Windows 10 Hotfix Repository

Discussion in 'Windows 10' started by Tito, Oct 1, 2014.

  1. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,679
    103,520
    450
    #2501 Enthousiast, Jul 15, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 20, 2017
    No it's not, this is my current project:

    Integrating kb's into 10586.0 win image (offline, manually, one by one in the red marked order)

    With dotnetfx pre-enabled:

    Code:
    1.
    Package Identity : Microsoft-Windows-NetFx3-OnDemand-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~x86~~10.0.10586.0
    State : Install Pending
    Release Type : OnDemand Pack
    Install Time : 12/7/2015 10:21 PM
    Integrated kb's:

    Code:
    2.
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB3116278~31bf3856ad364e35~x86~~10.0.1.0
    State : Install Pending
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 7/15/2016 12:35 AM
    
    3.
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB3173428~31bf3856ad364e35~x86~~10.0.1.0
    State : Install Pending
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 7/15/2016 12:36 AM
    
    4.
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB3174060~31bf3856ad364e35~x86~~10.0.1.0
    State : Install Pending
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 7/15/2016 12:36 AM
    
    5.
    Package Identity : Package_for_RollupFix~31bf3856ad364e35~x86~~10586.499.1.0
    State : Install Pending
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 7/15/2016 12:49 AM
    No problem, manually.

    ps, they get state: "pending" because i've pre-enabled dotnetfx before integrating the other kb's.

    EDIT:

    Now this happens when I do exactly the same on an offline 10586.0 image without dotnetfx3 pre-enabled (so all updates should get state: "installed":

    Integrating the current CU after doing step 2 > 4:

    Code:
    An error occurred trying to open - e:\WIM.Kaal.x86_NL\4.CU Error: 0x80070003
    An error occurred trying to open - e:\WIM.Kaal.x86_NL\4.CU Error: 0x80070003
    
    Error: 3
    
    An error occurred trying to open - e:\WIM.Kaal.x86_NL\4.CU Error: 0x80070003
    
    The DISM log file can be found at C:\WINDOWS\Logs\DISM\dism.log
    Getpackages after:
    Code:
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB3116278~31bf3856ad364e35~x86~~10.0.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 7/15/2016 1:03 AM
    
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB3173428~31bf3856ad364e35~x86~~10.0.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 7/15/2016 1:05 AM
    
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB3174060~31bf3856ad364e35~x86~~10.0.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 7/15/2016 1:05 AM
     
  2. armond

    armond MDL Addicted

    Jun 16, 2008
    737
    240
    30
    #2502 armond, Jul 15, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 20, 2017
  3. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,679
    103,520
    450
    That must be the reason they released a new CU so fast after the previous one.

    On 14388 RS1 preview it never showed up.
     
  4. armond

    armond MDL Addicted

    Jun 16, 2008
    737
    240
    30
    Interesting.
    BTW updates for version 1607 started to appear Microsoft Update Catalog... I see KB3176476 and KB3176479 dated on July 14.
    What's going on...:)
     
  5. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,679
    103,520
    450
  6. Full inu

    Full inu MDL Addicted

    Jun 9, 2015
    516
    133
    30
    Gosh, really?
    RS1 update doesn't released yet, but they already make tons of KBs?
    Sorry, but i hate to integrate patches in winre.wim & boot.wim
    Also, catalog.update.microsoft.com doesn't work for me now. :rolleyes:
     
  7. 600415

    600415 MDL Member

    Aug 31, 2015
    223
    268
    10
    Compared, to .494, the new build only features new lddmcore (the graphics subsystem)
     
  8. drew84

    drew84 MDL Expert

    Mar 13, 2014
    1,398
    2,384
    60
    Same Here....
    Need Help with Links to these Updates for 10240 in order to update Review - KBs 3163912 CU, 3173427 SS, 3174060 FP, 3172983 DU
    ... TIA
     
  9. armond

    armond MDL Addicted

    Jun 16, 2008
    737
    240
    30
    It's working for me here. Tried to download kb3172988 and it's working.
    BTW how to grab download links on Windows 10? Sorry for the stupid question...:)
     
  10. abbodi1406

    abbodi1406 MDL KB0000001

    Feb 19, 2011
    17,209
    90,791
    340
  11. abbodi1406

    abbodi1406 MDL KB0000001

    Feb 19, 2011
    17,209
    90,791
    340
  12. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,679
    103,520
    450
  13. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,679
    103,520
    450
  14. abbodi1406

    abbodi1406 MDL KB0000001

    Feb 19, 2011
    17,209
    90,791
    340
    So? where is the question? :D

    Nevertheless, servicing stack goes first
    it's mainly affect running os
     
  15. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,679
    103,520
    450
    The question is: Why this:

    When offline pre-enabled dotnetfx3 the integration of all needed updates goes fine and also without the servicing stack integrated first.
     
  16. abbodi1406

    abbodi1406 MDL KB0000001

    Feb 19, 2011
    17,209
    90,791
    340
    servicing stack is actively used when you boot the image to install it
    integration don't matter much
     
  17. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,679
    103,520
    450
    I know but there is something about it.

    For me personally it's not a biggy (i always first offline enable dotnetfx3 so the CU gets "install pending" and will install after it and update it, if needed).
     
  18. tistou77

    tistou77 MDL Expert

    Mar 22, 2008
    1,947
    612
    60
    It is not useful to integrate this update to ISO? and install it afterwards ?