I think Windows 11 ISOs are much bigger than Windows Vista's. Ok, but after all it's right to be worried about the current download speed. What about the limit of the user which provided the torrent and the number of seeds? At downloading files, what do you think? I'm talking about it for a long time. How? That's precisely what I'm asking, don't you think? Why? To not take so much time? Much faster. Yes, it does, since I don't want to waste hours downloading files that can be downloaded in a few minutes. For me it does, especially when my download speed shouldn't be as slow since my hired ISP program isn't that bad and is it so wrong wanting to know how to get higher download speeds even if I already had a high one, anyway?
Your talking about different situations ........... but the only difference is the program being used to download the files .............. thats the only variable ? The speed it comes over depends on how many seeds there are and how much bandwith they offer ........... but thats the same with every torrent program . @ Me ....... i have 250 mbs down and 50 mbs up for 30 quid / euros a month .......... i regularly download a file thats 38.35. G ............. with vuze .......... I'm going to do it now ..........just to see how long it takes
Vista x64 is 3.6 GB, W11 is around 5GB not even 2x the size, after 15 years. Like I said in that timeframe the network speed had an increase from 10x to 500x or even more. For comparison Win 95 was 35MB, Five years later Win 2000 was almost 400MB, more than 10x, in that timeframe the network speed remained almost constant for large part of the users. There is nothing wrong in trying to improve something, is being too focused on that that isn't a good thing Perhaps you haven't yet mentioned how you're connected, what's your contract and what is the theoretical speed it promises. Nor what's the practical download speed you normally get both from normal http downloads and from torrents.
So, the used BitTorrent client doesn't really matter? I think 3.6 GB to 5 GB is a big difference and the Windows 11 ISOs I've been downloading are over 6 GB. I don't think it's a matter of being focused when the torrent download speed is very lower than the hired one. My plan is 500 Mbps and often BitTorrent clients download at less than 1 MB/s. I don't think the download speed I get from HTTP/HTTPS downloads have to do with this subject but they offer much faster ones than the BitTorrent client ones. Anyway, it seems qBittorrent offers 4 Windows versions: x64, x64 (lt qt5), x64 (qt6) and x64 (lt20 qt6). Which one should I download? Also, some sites state μTorrent is faster than qBittorrent.
Ok I give up. Please come back when you learn the difference between absolute numbers and relative ones. So if you thing you already know, why you're wasting your (and ours) time asking? It's obviously a very relevant info, or I didn't ask
Why don't you enlighten me, then? For me it's not a relative difference but a big one. If you give up then why bother type more words? It wasn't me which brought the HTTP download speed to the subject but you and you're not forced to answer my questions. It isn't for me and I also think I made obvious questions and you think otherwise.
Done . Got it 38.35 G in 35 minutes . Faster than that ? It would have taken nearly as long just to copy it from one HHD to another . >So, the used BitTorrent client doesn't really matter? I havent done any tests recently ......... but i dont see any reason why one program should do the same thing as another faster ? ......... or if theres a difference its only trivial .
I already tried 3/4 times. If a car costed 5000$ in 95 and you earned 500$ per month you were a relatively poor man If after 15 years a similar car cost 8500$ but your salary is now between 5000$ and half million. You are rich, no matter if the price of the car is much higher than it was. Those are relative numbers Indeed, I dont care if you understand why I asked, just reply to that simple question if you like to have a decent answer.
I thought you had given up so do you care after all. I already replied and stated the HTTP/HTTPS download speed are way higher than torrent ones. Anyway, I'm still waiting for you to give a decent answer why I get under 1 Mbps torrent download speed with a hired 500 Mbps speed. That question was made before you started talking about relative and absolute numbers so who has to answer who?
Oh finally.... Pretty simple your ISP is filtering torrents (very likely) or you have something messed up in your router (possible)
They have hundreds of seeds. How can I know if I'm being blocked and is that even legal? Finally? I told you the same thing before. Didn't you state you had given up? If so, why do you keep answering me? I had the same problem in the previous router.
>How can I know if I'm being blocked and is that even legal? I dont know where you are or what the law there is ......... or what contract you have ............ but its happened to me in the past ..... and its a pain in the arse . To know ? Write the ISP an email and ask them ?
It's Monday, It's summer, I had some spare time, I decided to waste part of it taking with a pampered kid...
I don't think that's so simple. Isn't it illegal to be blocked in the first place? You mean, you don't even know what you state, not to mention you're blind as well? That's your decent answer?
It seems qBittorrent has 4 Windows versions: x64, x64 (lt qt5), x64 (qt6) and x64 (lt20 qt6). Which one should I download? Also, some sites state μTorrent is faster than qBittorrent.
Test yourself which is faster for you. Download same torrent from both apps one at a time for 10 minutes. Guessing your OS is 64 bit , go for default x64 bit version of qbittorrent ( first one ). QT is a framework used to build UI. Some people like QT version of Qbittorrent. All versions are same. I found that default x64 version is nice. In rare cases Qbittorrent fail to download some torrents. In that case I use Bittorrent free version to download that torrent. You can also try Bitcomet as I said before. Ok torrent speed depends on number of things that you people discussing day and night. Speed of original seeder or his limits set, speed of other seeders and peers and their limits set, all of their ISPs upload speed limits or throttling, distance between you and all seeds/peers you connected, your internet speed and your ISP throttling etc. Speed also depends how an app program their network connections. So it is useless to fight about it. Start and test yourself with 2 or 3 apps with same torrent download one at a time. Repeat test on some more torrents like that and find yourself what is best. Torrent files have good chances of connecting faster and getting more seeds than magnet links. But it is not true in all cases. If torrent have more seeds then both torrent / magnet download at same speeds. But torrent files help in finding more seeds when seeds are less in some cases. So prefer torrent files first and if not available, then magnets.
will you please stop questioning forever ? there was some errors like "v1 and v2 hash mismatch" or something like that from my local country torrents on qbittorrent. now days i am not seeing that error anymore or i am not downloading my local torrents. It didn't happen with other country torrents. Bittorrent is standard and oldest of all but it contain ads. So you can use Bittorrent pro cracked if you want or purchase it. On other side Bitcomet is free with ads but you can hide ads and it is also a good one I tested. Stop questioning and start testing. A wise person would keep 2 torrent apps installed so if one fails or slow down , other will help. For me Qbittorrent is first preference and Bittorrent Pro cracked second. Right now I am only with Qbittorrent.