Windows 7 Hotfix repository

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by SoLoR, May 22, 2010.

  1. its

    its MDL Junior Member

    Sep 13, 2007
    86
    0
    0
    #5401 its, Jun 9, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 20, 2017
    got everything working and integrated guys

    but

    when I use

    Code:
    imagex /export /check /compress fast c:\wu\iso\sources\install.wim * c:\wu\iso\sources\install2.wim
    
    it fails at random times with

    Code:
    ImageX Tool for Windows
    Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp. All rights reserved.
    Version: 6.1.7600.16385
    
    Exporting: [c:\wu\iso\sources\install.wim, *] ->
               [c:\wu\iso\sources\install2.wim]
    
    
    [  50% ] Exporting progress: 4:43 mins remaining
    Error exporting image #1.
    
    Access is denied.
    
    Fails at 30% 43% etc.. have opened the WAIK command prompt with admin privilidges.. install.wim has 2 images in it.. i have tested a ISO with that and works fine

    I just want to compress it so it fits in 1 DVD.. currently the ISO becomes 5GB

    Any alternate ways / GUI to compress install .wim ??

    Thanks

    EDIT: FIXED.. I had to disable MSE (antivirus)

    BUT the fast compress install.wim is actually bigger than the original created by tool.. bummer..

    will try max compression. don't look like i will be able to fit in 1 DVD (2 images.. ultimate 32 and 64bit with all hotfixes till date)
     
  2. komm

    komm MDL Addicted

    Jun 16, 2011
    894
    3,069
    30
    Just some notes:
    1. Use an USB stick instead of a DVD; the installation of Win7 is much faster using an USB stick than using a DVD.
    2. Start with a clean DVD image(no updates installed) and only add the latest updates. Adding/removing/adding/removing... makes the images bigger and bigger.
    (my reference DVD image for x86 is about 9gb now)
    3. Using a RAM disk for upate integration can speed up the process.
    When using a RAM disk, also set the %TMP% and %TEMP% values to it. BUT only do that in the batch, so this change only affects the dism process.
     
  3. superleeds27

    superleeds27 MDL Member

    Nov 24, 2007
    131
    4
    10
    Anyone know when the .7Z will be updated?
     
  4. ricktendo64

    ricktendo64 MDL Expert

    Apr 20, 2008
    1,396
    2,025
    60
    komm can I have the link for FULL WUA v7.6.7600.256 (need it for XP)
     
  5. ricktendo64

    ricktendo64 MDL Expert

    Apr 20, 2008
    1,396
    2,025
    60
    By FULL I mean WindowsUpdateAgent30*.exe, this is for XP as well
     
  6. komm

    komm MDL Addicted

    Jun 16, 2011
    894
    3,069
    30
    #5408 komm, Jun 9, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 20, 2017
  7. RickSteele

    RickSteele MDL Addicted

    Nov 12, 2009
    833
    483
    30
    Can anyhone provide a download link for the .NET 4.5 hotfix?

    Thanks :worthy:
     
  8. steven4554

    steven4554 MDL Expert

    Jul 12, 2009
    1,637
    3,246
    60
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  9. avechuche

    avechuche MDL Junior Member

    May 10, 2012
    73
    30
    0
    These updates say have been deleted, but still appear in the page. Is it a mistake?

    2619331 removed (superseded)
    2675469 removed (superseded)
     
  10. Trinket

    Trinket MDL Senior Member

    Feb 20, 2010
    485
    169
    10
    Weirdest thing, when I made a x86 image with all x86 updates integrated (offline), I got WU offering the following updates in my VM install:

    KB2633171, KB2585542

    The x64 build I had done earlier did not ask for these updates. BTW, neither my x64 or x86 updates collection contain those 2 updates, and I don't see them in the McRip x86 repo either (or any mention of them in the change log).

    So for some reason WU was offering them on the x86 install in my case. I've added them back into my personal x86 collection for now.
     
  11. komm

    komm MDL Addicted

    Jun 16, 2011
    894
    3,069
    30
    Thanks, for checking
    i removed them
     
  12. komm

    komm MDL Addicted

    Jun 16, 2011
    894
    3,069
    30
    You can find both of the on my server.
    2633171 is normal on x86
    2585542 is superseded by 2695401 and 2654875. did you install both?
     
  13. Trinket

    Trinket MDL Senior Member

    Feb 20, 2010
    485
    169
    10
    Ah, thank you :biggrin: For some reason, 2695401 was not present in my x86 folder, so I believe that explains that.

    2633171 I will keep in the x86 folder then.

    Solved :bananajoj2:
     
  14. superleeds27

    superleeds27 MDL Member

    Nov 24, 2007
    131
    4
    10
    IE10 RC ny good for Win7?