Windows 7 Hotfix repository

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by SoLoR, May 22, 2010.

  1. btf-tribal

    btf-tribal MDL Junior Member

    Jul 9, 2009
    70
    12
    0
    some updates are *.exe files.
    were these updates also included in your
    Microsoft .NET Framework v4.0.30320 Client - Updated Aug 10, 2011 - 39.5MB???


    NDP40-KB2160841-x64.exe
    NDP40-KB2416472-x64.exe
    NDP40-KB2446708-x64.exe
    NDP40-KB2468871-v2-x64.exe
    NDP40-KB2487367-x64.exe
    NDP40-KB2533523-x64.exe
    NDP40-KB2539636-x64.exe
     
  2. ricktendo64

    ricktendo64 MDL Expert

    Apr 20, 2008
    1,396
    2,025
    60
    Because you did not follow my instructions, I posted what you had to do and included a readme
     
  3. Trinket

    Trinket MDL Senior Member

    Feb 20, 2010
    485
    169
    10
    Actually those KB's are also in .msp format as far as I can see, and yes some of these KB's are included. Others on the list you mention seem superseded already. Unless we missed something it should be up to date.

    @Ricktendo: To be honest I do that and then see a huge list of things that is unintelligible to me. So for now we have an ugly uninstall icon ;)
     
  4. digital john

    digital john MDL Senior Member

    Mar 30, 2008
    265
    69
    10
    hallo, anyone having problem downloading x64 sp1 hotfixes?
    i can't download, except x86
     
  5. Snuffy

    Snuffy MDL Expert

    Jan 7, 2008
    1,272
    630
    60
    401 - Unauthorized: Access is denied due to invalid credentials.

    You do not have permission to view this directory or page using the credentials that you supplied.
    is all i get when trying to access the site..
     
  6. Trinket

    Trinket MDL Senior Member

    Feb 20, 2010
    485
    169
    10
    I agree it's not complicated after your explanation just now ;) OK, I'll see what I can do :D
     
  7. ricktendo64

    ricktendo64 MDL Expert

    Apr 20, 2008
    1,396
    2,025
    60
    I suspect the cause of the error is due to either the DisplayIcon.ico file listed in the File table or some other Setup file but did not have the time to sort out deleting them one by one (its better to delete the files anyway since their components have bee removed and they serve no purpose, it doesn't hurt to leave them either in other situations)
     
  8. Trinket

    Trinket MDL Senior Member

    Feb 20, 2010
    485
    169
    10
    OK, good to know. Working on it now, wish me luck :biggrin:
     
  9. Trinket

    Trinket MDL Senior Member

    Feb 20, 2010
    485
    169
    10
    Rick, after deleting all the Installer_*, NetFxRepair_* and SetupUtility_* entries under Components, I still get that error running the administrative install. So unless you have any advice I'll leave it as it is for now.
     
  10. Trinket

    Trinket MDL Senior Member

    Feb 20, 2010
    485
    169
    10
    Yeah, same thing Rick, I think either more needs to be deleted besides those 3 Component entries or something else is wrong. It's saying it 'appears to be a MSI package but extraction failed' during administrative install.
     
  11. Trinket

    Trinket MDL Senior Member

    Feb 20, 2010
    485
    169
    10
    SoLoR: just a note, the following 2 updates were preset in the previous x86 pack of August 10 but not the current revised list you uploaded (the folder with loose x86 updates):

    Windows6.1-KB2205122-v2-x86.msu
    Windows6.1-KB2397190-x86.msu

    But the x64 versions of these updates are present in your revised x64 folders so I'm assuming you accidentally did not re-upload them to the resvised x86 folder?
     
  12. kpo6969

    kpo6969 MDL Member

    Mar 15, 2010
    180
    45
    10
    Same here

    Same here
     
  13. burfadel

    burfadel MDL EXE>MSP/CAB

    Aug 19, 2009
    2,626
    3,856
    90
    No issues here...
     
  14. burfadel

    burfadel MDL EXE>MSP/CAB

    Aug 19, 2009
    2,626
    3,856
    90
    Looks like a whole lot more updates and some new versions of existing updates released :) Of course, its up to SoLoR when they get done, there are too many to go through manually!
     
  15. burfadel

    burfadel MDL EXE>MSP/CAB

    Aug 19, 2009
    2,626
    3,856
    90
    The 120-120-71 is correct :) When installing the LDR versions of updates the GDR version also needs to be installed for continuity, so the updates that contain both GDR and LDR versions get tallied as 2 updates and are installed separately which is a required function of installing it without using the MSU file.

    The following is just an example and does not reflect the actual GDR and LDR update numbers.

    Say there are 200 updates total, and 111 of them contain both GDR and LDR updates. If you were just to install the update.mum file, meaning the GDR versions (or LDR only), you would install just 200 of them. If you were to force install the LDR versions as well (which the installer does), you need to install the update-bf.mum files, of which in this example there are 111. So, in total, you are installing 311 updates.

    The updates are split into 120 update lots, otherwise the dism command line gets too long! I might change the title bar to reflect the number of GDR, LDR, and total, something along the lines of 'List 1 of 3, Updates: GDR 200, LDR 111, Total 311'