Where is other languages(ClientSingleLanguages)? Arabic, English-UK, French, Portuguese-Brazil,Russian, Spanish, Thai, Turkish. (Chinese-Simpl., English-US in Baidu Cloud.)
Windows 10 PRO Build 10049 (x64) All languages Spoiler Removed Windows 10 PRO Build 10049 (x86) All languages Spoiler Removed
Yeah I already got the CorePro x64 ISO.. But seems that 10054 will be out soon so skipping 10051 for now
All those share links are not wanted if i'm right, not one of them let's you download without subscribing and some of them don't work even if you try to subscribe.
anyone have seen the 10049.0.150325-1700.fbl_impressive_clientpro_ret_x64fre_de-de_3aaffe5f880ef6a51ddccf66b75b765aef7cd9c5.esd without chinese site??
Please anyone have link: 10049.0.150325-1700.fbl_impressive_clientpro_ret_x64fre_es-es_105c492c3f763b75e3bb8bf2c0e6082b4df09a6f.esd
I used "esd-decrypter-wimlib-4" to create an ISO of Build 10049. But now with Build 10061 the decrypter doesn´t work any more. How can I fix it?
Look, Rob, I know you're busy with installing the same build a few hundred times, just so you have an absurd amount of screenshots in every conceivable language, but its not an excuse for you to start posting around things that you evidently do not understand. There are two variants of 10061 ESD - one that leaked originally, that uses an unknown RSA key. It is currently not known what purpose these ESDs serve. The other is the public release of 10061, which are the same ESDs, but re-encrypted with a different RSA key. Literally the only differences between the two sets are the encrypted parts. It's not corrupt, that's just nonsense. It matches the sha1 has in the file name. Edit: and now his post is deleted, so mine makes no sense Still, paragraph 2 might be useful for others.
Technically, you are saying Microsoft created two variants of 10061 ESD, one is leaked to the public without RSA key and the other through WU. That doesn't make sense when it is leaked without key because it's more or less not a leak. The SHA-1 is not evidence to prove the leaked ESD is not corrupt because even when it's the SHA-1 would still be intact if the ESD is not 100% downloaded. While it is different from the one later released by Microsoft there is no argument that the previous one only has something wrong with RSA key demanded by the Decryption sofftware.
The RSA key has nothing to do with the ESD (which is not corrupt) the one published through Win7 WU uses unknown RSA key the one published through Win10 flight ring uses the known RSA key simple as that BTW, "leaked" and "public" are against each other technically