Windows 1607 have almost 75% share of all Windows 10 installations. Maybe, because of this? It was announced earlier by MS officials: 10240 and 10586 are 'deprecated' now. No new functions, no new drivers, only security fixes.
After integrating manually SStack update, CU, etc into boot.wim-index 2, is there need to resetbase or something to clean up files and reduce size? Note that boot.wim-index2 image is already mounted...
Before servicing: 258MB in size After integration + Resetbase: 391MB After exporting index 1 and 2: 377MB Are these numbers fine?
Spoiler Gonna try again like you did: sstack kb3199209 and IP CU (kb3197954) in index #1 and 2 What do you mean by rebuild? Any special dism command or something alike? Edit: I did integrate these: windows10.0-kb3176936-x64_795777f8a7f8cd1a4c96ee030848f9f888490555.msu windows10.0-kb3199986-x64_5d4678c30de2de2bd7475073b061d0b3b2e5c3be.msu windows10.0-kb3197954-x64_bebe4199bdcb04f6d51df3d8f9abc7de95a9dcc3.cab
Test 3 (same KB's as you did): Integrated sstack kb3176936, KB3199986 and IP CU (kb3197954) in index #1 and 2 Size after resetbase and rebuild = 276 MB (289,781,747 bytes)
Final size: 281 MB. Acceptable. I think it has to do that I serviced both indexes and delta compression comes into play. The slightly larger size? Well I guess it's due to Spanish lang. isos. Thanks @Enthousiast
my first install windows 10 14393.0 then I check windows update just 3 show up. kb3199209, kb3194798(14393.321) and sec update for adobe flash. when I check with windows update mini tool(superseed) just found 3 update for adobe flash, nothing with other windows updates. Its good or not just update that show in windows update? now my windows 14393.321, or I must update it from .105, .187, .189, .222, .223, then .321? thank you
Updates for Windows 10 are cumulative so .321 (Or .351 for release-preview insiders.) contains all the previous ones too thus it's the only one needed. Updates to the servicing stack and adobe flash player are separate though as is the dynamic update or what it was called that you can integrate into the iso (But it's not for installing into the OS itself.) and the monthly virus scan tool is also separate. (Occasionally there's some silverlight update too and of course the definition updates to defender.) But yeah most of the core OS fixes are now bundled together into cumulative singular updates so you only need the latest one as it replaces the previous cumulative update.
thanks for inform, I disable defender then use avast + malwarebyte. first really confused cause this windows eat my internet bandwidht until I realized that windows updates 1607 is different from before(delivery optimization) and change it use old windows update like BITS(bypass delivery optimization and use BITS)
Sorry, it's for KB3199986, not KB3199209 that I was asking, I was wrong So just need to integrate the KB3199986 if I do not use WU (not KB3199209 and KB3176936) ? Thanks
I updated install.wim (anniversary update) with kb3199209, kb3194343 and kb3194798 with dism /add package. Windows installation went ok, but i was offered kb3194798 after executing Windows Update. Same result after creating install.win with Ntlite. Any explanation?
When that announce happen? 10240 and 10586 still CBB, 10240 still LTSB nonetheless, why they bothered to build win10 .net 4.6.2 package in the first place