Windows 10 Hotfix Repository

Discussion in 'Windows 10' started by Tito, Oct 1, 2014.

  1. yomoma2

    yomoma2 MDL Senior Member

    Feb 27, 2010
    365
    124
    10
    It also didn't show on wumt to me. Then forcing a check for updates under settings started to download it.
     
  2. yomoma2

    yomoma2 MDL Senior Member

    Feb 27, 2010
    365
    124
    10
    #4902 yomoma2, Dec 3, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 4, 2017
    KB4051963 has been a nightmare in one of my systems. It installs fine via settings>WU (doesn't show under wumt), and everything is ok. But the problem happens when I either run Dism.exe /online /Cleanup-Image /StartComponentCleanup /ResetBase, use system cleanup to remove windows update files, or let the pc run it's schedule maintenance (that probably does Dism.exe /online /Cleanup-Image /StartComponentCleanup). Then Windows won' be able to boot anymore and throws a Inacessible boot device BSOD. I've found no way to solve it other than using system restore to revert to before the update.

    I'll try updating with the ss + cu .msu instead, to see if it turns out different.
    Update: It does. While installing it doesn't use that % progression in the blue logo screen, it's like older WU updates. Then after the installation, I can do a dism cleanup or run the maintenance taks, and it doesn't cause boot problems. Donno, there might be something in this hardware setup that doesn't like UUP. This is on a very recent clean 1709 installation, btw.
     
  3. Senjanov

    Senjanov MDL Member

    Jul 29, 2011
    217
    44
    10
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  4. Senjanov

    Senjanov MDL Member

    Jul 29, 2011
    217
    44
    10
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  5. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,668
    103,487
    450
    Updates by WU were express downloads and now, at least the CU's, on 16299.15+ they are uup downloads.

    ps, it didn't happen on my laptablet, it is not signed in at the release preview ring.
     
  6. endbase

    endbase MDL Guru

    Aug 12, 2012
    4,694
    1,717
    150
    #4911 endbase, Dec 8, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2017
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  7. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,668
    103,487
    450
  8. abbodi1406

    abbodi1406 MDL KB0000001

    Feb 19, 2011
    17,206
    90,780
    340
    The mix between WU and UUP in 16299 seems to have side effcects
     
  9. yomoma2

    yomoma2 MDL Senior Member

    Feb 27, 2010
    365
    124
    10
    Weird, in the old bios system I've had problems, after downloading on the 2th December (could only get it by forcing settings>windows update>check for updates, it wouldn't show on wumt or via UsoClient.exe StartScan) and installing the CU > pressing restart button, it went to ~17% then rebooted. After this the blue logo loading screen was different, showing a % message at the bottom of the screen, and when it reached 100% it rebooted my system again. Then windows started with .98 installed. After this point, any sort of procedure like Dism.exe /online /Cleanup-Image /StartComponentCleanup, or /ResetBase, run maintenance task or disk cleanup>windows update would leave me with "inaccessible boot device" BSOD on next boot.
    A uefi laptop went through the exact same procedure and caused no trouble.

    Had to do a system restore to before update, and applying this CU via SS+CU .msu caused no problems after the optimization above. It's installation was like the old CU's, until 30% right before manual reboot, and then the remaining 100% at next log on.

    On another old bios system that I've only updated yesterday, the update went completely different. It also didn't show on wumt or via usoclient startscan, but after forcing a check for updates via GUI it installed like CUs used to. After pressing the button to restart it installed until 30%, then it rebooted with the regular blue logo and spinning circle, and then at log on it completed until 100%. No problems after optimization.

    Was this last one a WU installation and the previous (that failed on a old system) via UUP?
     
  10. Senjanov

    Senjanov MDL Member

    Jul 29, 2011
    217
    44
    10
    I dont think its because old bios. but maybe true
    my bios date 2014 v2.1 (no update until now) but smbios 2.8. should be used as uefi not legacy in bios setting
    If using 1703 windows update shows after cek(bios setting uefi/legacy) automatically, but if hit force check update.. feature update to 1709 spamming in distribution updates.. where ss+cu to 1709.98. I think it also include dynamic update
    If using 1709 windows update dont shows(bios setting uefi/legacy) must manual update...because dont show, check with wumpt and other tool(whd show) :D

    I've read abbodi1406 in previous post, I'm forget where the post.. in 1709 windows update different like other windows
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  11. moderate

    moderate MDL Guru

    Aug 31, 2009
    3,465
    2,484
    120
    What mix? :))
     
  12. moderate

    moderate MDL Guru

    Aug 31, 2009
    3,465
    2,484
    120
    Thanks.

    Guys, how can correctly reduce the size of C:\Windows\Installer?

    On W81 arm32 I have added new LP, all KB updates redownloaded and this folder tripled in size. I already removed formerly added LP, but the size of the folder has remained in the huge state.
     
  13. abbodi1406

    abbodi1406 MDL KB0000001

    Feb 19, 2011
    17,206
    90,780
    340
    That folder is used for Office updates, not Windows Updates