Some of the hotfixes contain MSPs that overlap (have the same name) with ones from other hotfixes. WHD adds "[1]" to ones with duplicate filenames and it's up to you to choose which to use. There are just a few (four, currently) but it's important that you choose just one of them if you're using the Updates folder for them during initial install of Office or are using WHD to integrate them. If you don't choose and put both files (for example, access-x-none.msp and access-x-none[1].msp) in your Updates folder, you'll get that error 2902 (ixfAssemblyCopy) message. Normally, you'd choose the MSP with the latest date as the one to install, but there are a few where the latest version of the MSP is contained in files where the dates are older by about 10 days. So, for those four that have duplicate names (currently: access-x-none, excel-x-none, mso-x-none & msointl-en-us) right-click on the files, choose Properties, then Details to determine the version number. Do that for both the regularly named MSP and the MSP with "[1]" in the name to determine which has the highest version number then delete the other. If they both have the same version number, choose the one with "[1]" to delete. Eliminating the duplicate files from your install should avoid that error 2902. For those others that are appearing as needed in Windows Update, they'll need to be looked at by the maintainer of the Office lists (burfadel) when he returns in a week and a half.
View attachment 26272 View attachment 26273 View attachment 26274 View attachment 26275 View attachment 26276 This photos show that at the end the integrated updates and language pack dosen't in fact integrate .
Thank you Alphawaves for your info. A suggestion: what about to add the option to load directly the iso image instead for wmc conversion? (like in updates integrator)
Hi leom81, its slow for myself sometimes. Depending on my download speed (being capped) also links may be overloaded..
Thanks Alpha for continuing to support this wonderful program. I really appreciate it. Keep up the great work.
Hi Alphawaves , with 4.9 version is working now ! View attachment 26290 But, after I integrate the 44 updates for Windows 8.1 (x64) in retail version and in the VL version with rollup-1, in both cases, after the first update check, Windows update show this : View attachment 26291 This updates was integrated and if I type " Dism /Online /Get-Packages /Format:table" , this updates appear in the list. Can you check this ? Thanks !
Alpha, does the process of integrating updates throw any sort of error when it comes upon one of those updates that has to wait till another one is added before it can be added? I know that the process of integrating them continues even if one is attempted and cannot complete then later when you try to add them again, it provides a list of updates already added then you can add the ones that haven't been. Could those that are skipped be added to the back of the list mid stream?
Hi Humphrey, my tool only does as it says. I leave the choice of what to integrate to end user. I cannot be held responsible for how the end user uses it (I just hope they do know what they are doing).
I see, but not everybody can manage that, is too hard to keep a list with the order in wich the updates should be integrated. Can you make the integator to sort the updates by date wich they are made (as an example), so the updates can be integrated properly ?
As always I will continue to make this tool better. Little update: Fixed Application loading delay, first post updated..