Discussion in 'Application Software' started by LostED, Apr 15, 2019.
Looks like SVF repository has been updated with smv 3.82. Thanks
You need to login to view this posts content.
I don't believe that smv64 will work in case when smv32 fails.
And since -192 extracts normally even on 32bitOS, I will use it instead of -522.
I hope you don't mind but I have a question about your SVF Extractor, any particular reason that on a x64 OS it uses smv.exe 32bits?
SVF eXtractor 2.1.15: error!
SVF eXtractor 2.1.13: fine!
I am having exactly the same problem. Oddly enough, version 2.1.15 does work on another PC running within a virtual machine.
There's some compatability issue between 2.1.15 and my PC but cannot work it out. Please could the developer take a look?
SMV x64 is not mandatory for x64 OS. But for compatibility on x86 OS, SMV x86 is a better choice.
Yes, v2.1.15 seems a little buggy but if you drop svf file on svfx it will work - both on x86 and x64.
Granted that svf file is not compressed with latest ZSTD. This is not compatible with x86 OS.
v2.1.14 use same binaries and a little less "buggy" than v2.1.15
Not sure about differences between 2.1.14 and 2.1.15 - was not aware of the latest update.
Yes I know that the use of x64 isn't mandatory but isn't it faster?
Never really timed it to see if there is a difference regarding decoding.
But a generous amount of RAM in total will benefit anyway, 8 GB or more.
And a SSD.
Anyway, it would not be a point if compatibility is of concern.
That said, latest SMV can produce smaller svf files but then again you would need a x64 OS.
Here is the files from tmp folder (all i got)
Normally, only smv.exe is presented but i get a few more files files with v2.1.15
(smv.exe is not included in compressed file)
No log file presented - in tmp folder or side-by-side svfx.exe (v2.1.15)
I tested uploaded file with same result.
svfx.exe was executed from a usb disk and from system disk
With and without a svf file present(side-by-side)
OS: Win 7 x64(not virtual)
Behaviour seems to be similar to what Bau posted(last year?)
No issues at all with v2.1.14
(on error) log will be created at the same folder as svfx.exe
Executed from desktop. No svf files present(side-by-side) - no log file recorded.
This is the softpedia svfx.exe
Path partially enlisted is from a different partition.
Why svfx list this -
Yup, no log file is being generated when using v2.1.15 (both Softpedia and cloud.mail.ru copies). Also when choosing a SVF folder, it says "No SVFs found" despite there are SVF files in the folder itself.
Is there a chance for an arm(64) linux binary of smv in the following years?