No, but I ordered win98se retail upgrade on ebay. (Item is still shipping.) I have junk cd of win98se retail full with bootdisk.
(06/03/2014) Windows 98 Second Edition (Original Release / USA / 04-23-1999) 1) Retail Upgrade version SHA1:ad577edc3ce9f1a702b96ea523fcbd45a12ddfc8 / (ISO CD Image, Size : 652,603,392 bytes)
ibmpc5150, you posted the following hash for Windows 98 Second Edition OEM Full version: This is different from the one posted by Threat: Code: OEM CD (Full) ------------- File: PRECOPY2.CAB CRC-32: 04086a8b MD4: a7bc0ec78ff0d46dbd6456067dfb5d58 MD5: f9adbde0c51f118e1ac7803ca266bb45 SHA-1: 7975cecdf00b9de1fdcc2889c920cdcf9281491b Size: 1,335,443 bytes Product Type: 115 - Clean install using Full OEM CD ISO SHA-1: fa040cd3f7fd472e9612b1721bc72d7b82538450 The ISO I had was the same one posted by Threat: SHA1: fa040cd3f7fd472e9612b1721bc72d7b82538450 Size: 655,591,424 bytes (320113 sectors) Then I decided to use WinHex to pad the difference in file size, with zeroes. I added 612352 bytes of zeroes (299 sectors), to the end of the ISO file, and got the exact same file you posted: SHA1: 3fc56ca830a8094d66f2223f176115fcdea4f37a Size: 656,203,776 bytes (320412 sectors) So, which one is the proper dump? Also, I've been trying to recreate the Windows 98 Second Edition Startup Boot Disk you posted: Code: Windows 98 Second Edition (Original Release / USA / 04-23-1999) 1) Retail Full version SHA1:f56e6fbc58c24f140b9e3a09930a0643a2bef4dc / (ISO CD Image, Size : 652,738,560 bytes) SHA1:322cc0ed5091c5d37f3081f0e6609ad778232631 / (IMA Floppy Image, Size : 1,474,560 bytes) -- Startup Boot Disk I used 7-Zip to extract the bootable floppy image, from the OEM CD mentioned above, but they don't match: File: Bootable_1.44M.img SHA1: e7d8012d43f097dd821d64572c2ffc24e5c4faf0 Size: 1,474,560 bytes Can you please tell me the difference between the Retail and OEM floppy disk images? Or perhaps provide an xdelta? Thanks.
Mine is proper. The SHA1 of 3fc56ca830a8094d66f2223f176115fcdea4f37a is with 'padding'. Official Microsoft images made with CDIMAGE and (if) posted on MSDN don't have this padding. It gets added as a result of writing to a CD then reading back using software that is not intelligent enough to remove.
Does anyone have an xdelta patch to this version? I have original Retail Full media only, would like to have Retail Upgrade as well. I noticed there was an earlier post with an xdelta patch but the produced ISO didn't have valid hash.
Does anyone have hashes for Finnish Windows 95 (any versions)? I have these images. Windows 95 OEM Finnish File Date: 24.08.1995 12:50 Volume: FINWIN95 Volume Set ID: FINWIN95 Publisher: MICROSOFT CORPORATION Data Preparer: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, ONE MICROSOFT WAY, REDMOND WA 98052, (206) 882-8080 Application: CDIMAGE V1.15 (04/26/94 TM) SHA1 (Overdumped): 6CE569F2922401634C5126B6436932AFCE233F19 SHA1: 21CEB96E6FA9A4A81E2B9091FB39ACD34D819C57 Windows 95 OSR2.1 Finnish File Date: 01.05.1997 15:14 Volume: FINW95B_USB Volume Set ID: FINW95B_USB Publisher: MICROSOFT CORPORATION Data Preparer: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, ONE MICROSOFT WAY, REDMOND WA 98052, (206) 882-8080 Application: CDIMAGE 2.28 (08/01/96 TM) SHA1 (Overdumped): 14BF6B6987EC59D35592FAE79BB7C78018E52305 SHA1: 8857988984865F0F8FCFBDAB79575C52AC4026DE Volume label FINW95B_USB seems strange but I guess this is that version with USB support?
my Hashas are Code: ;win95 21CEB96E6FA9A4A81E2B9091FB39ACD34D819C57 *[FIN] win95_OEM-FullSetup_cd_type09_00000000.iso ;win95b 8857988984865F0F8FCFBDAB79575C52AC4026DE *[FIN] win95b_osr2.1_OEM-FullSetup_cd_type09_19970501.iso can you please upload and send me a PM with your versions please - i can check your isos first
thx same as mine !! sorry my mistake, i did not loock at your "SHA1 (ISO Volume Filter):" SHA1 please do not post overdumped hashes - only real iso hashes (non zero padded files) are valid / usable to compare
NP. I posted those overdumped hashes because those were the hashes of the ISO files I downloaded. Correct hashes are my rerip with UltraISO. I thought someone else might download from the same source too, so if Google brings them here they know it's ok, it's just overdumped.
I clarified the hashes on my earlier post. I'll add all verified "abandonware" Finnish images on OneDrive and added it into my sig.