you asked him on PCBeta, what do you think about the news about Sep30 announcement of Threshold ? vb4112 replied: very unlikely according to the progress I see so far. I haven't seen any date on the schedule. from them on, you were flaming everybody that claims Threshold will be annouced at Sep30 in official event. all in this post. should I copy some ?
But, it is not far-fetched there is a plan for Windows 9 press release event on September 30th, according to trusted tech and news websites .
if you didn't think thats a screenshot of 9, why would you ask him "why it says Windows 8.1 Preview instead of Technical Preview" ? and why would you look at that pic so carefully trying to find something not appeared in 8.1 ? and nope, I certainly won't roll on the floor for any real "noob question" from innocent people, but if an aggorant punk who thinks he knows everything and much better than anyone else made a noob mistake and proved he knows nothing and his 'trusted source' was actually making fun of him, I may actually rool on the floor.
@NaiveUser, if I had suspected VB posted a win9DP but shows win8.1, is it normal that I asked him to clarify? - I won't comment on biased remarks out of personal hatred.
No, I didn't, don't try to flood my inbox. AFAIK, the first was the European guy, he got the 97xx partner-out(i.e. the build reported by AngelWZR that showed on @Stealth's Store log).
that's for sure so sorry i didn't mean to by the way it's clear that this fateful iso is nowhere to be found just like david bowie's new album
With, fast approaching, 3500 posts, I sincerely doubt that anyone is reading back more than a couple of pages, if that! The thread could cheerfully be closed, as it has no real value except, apparently, as a battlefield between individual members - totally unrelated to to thread title. Perhaps, leak or otherwise, when Windows whatever arrives, a member could start a new and more informative thread?
Funny. This thread has lacked direction from the start and that did not stop anyone before. (Before I joined I went through all of it. Glad to know I'll never get that time back). In fact, I have for one have tried multiple times to actually discuss serious this topic and no one honestly seems to care. As another mentioned before, this thread is "only comedy" and in that light pretty disappointing. But at least the misinformation has finally stopped. But of course that could only happen once the trustworthy rumors finally received screenshot confirmation. Can we actually discuss as this thread is named? If anyone should be banned it should be the people who are talking bull about things 0% relevant to the topic at hand. (IMHO Comedy at least needs to have some relation to the discussion.) Yes please! Make sure to set some rules that we discuss rumors from trustworthy sources. Thank you! Another thread can be for the highly speculative/ untrustworthy/ people with access to corpnet. This would be one good way to prevent any future conflicts.
How could rules be made to discuss rumors from trustworthy sources? How on earth does one go about that? Take the word of the person who says they have a trustworthy source?? Isn't that the reason for a lot of the BS between some people here? e.g. my "source" said this, "your source is bs" blah blah... OR maybe force the source to prove they are trustworthy? I think speculation and rumor threads should be eliminated completely if it has come to a need for making rules on rumor and sources. Perhaps, just perhaps.. maybe people take rumors and upcoming releases a little too much to heart. I have never seen any gain to speculating about what will come -what someone hopes will come-. Waiting is the option we all have, nothing more. e-penis enlargement +1
Maybe that is what should be done then, keep the journalists on their sites, link to the stories and keep comments focused on the -linked to story- post in the thread. If someone would like to reach the trustworthy status of said journalists above, they might consider starting their own blog and building their accuracy up to the levels of the journalists you mention. I pretty much read the likes of "The National Enquirer", I find most of the alien abduction articles to be quite interesting. Not that I haven't read articles from TW, PT, BS, ZB and MJF of course.
I'm not sure if we came to a consensus or not, but fair enough. Those journalists do have areas for discussion on their respective sites. I am trying to find somewhere where real discussion with minimal trolls actually occurs and frankly it's not easy. It's either super hyperactive with little real substance or too little activity and little follow through. I just thought it might be more orderly to have two threads. That's just my two cents. I'm glad to hear about your interest in alien abductions, the supernatural is my personal favorite for sure.