How could rules be made to discuss rumors from trustworthy sources? How on earth does one go about that? Take the word of the person who says they have a trustworthy source?? Isn't that the reason for a lot of the BS between some people here? e.g. my "source" said this, "your source is bs" blah blah... OR maybe force the source to prove they are trustworthy? I think speculation and rumor threads should be eliminated completely if it has come to a need for making rules on rumor and sources. Perhaps, just perhaps.. maybe people take rumors and upcoming releases a little too much to heart. I have never seen any gain to speculating about what will come -what someone hopes will come-. Waiting is the option we all have, nothing more. e-penis enlargement +1
Maybe that is what should be done then, keep the journalists on their sites, link to the stories and keep comments focused on the -linked to story- post in the thread. If someone would like to reach the trustworthy status of said journalists above, they might consider starting their own blog and building their accuracy up to the levels of the journalists you mention. I pretty much read the likes of "The National Enquirer", I find most of the alien abduction articles to be quite interesting. Not that I haven't read articles from TW, PT, BS, ZB and MJF of course.
I'm not sure if we came to a consensus or not, but fair enough. Those journalists do have areas for discussion on their respective sites. I am trying to find somewhere where real discussion with minimal trolls actually occurs and frankly it's not easy. It's either super hyperactive with little real substance or too little activity and little follow through. I just thought it might be more orderly to have two threads. That's just my two cents. I'm glad to hear about your interest in alien abductions, the supernatural is my personal favorite for sure.
Fight has a negative connotation. (""take part in a violent struggle involving the exchange of physical blows or the use of weapons" Thank you Bing FTW) I prefer the phrase peaceful discussion especially since violence was not involved. Yes Murphy. I'm sorry I failed. The mob mentality runs strong within me. I've never been good with jokes so moving on... I'm betting there won't be a leak until WinFuture squeezes all the views possible from the videos spread out once a day. By the time they finish doing that it will be September 30 and Microsoft won't care anymore.
Nah, I simply had nothing that I could post lately, and I don't care much about banning thing, Jesthon had been banned countless times, but unfortunately he's got a faithful Paul to expose him every time he registers. Don't worry about that, when an ISO comes out(whether a leak or MS release), MDL would have a new win9 forum. I could just hope that they won't name it as "Windows Threshold" like the stupid WinClub.pl. Add: MS could change anything they have released, live example: Aug. Update.
a little bit clarification here: I actually thinks vb4112 is a valuable source, its rare that an (anonymous) MS employee would talk publicly about not-released infomation. although we should keep in mind that he is not in the core team and may not be able to get some information/bits, so if he says yes, that most likely is true, but if he says no, thats not neccessarily accurate, it just means he doesn't know. actually vb4112's own statements are generally reasonable and conservative, if translated accurately. but some guy took every word out of vb4112's mouth as the oracle from God and the only truth, then use it to dispute other (more) valuable sources, then the situation become ridiculous.
Tks @NaiveUser, at least we reach something in common, and seems you are now accepting his FB list is "most likely is true". No comment on your last statement, it's your personal thought and is none of my business.
Looks that way. Wait until the world finds out these two combatants are a real life same-sex couple living in Norway and these posts are their version of a "lovers spat".
Wonder if a Windows 8.1 MCE key will work on this. Thinking upgrading within windows then nicking the tokens and stuff as with Windows 8 and make a Windows 9 ISO. Just like we did with Windows 8 - 8.1 We installed Windows 8 activated grabbed the tokens after WMC was installed, Then we made the Windows 8.1 with MCE ISO and inserted our tokens/key/certs into it from the activated Windows 8 MCE install.
It won't work like that...the MCE keys were upgrade keys only & they were for Windows 8/8.1....If they allowed Win 8 keys to activate Windows 9 then where's the profit for them? it worked on 8.1 coz it was just an update to 8 but, this is the next version of Windows & they would never allow that.
I am to understand the activation system will be changing too. I am curious how far and what they change, if in fact they do change the activation system.