9. WINDOWS 9!
For some it might be what you said but for me it cramps things up while replying different people with different notions. I think, for clarity sake, it is good not to multi-quote different people in a single reply. I may be wrong! Can somebody explain the relevance of multi-quoting different people than being a good etiquette as claimed?
I understand but Windows builds change more then people change their underwear on here so even if someone posts something its not accurate. Until you either see it on windows blogs or MSDN everything I've seen on here except the bldwin conference screenie has been gimmeky and has been disproved
Well, accuracy shouldn't be used to define the way this thread is being viewed. I for one has generally enjoyed the speculations and people opinions in this particular thread more than any other. I don't really know about other people's opinions though. Giving the time and pages, we can agree it has been something worth discussing about. We shouldn't forget this Windows doesn't preclude Windows 9 in anticipation. There is need to keep the thread as it ushers in more information that would be leading to Windows 9 yet still related to Windows 8.1 and its updates.
Multi-quoting different people doesn't make things complicated imo, especially when you separate different people with a line break like this:Multi-quoting is not only good etiquette, it's mandatory on most forums since double-posting is against forum rules. (I don't know about MDL, but I guess they have a similar rule in place) EDIT: I checked and there's no such rule on MDL, only this: But I don't think what you're doing falls under that rule, so no problem.
I never said it complicates reply but cramps replies of different people with different notions. Looking at my post you would agree with me I arguably support 'multi-quoting' the same person posts. However, being the the 'etiquette' of this forum, I would from now on multi-quote posts. My apologies for not adhering to one of the traditions of this forum.
LOL, what's the big deal? Gozzip-medias are one of the most prospering business in many places, we are just sort of paparazzi in computer stuffs.
You r always a standard here, never move again. Well my PS fonts are ok and i am not shopping in russia right now. Well it is upped and wtheno and lara hunny r doing fine (nxt skyrim pz), PC is fine have not tried to push with this new build. I see you in my mirror .... Well maybe relax and read a bit? Ya ya whatever this guy said ;-), you should take this as I appreciate it. Regards
I did, right after he posted the pic, but guess he might not be bold enough to post more. btw, did you get into that beta program?