Windows 7: 64 bit vs 32 bit?

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by libertard, Oct 29, 2009.

  1. libertard

    libertard MDL Junior Member

    Jul 30, 2009
    81
    1
    0
    Not only are there going to be several Windows 7 editions, but you will also need to decide if you are going to run a 32 bit or 64 bit version of the operating system. If your CPU is more than a few years old there is a good chance that you can only run the 32 bit version of Windows 7, however if you have a modern processor you may have to decide between each version.

    The 32 or 64 bit architecture refers to the memory address length that can be referenced by the processor. This also has an impact on the maximum amount of memory that can be utilised, which is 4GB for a 32 bit CPU (but in reality the maximum accessible ram is closer to 3.4 GB due to other hardware allocations).

    Having a 64 bit OS doesn’t automatically make all applications faster because much of today’s software is written and optimised for a 32 bit era. You’ll need software specifically optimised for 64 bit processing to take advantage of any speed improvements. Fortunately, many games are already including such enhancements.

    You may think that using a 64 bit OS for a 64 bit processer is an obvious decision, but it is not so straightforward. Introducing a new architecture will cause new compatibility and driver problems that wouldn’t exist under the old 32 bit version.

    Pros and Cons of a 64 bit system:
    You can address much more than 4GB of memory, which is ideal for avid gamers, CAD, video editors and heavy multi-taskers. However, any 32 bit software you use will still be restricted to 4GB memory – you need a 64 bit CPU, OS and applications to take full advantage of the extra RAM.
    16 bit applications will no longer run. Although this is unlikely to be a problem, if you use very old software (from the Windows 3.1 days!) then it will not work under a 64 bit OS.
    Existing 32 bit drivers no longer work.If you have older or poorly supported hardware you may find that it can no longer be used. Got a 7 year old scanner that just about works in Vista? You may not be able to get it working in 64 bit Windows 7.
    Unsigned kernel-mode drivers no longer work. Along with the issue above, the inability to run unsigned kernel mode drivers will cause problems for old hardware. (There is reportedly a way to bypass this check).
    Running some 32 bit applications on a 64 bit OS could actually be slower. The additional overheads in running 32 bit software in 64 bit mode could cause a slight degradation in performance. It will take some time for 64 bit software to become the norm.
    The conclusion? Well, it depends on what you use your system for. If you have a 64 bit capable CPU but use older hardware, it would be safe to stay with a 32 bit version for the time being to ensure that you don’t need extra upgrades.

    If you’ve got the latest hardware and drivers are available, then it would be worth while taking the step up to a 64 bit OS. If you regularly work with resource hungry applications that are 64 bit optimised (such as video editing, CAD and image packages) then it would be especially beneficial to be able to work with over 4GB of RAM amongst the other improvements.

    In the not too distant future, 64 bit computing will be a common standard – as all hardware from the last couple of years has been designed with this in mind. Until a complete upgrade cycle has passed for the majority of users, there is still a strong case for some users to stick with 32 bit Windows for the time being. Once more 64 bit applications start to appear, it would be a good time to make the switch to the new architecture.
     
  2. RobsTV

    RobsTV MDL Novice

    Aug 19, 2009
    26
    2
    0
    #2 RobsTV, Oct 29, 2009
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2009
    Also use Google to get answers.

    1. Google "How much memory do I need"
    2. Google "does 4 gigs of memory help in games"
    3. Google " 64bit gaming benchmarks"

    64bit is great tool for increasing hardware and software sales, so it is pushed very hard by those that will profit off of it, as if it is something you need or will soon need.

    The answers to those google searches will show:
    1. Two gig is more than enough for most, and 3 gig for very hard core gamers.

    2. No. Going from 1 gig to 2 gig helps a lot. Very little is gained going from 2 gig to 3 gig. Even less above that.

    3. 64bit gaming is not much of an improvement (if any) in speed for the few games that utilize it. In fact, many modern games perform better and faster with 32bit and 3 gig than they do with 64bit (optimized version of software) and 6 gigs of ram. (see googled results). Not only is gaming performance not worthy of switching to 64bit, you might find that your favorite gaming controller is not compatible with the 64bit OS.

    For heavy duty professional video editing 64bit and more than 4 gig is important.

    I've got an X10 HTPC remote control using Girder and a serial port. No 64bit. That's enough for me to stay with 32bit. Compatibility, which falls into that group of push 64bit to sell more stuff.