Windows 7 Hotfix repository

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by SoLoR, May 22, 2010.

  1. dolivas

    dolivas MDL Junior Member

    Jan 31, 2008
    51
    23
    0
  2. SoLoR

    SoLoR MDL Expert

    Jul 30, 2008
    1,371
    1,256
    60
    good ill upload this to the repo then, if you allow... this is pretty much what i tough of doing but didnt find time...
     
  3. GLYUKOZA

    GLYUKOZA MDL Novice

    Apr 4, 2011
    49
    12
    0
    On the Win7. Removed update(with help Superseded Uninstaller) on x64 constantly flashed sign - a mistake 11 incompatibility 32 and 64 bit dism.
     
  4. burfadel

    burfadel MDL EXE>MSP/CAB

    Aug 19, 2009
    2,626
    3,856
    90
    The superseded uninstaller runs dism from the Windows\System32 folder. On 32-bit systems, this is the 32-bit version, and on x64 systems it is the 64-bit version. On x64 systems, the 32-bit dism is located in the Windows\syswow64 folder. What it sounds like is for some reason your dism in the system32 folder has been overwritten by the 32-bit version which should be in the syswow64 folder, causing that issue to show. This shouldn't have happened normally, most likely it was manually replaced or stuffed up by a third party tool of some kind.
     
  5. hanschke

    hanschke MDL Senior Member

    Jan 8, 2008
    425
    33
    10
    @GLYUKOZA

    i dont know if i will do it again. x86 i dont use and so i dont collect the kb for this. we will see.
     
  6. GLYUKOZA

    GLYUKOZA MDL Novice

    Apr 4, 2011
    49
    12
    0
    @hanschke
    Would be very grateful.
     
  7. GLYUKOZA

    GLYUKOZA MDL Novice

    Apr 4, 2011
    49
    12
    0
    @burfadel

    Thanks for the clarification.
     
  8. ricktendo64

    ricktendo64 MDL Expert

    Apr 20, 2008
    1,396
    2,025
    60
    You are welcome to do so
     
  9. SoLoR

    SoLoR MDL Expert

    Jul 30, 2008
    1,371
    1,256
    60
    Thanks... works like a charm, however i did notice one thing... applyed updates do not show up in update list... intentional?
     
  10. ricktendo64

    ricktendo64 MDL Expert

    Apr 20, 2008
    1,396
    2,025
    60
    Not on my part, side effect...they cannot be uninstalled so they are useless showing up in the first place
     
  11. digital john

    digital john MDL Senior Member

    Mar 30, 2008
    265
    69
    10
    so, there are no updates this sunday?
     
  12. SoLoR

    SoLoR MDL Expert

    Jul 30, 2008
    1,371
    1,256
    60
    refresh :) not sure why but lately it takes about half of day more to scan for updates...
     
  13. Trinket

    Trinket MDL Senior Member

    Feb 20, 2010
    487
    169
    10
    Ricktendo, using your slim NET4, I noticed the Windows\Microsoft.NET folder as you included it in the slim archive is around 300mb, whereas if we perform an administrative install of the .msi's (after applying the hotfixes) via UniExtract that folder is around 225mb. This results in the .7z archive of the x64-x86 files being around 47mb when not doing an administrative install, and around 40mb if we use the msi administrative install method.

    Which method do you think we should use when making an installer out of it? I tested the installer made out of the non-administative install files and it works just fine, only the installer is around 47mb of course, as compared to the 40mb one we're used to. What do you think is best to use?
     
  14. ricktendo64

    ricktendo64 MDL Expert

    Apr 20, 2008
    1,396
    2,025
    60
    #2916 ricktendo64, Sep 19, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 20, 2017
    Original is bigger because it contains both Client and Extended files, (let me guess) you ONLY did a admin of the client...if you dont want extended files do a second admin install to leave the unneeded files behind

    BTW I am working on a MST that will satisfy WU when it comes to KB2468871, these are the x86 full registry entries (I dont have the x64 entries because my laptop is dead)

    Code:
    Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
    
    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\5C1093C35543A0E32A41B090A305076A\Patches\4A3FC9E53BDA08038AFB79A682437085]
    "State"=dword:00000001
    
    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\FCDAC0A0AD874C333A05DC1548B97920\Patches\4A3FC9E53BDA08038AFB79A682437085]
    "State"=dword:00000001
     
  15. dolivas

    dolivas MDL Junior Member

    Jan 31, 2008
    51
    23
    0
    #2917 dolivas, Sep 19, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 20, 2017
    Hey ricktendo64 thanks for pointing me in the right direction here is the location for x64 I just tested it and it works perfect on my end.

    Code:
    Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
    
    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\DFC90B5F2B0FFA63D84FD16F6BF37C4B\Patches\79EB7C9295ED2A736A78A2DD351249A8]
    "State"=dword:00000001
     
  16. ricktendo64

    ricktendo64 MDL Expert

    Apr 20, 2008
    1,396
    2,025
    60
    #2918 ricktendo64, Sep 19, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 20, 2017
    Thats client right, what is the extendeds product number?
     
  17. tistou77

    tistou77 MDL Expert

    Mar 22, 2008
    1,990
    629
    60
    about updating KB2584577, mfc42.dll and mfc42u.dll files have version 6.6.8064.0
    but the files in system32 have the same version (same KB2506212)

    why upgarde?

    thanks :)
     
  18. dolivas

    dolivas MDL Junior Member

    Jan 31, 2008
    51
    23
    0
    You know I never install the extended I guess I should start I will get those for you later this evening when I make the updated installer after I add the updates to the MSI's then do an administrative install of the 4 MSI which ProgramsFilesFolder & Windows folders do I use before I 7z the files?

    Thanks,
    dolivas