Windows 7 Hotfix repository

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by SoLoR, May 22, 2010.

  1. komm

    komm MDL Addicted

    Jun 16, 2011
    894
    3,063
    30
  2. burfadel

    burfadel MDL EXE>MSP/CAB

    Aug 19, 2009
    2,627
    3,856
    90
    Update KB2607496-v3 in Komm's non-superseded folder is also newer and valid. It should be pointed out that most of the updates there are for server, or for RTM that appear applyable but not applicable to SP1 and aren't committed when installed.
     
  3. Asim Omer

    Asim Omer MDL Member

    Jan 28, 2011
    104
    6
    10
    Does KB2633171 superseded by any update?
     
  4. GLYUKOZA

    GLYUKOZA MDL Novice

    Apr 4, 2011
    49
    12
    0
    If you run Superseded Uninstaller 11-Jan-2012 from folder Old Update Remover W7 SP1 11-Jan-2012 on behalf of the administrator leaves a message saying that List.txt and others located in the Lists. And in case of a simple run this file, then exits that when I choose an item 1, it reports error 740, DISM need rights with elevated privileges. How to run Superseded Uninstaller 11-Jan-2012.cmd?

    If the question is asked, poke me back to answer, please.
     
  5. komm

    komm MDL Addicted

    Jun 16, 2011
    894
    3,063
    30
    Can you give me a list of those, so i can remove them.
     
  6. komm

    komm MDL Addicted

    Jun 16, 2011
    894
    3,063
    30
    Small update to hotfix-list out.
    Thanks to pointzero who found the mistake in 2615128 (I forgot to update the version of shell).
     
  7. burfadel

    burfadel MDL EXE>MSP/CAB

    Aug 19, 2009
    2,627
    3,856
    90
    KB958488 definitely shouldn't be required, not sure why it showed up in Windowsupdate for you but then again, KB947821 has to be useful for something?!

    As for the rest of them, some of the other KB9x updates may be redundant, it seems strange Microsoft didn't include some of them in Service Pack 1 or at least release newer SP1 pack versions. Either way, almost all of the updates are useless for most people, maybe the server specific updates in one download file, and the new valid Win 7 updates in another? or at least, some variation thereof?
     
  8. tistou77

    tistou77 MDL Expert

    Mar 22, 2008
    1,822
    573
    60
    I removed the service "Offline" in windows 7 if I don't install the update KB2610379-v2 that includes the file "shell32.dll" (version of 21864)
    it's not a problem?

    if I install the KB2615128-v3 and the version of shell32.dll is 21869

    thanks :)
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  9. burfadel

    burfadel MDL EXE>MSP/CAB

    Aug 19, 2009
    2,627
    3,856
    90
    The files in 958488 are versioned 6.2.7600.16513 whereas for SP1 they are versioned 6.2.7601.17514. They are located in the WinSxS folder, since the files in the system32 folder are versioned 4.0.40305.0 with SP1. I believe it tries to install because its detecting that its newer, 4.0.40305.0 --> 6.2.7600.16513, and that its not detecting the 6.2.7601.17514 versioned files. I don't know why the filenames are like that, since 4.0.40305.0 and 6.2.7601.17514 are both part of SP1, but in any case, the 6.2.7600.16513 KB958488 files are outdated!

    The separate folder for those updates to be added to the repository is exactly what I meant :) thought it would come in handy!
     
  10. ricktendo64

    ricktendo64 MDL Expert

    Apr 20, 2008
    1,397
    2,024
    60
    KB000000 link points to correct year 2012 but your actual archive on the repo has 2011
     
  11. SoLoR

    SoLoR MDL Expert

    Jul 30, 2008
    1,370
    1,256
    60
    ups.... fixed :)
     
  12. komm

    komm MDL Addicted

    Jun 16, 2011
    894
    3,063
    30
    The version of SP1 is not 6.2.7601.17514 it is 6.1.7601.17514, maybe that's the problem.
    The version 4.xxx could represent .Net 4 updates.

    Anyway, I checked the DVDs which have 958488 included and saw:
    They all have .Net 4 preinstalled.
    MS installed 958488 before SP1.
    The files in the system32 dir are the files from SP1 (not the ones from 958488)

    I also checked the registry changes defined in 958488 on an clean installation (no updates installed)
    all entries are already there.

    I additionally checked the .Net 4 installer for Server Core, which is designed for SP1 only.
    I thought 9584488 could be missing, but it also installs the 958488. I don't know why.
    That will remain one of MS's secrets.

    I also tried to reproduce the "update" is missing popup for 958488, can't! (If somebody could, please inform!)


    So 958488 applies, but does nothing if SP1 is installed.
    Therefore, I think it is save to declare 958488 as an update for RTM.

    By the way, the version number of an update is not a sufficient condition. It's only an indication.
    MS Agent has 6.1.7600.16426 and most additions have a "7600" version too.
     
  13. joflomo

    joflomo MDL Novice

    Dec 2, 2011
    33
    25
    0
    I agree to burfadel, that would be perfect.
     
  14. burfadel

    burfadel MDL EXE>MSP/CAB

    Aug 19, 2009
    2,627
    3,856
    90
    Thats exactly what I was thinking. Don't know why there is this odd version numbering (I think there's other files like this too), not to mention the 7.1.7601.x file numbering!
     
  15. RickSteele

    RickSteele MDL Addicted

    Nov 12, 2009
    833
    483
    30
    Hey burfadel,
    Windows Updates V23c: with the online changed to offline as per your instructions earlier in this thread works beautifully integrating SoLor's repository into my sysprepped Windows 7 Ultimate x64 image-very nice! :)
     
  16. burfadel

    burfadel MDL EXE>MSP/CAB

    Aug 19, 2009
    2,627
    3,856
    90
    Thanks :)

    I just started on the integration feature, its going to be a little more advanced than just a simple reference change (which is why I haven't yet included it). Can't give an ETA on a test version date, I'm working on it bit by bit :)

    It will work on an extracted iso (not mounted), and will:
    - Automatically mount the Install.wim
    - Ask which index to process (or you can select to process all...)
    - Process
    - Unmount
    - Mount, process, and unmount boot.wim if answered yes to the question of whether you want them processed too, upon which the WinPE index and Setup is also updated using the same lists. This would be done before integrating Install.wim. Many of the updates aren't applicable, which won't matter, DISM will just skip them (and show an error line at the end of the list for each update that got skipped). Looks a little messy on screen, but thats all :)
    - Update the setup servicing stack files in the sources folder (not the WIM files which don't update, which is known)
    - Able to integrate x86 Windows on x64 and vice versa.