This makes no sense. And this is exactly why. Let's say I fire up a virtualbox with 1 core and 2gb of ram. Do the modding and testing and end up with a completely unusable system. Then it seems your claim is false, right? "Ye, but you're not testing on an actual physical machine..." Well, of course, everyone has a spare Atom N450 lying around for testing... Bottom line is, when you make a claim, you should be providing proof, so as to not look like a troll. Even a handful of screenshots of the task manager in both scenarios can be considered as proof of concept. What you're ultimately doing - admirable. The way you're approaching the discussions - not entirely right. Edit 1: This sounds more like "I'm looking to start a s**tstorm.". Edit 2: Also, I hope this thread is not a continuation of your thread about a "commercial" homebrew that was closed quite recently, as you yourself demand proof of concept, even though you were pointed to the source of that construct(the windows edition reconstruction project thread). You're frantically defending an undocumented frankenbuild, while at the same time denying the existence of a documented one.