ETA Unknown, but we are getting pretty close to a V2.1 BETA once we work a few more things out. Unfortunately it won't run KMSEmulator from RAM for now.
This activation of Office 2010 64-bit on Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit yet allowed to install all the updates from Microsoft Update without problems? THANKS BYE
AVAST detecting AutoKMS.exe and KMSEmulator.exe Hi, I know you have all been talking about Avast now detecting AutoKMS and KMSEmulator. I have added them to the Exclusions list and that doesn't seem to matter. I always shutdown my computer at night. What is the best way to work around this issue? Thanks.
Hi I used the EZ Activator button to activate Office after installing the MSDN version of Office 2010 Standard x64. Amazing! Could even install updates Now I am curious, is it possible to run EZ Activator silently with a switch? That way I could easily create a 7zip sfx installer for my family to install (and activate) office 2010 with only one click
Office 2007 currently installed on Win7 x64 upgrading to 2010 I have Office 2007 currently installed on Win7 x64. If i wanted to upgrade to to Office 2010 and test your ToolKit.... What is the best/cleanest method to Upgrade? (uninstall/install, or just Upgrade....) What is the best verison of Office 2010 to install? (ie will this cut it?: Microsoft.Office.2010.ProfessionalPlus.VL.Edition.x86.and.x64-ZWTiSO or is it better to test with another build? ) Also i see a new release 2.1 comming out very soon, should I wait? Thanks for your time and input!!!
Ok, the best way is to completely uninstall Office 2007, and then install 2010. About Office version, ProPlus has everything, but for example: I just install Word, Excel, PowerPoint and Outlook because that's all I need. After you install Office 2010 you just run the Toolkit and use the EZ-Activator button. Remember that your Antiviruts may detect AutoKMS.exe or KMSEmulator.exe as false positivies virus, but don't worry, those files are fine.
To everyone: I was wondering on the need of a silent switch and I think I see 2 main purposes for wanting a silent switch: 1. You want to sell Office and you charge a fee for the "Activated but not original" Office. 2. You actually sell Office as original. I'm considering if the silent switch is really needed, or if it's just to contribute scammers, so I was thinking in an "execution switch" instead of a silent switch, it would be the same but it will let the user know that it's not a legitime software. Any thoughts about this are welcome
This is an interesting point. I agree with you -a "silent switch" only serves to fool other people, not the person who implements the switch. Full automation is a worthy goal, but having the user oblivious as to what's happening will just provide opportunities for scams.
Well a popup could be added like Daz loader but that could be annoying and patched out by someone determined enough. Basically right now it does silent and while we could show the toolkit, it would be likely the window could be hidden somehow.
People wanted to intergrate IORRT but I didn't help them cause I also don't want office sold just shared
I would say use the execution switch but then again, people would do a lot for money (hack the message away)
Imo don't even consider adding such switch. It is not really needed, so don't bother. Don't waste your energy on that. It's like Bosh was saying.