Windows 7 Hotfix repository

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by SoLoR, May 22, 2010.

  1. PointZero

    PointZero MDL Member

    Oct 5, 2011
    1,415
    3,777
    60
    Thank you very much komm. Since I'm the one who asked you for this, I'll go through the list and try to figure out how the newest updates affect the repo.

    Another option- I may just do a fresh install of Win7, add the current repo contents and then use KUC to track what's new/superseded. I did this earlier but didn't track every update that was installed/uninstalled.
     
  2. Trinket

    Trinket MDL Senior Member

    Feb 20, 2010
    487
    169
    10
    Thanks, burfadel.

    Yes, hence the difficulty because, as you say, such an installer would be hard to find with the vc runtimes; and evidently not always foolproof even when you could find it.

    It's no problem at all, people who like to tweak and play with computers should be prepared for some problems here and there ;) I'll do a restore and give myself a clean slate. I always usde Active@ Disk Image from within a PE, and since the latest version of it restores and backups are handled rather quickly. Paired with my new sata3 SSD it took 1:40 to restore the complete x64 Win7 OS including applications... Wow. Otherwise, for testing VM's are of course good, but I'd also like it to work on my real install atm.

    Thanks for the information.
     
  3. burfadel

    burfadel MDL EXE>MSP/CAB

    Aug 19, 2009
    2,626
    3,856
    90
    1 hour 40 minutes, or 1 minute 40 seconds?

    1 minute 40 seconds sounds pretty good :)
     
  4. PointZero

    PointZero MDL Member

    Oct 5, 2011
    1,415
    3,777
    60
    Here's the changelog I see needed for the repo. This list should be considered a starting point for getting the repo current since there's probably an error or two (or more). Once this batch gets uploaded, we can test and refine it further. Also, I did this on x64, so there might be a couple differences for x86. All thanks should go to komm and SoLoR since they're the ones doing the hard work on this.

    SoLoR, if this info isn't sufficient, let me know and I'll try to add detail as needed.

    Add:
    951422-v2 (partially superseded by 2647409)
    2461249
    2519922-v2
    2524478-v2
    2525835
    2582203-v2
    2603469
    2619836
    2627489-v3
    2633200
    2633205
    2636056-v2
    2640696
    2644491
    2646168
    2649905
    2652029
    2652246
    2652553
    2653030
    2653312
    2653385
    2654363
    2655087
    2657025
    2659071
    2659158
    2660114
    2661001
    2661641
    2661663
    2661672
    2661794
    2661796-v2
    2662288
    2662585
    2663352
    2663418
    2664055
    2664408-v2
    2664446
    2664888
    2669522
    2675469

    Superseded:
    2401588 (by 2661001)
    2491683 (by 2644491)
    2507840 (by 2633205)
    2512889 (by 2659071)
    2515325 (by 2664055)
    2519922 (by 2519922-v2)
    2534111 (by 2652029)
    2553549 (by 2655087)
    2561708 (by 2649905)
    2569339 (by 2664446)
    2578963 (by 2633200)
    2580442 (by 2653030)
    2584146 (by 2636056-v2)
    2598773 (by 2669522)
    2614122 (by 2662288)
    2624641 (by 2524478-v2)
    2627484 (by 2627489-v3)
    2633952 (by 2657025)
    2635217 (by 2654428)
    2646761 (by 2654363)
    2647841 (by 2603469)
    2649868 (by 2663352)
    2660465 (by 2661001)
    2661663 (by 2664408-v2)
    2654347 (by 2675469)
     
  5. burfadel

    burfadel MDL EXE>MSP/CAB

    Aug 19, 2009
    2,626
    3,856
    90
    Yes those versions are correct :) I was meant to also put in the last post that even though the file versions for 2005 redist are 8.0.20727.6229, it shows as 8.0.61186 (for x64) and 8.0.61187 (for x86) in add/remove programs :)

    A side note to anyone that may be confused as to why x86 and x64 versions show on x64 system, the x86 versions are used by 32-bit programs, and the x64 versions by 64-bit programs. On x64, you need both installed so both 32-bit and 64-bit programs are covered.
     
  6. burfadel

    burfadel MDL EXE>MSP/CAB

    Aug 19, 2009
    2,626
    3,856
    90
    A couple of things I seeL
    KB2519922 (V2) not needed. The V2 is available alongside the original version, the difference being V2 includes the GDR files as well, whereas the original version only the LDR files (same versions of the LDR files in original and V2).
    KB951422-V2 seems to be valid, must have been missed earlier.
    KB2640696 is KB2640696-V3, not just KB2640696
    KB2661663 is KB2661663-V3, not just KB2661663
    KB2675469 links are requestable, but not downloadable (file not found error)
     
  7. PointZero

    PointZero MDL Member

    Oct 5, 2011
    1,415
    3,777
    60
    You're correct on all, burf! Thank you for looking at the list.
     
  8. komm

    komm MDL Addicted

    Jun 16, 2011
    894
    3,069
    30
    Maybe, but we should always take the latest version. So move 2519922-v1 to LDR placeholder and take 2519922-v2. Or will your installer tell the user to uninstall v2 and install v1?
    We should not discuss about "not taking an update with a higher version number"!
    If 2 different kb# updates contain the same version we can decide witch one to take. But it should be a rule to always take the highest version#.

    Kb2675469 is a .net update. There seams to be a problem of downloading this kind of updates with the strange link. I saw that in the last view weeks. You must try as long as you can and then, suddenly, it can be downloaded. Nevertheless, it can be found in my win7 folder.

    @PointZero
    Thanks for your quick work.

    2647841: only the x64 version is superseded.
    you missed 2644615 in the superseded updates (replaced by 2582203)
    2661663-v3 is superseded by 2664408
    2554746 is superseded by 2665875 (MSMQ)




    "partially superseded" we should not use this kind; only YES or NO like pregnancy.


    If nobody else found a problem in pointzero's list, someboy else should create a .7z with all the new updates.
    So SoLoR can download it. I think he would prever the -zip.exe files so the filedates are preserved.
    This .7z must not be public only send Solor the link.
     
  9. digital john

    digital john MDL Senior Member

    Mar 30, 2008
    265
    69
    10
    hi burf,
    question, so u never change the office update script?
     
  10. McRip

    McRip MDL Addicted

    Aug 15, 2011
    935
    3,418
    30
    2852203 must be KB2582203-v2.

    Cheers
     
  11. burfadel

    burfadel MDL EXE>MSP/CAB

    Aug 19, 2009
    2,626
    3,856
    90
    No, haven't needed to! apart from a few code 'cosmetics' that I could do, there really isn't anything that needs changing.
     
  12. steven4554

    steven4554 MDL Expert

    Jul 12, 2009
    1,593
    3,099
    60
    Yes, but i think you'd be better off using burf's Office installer script.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  13. RickSteele

    RickSteele MDL Addicted

    Nov 12, 2009
    833
    483
    30
    No, use the Office cmd from Burf.
     
  14. dippyweb

    dippyweb MDL Member

    Oct 3, 2011
    177
    175
    10
    Any new kernel update ? :/ last one is 7601.21866.111123-1509 TOO OLD :D
     
  15. PointZero

    PointZero MDL Member

    Oct 5, 2011
    1,415
    3,777
    60
    I added the updates you suggested, uploaded the batch of the original .zip versions of the updates (except for 3 that are in .msu format) and sent links to SoLoR via PM.
     
  16. digital john

    digital john MDL Senior Member

    Mar 30, 2008
    265
    69
    10
    excellent work pointzero,
    keep it up....thanx for your hard work :)