SmartVersion | Tools + Scripts

Discussion in 'Application Software' started by LostED, Apr 15, 2019.

  1. Graznok

    Graznok MDL Member

    Jan 29, 2013
    210
    118
    10
    Looks like SVF repository has been updated with smv 3.82. Thanks
     
  2. GezoeSloog

    GezoeSloog knows a guy, who knows another guy.

    Feb 10, 2012
    825
    6,545
    30
  3. GezoeSloog

    GezoeSloog knows a guy, who knows another guy.

    Feb 10, 2012
    825
    6,545
    30
    @Sajjo
    I don't believe that smv64 will work in case when smv32 fails.
    And since -192 extracts normally even on 32bitOS, I will use it instead of -522.
     
  4. MrZeb

    MrZeb MDL Novice

    Jul 29, 2009
    14
    4
    0
    Hi @GezoeSloog

    I hope you don't mind but I have a question about your SVF Extractor, any particular reason that on a x64 OS it uses smv.exe 32bits?

    Thanks.
     
  5. Outcast

    Outcast MDL Member

    Mar 23, 2009
    176
    129
    10
    @GezoeSloog,
    SVF eXtractor 2.1.15: error!
    upload_2021-6-25_23-55-7.png

    SVF eXtractor 2.1.13: fine!
    upload_2021-6-25_23-56-48.png
     
  6. boydf

    boydf MDL Novice

    Aug 9, 2015
    1
    0
    0
    I am having exactly the same problem. Oddly enough, version 2.1.15 does work on another PC running within a virtual machine.

    There's some compatability issue between 2.1.15 and my PC but cannot work it out. Please could the developer take a look?

    Thank you.
     
  7. Sajjo

    Sajjo MDL Member

    Feb 6, 2018
    1,750
    2,399
    60
    @MrZeb
    SMV x64 is not mandatory for x64 OS. But for compatibility on x86 OS, SMV x86 is a better choice.

    @Outcast @boydf
    Yes, v2.1.15 seems a little buggy but if you drop svf file on svfx it will work - both on x86 and x64.
    Granted that svf file is not compressed with latest ZSTD. This is not compatible with x86 OS.
    v2.1.14 use same binaries and a little less "buggy" than v2.1.15

    Not sure about differences between 2.1.14 and 2.1.15 - was not aware of the latest update.
    :)
     
  8. MrZeb

    MrZeb MDL Novice

    Jul 29, 2009
    14
    4
    0
    Yes I know that the use of x64 isn't mandatory but isn't it faster?
     
  9. Sajjo

    Sajjo MDL Member

    Feb 6, 2018
    1,750
    2,399
    60
    Never really timed it to see if there is a difference regarding decoding.
    But a generous amount of RAM in total will benefit anyway, 8 GB or more.
    And a SSD.

    Anyway, it would not be a point if compatibility is of concern.

    That said, latest SMV can produce smaller svf files but then again you would need a x64 OS.

    :)
     
  10. GezoeSloog

    GezoeSloog knows a guy, who knows another guy.

    Feb 10, 2012
    825
    6,545
    30
  11. Sajjo

    Sajjo MDL Member

    Feb 6, 2018
    1,750
    2,399
    60
    Hi :) @GezoeSloog
    Here is the files from tmp folder (all i got)
    Normally, only smv.exe is presented but i get a few more files files with v2.1.15
    (smv.exe is not included in compressed file)

    No log file presented - in tmp folder or side-by-side svfx.exe (v2.1.15)
    I tested uploaded file with same result.
    svfx.exe was executed from a usb disk and from system disk
    With and without a svf file present(side-by-side)

    OS: Win 7 x64(not virtual)

    Behaviour seems to be similar to what Bau posted(last year?)
    fyi:
    No issues at all with v2.1.14
     

    Attached Files:

  12. GezoeSloog

    GezoeSloog knows a guy, who knows another guy.

    Feb 10, 2012
    825
    6,545
    30
    (on error) log will be created at the same folder as svfx.exe :wha:
     
  13. Sajjo

    Sajjo MDL Member

    Feb 6, 2018
    1,750
    2,399
    60
    #394 Sajjo, Jun 28, 2021
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2021
    28-06-2021 21.30.56.ls.jpg

    Executed from desktop. No svf files present(side-by-side) - no log file recorded.
    This is the softpedia svfx.exe

    BTW
    Path partially enlisted is from a different partition.
    Why svfx list this - :dunno:
     
  14. GezoeSloog

    GezoeSloog knows a guy, who knows another guy.

    Feb 10, 2012
    825
    6,545
    30
  15. Outcast

    Outcast MDL Member

    Mar 23, 2009
    176
    129
    10
    #396 Outcast, Jul 1, 2021
    Last edited: Jul 1, 2021
    Yup, no log file is being generated when using v2.1.15 (both Softpedia and cloud.mail.ru copies). Also when choosing a SVF folder, it says "No SVFs found" despite there are SVF files in the folder itself.

    upload_2021-7-1_21-49-21.png
     
  16. jim_p

    jim_p MDL Senior Member

    Dec 11, 2013
    288
    106
    10
    Is there a chance for an arm(64) linux binary of smv in the following years?