Quite a few seem to hold the view that come hell or high water pisthai has to be right and has to have the last word - ALWAYS - even when he is 100% wrong. He'll also argue that black is white. It can be seen many times on the forum. At no stage in any of the many replies advising him that he's wrong, has anyone mentioned the legality or otherwise of svf patches. So in response to a wealth of posts advising him he's wrong we then get a tale about his incorrectly patched files not matching their listed checksums! @pisthai - Fact. If your svf patched files didn't match the original checksums then you did something wrong, or something went wrong in your process. This is fact. Mr X pointed out to you - you are wrong - you are. Please accept it. Awaits the usual type of pisthai reply...
I want to know the size of the Windows 1511 update ? not the iso file I m meaning the update which appear in Windows update.
Off Topic, just another answer to the post of Nucleus: The law of the country I'm living, is something I've to follow and I do! Normally I didn't attack anyone who' a stranger, and such a member of any forum I didn't know in person, is simply that: a Stranger! Exception from 2. is if I get attacked from someone, I reserve the right to answer in such manner! Never I claimed to be perfect, I'm not, I'm imperfect and anybody should know that who's looking at my member name! Never I claimed to know better than the user of his computer, what that user did wrong, if any, I'm simply not in a position for to do that and nobody else is able to claim such, except the real user! Informations given about something, are best to my knowledge and based on own experiences without to claim that MUST work for others too, what could but must! I simply ask, and asked that sometimes already in the past: keep your comments polite (to all members, not only to me), not accuse, insult or attack anybody, even not just verbal! Be objective and fair. Anyone is simply an imperfect human! For sure, if someone are able to claim to be perfect, please step forward and show................!
That's pisthai right on cue, resort to insults. @ pisthai - This is about your extremely incorrect posts about svf patches and as was pointed out to you, the fact that some may have actually believed you (if several ppl hadn't posted showing you were wrong). You are wrong and were proven wrong in your posts about svf patches. In this post you were invited to check and prove for yourself by creating (from the Multi ISO) a Single Language or Enterprise ISO from these svf's. So you then changed to something about the legality of SmartVersion which no one had mentioned. Again, if you or your procedure had been correct then your ISO's would have hash matched perfectly. And spare us the line about you "don't attack anyone who's a stranger". Clearly you're well known as argumentative and having to be correct and having to have the last word - many know it, hence the posts about it. Why else have so many formed that opinion? Please try the suggested svf patches and prove to yourself. Now carry on, you can have the last word as you ALWAYS have to.
Cand you upload romanian version, please? File Name: ro_windows_10_multiple_editions_version_1511_x64_dvd_7223781.iso Languages: Romanian SHA1: EA8D0DD8D2E76C90381149535FBE610709C3E823 File Name: ro_windows_10_multiple_editions_version_1511_x86_dvd_7223783.iso Languages: Romanian SHA1: E151AFB8DD763D3053B64BBE93CE5BF47C554D2A
