Windows 7 Hotfix repository

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by SoLoR, May 22, 2010.

  1. komm

    komm MDL Addicted

    Jun 16, 2011
    894
    3,067
    30
    The problem only occures for offline installations.
     
  2. tistou77

    tistou77 MDL Expert

    Mar 22, 2008
    1,989
    629
    60
    If we integrate this hotfix to ISO?
    If so, I would see the next integration
     
  3. komm

    komm MDL Addicted

    Jun 16, 2011
    894
    3,067
    30
    repo and changlogs updated
    new KUC will be released tomorrow
     
  4. McRip

    McRip MDL Addicted

    Aug 15, 2011
    935
    3,418
    30
    @Pointzero: Double checked everthing. Here the complete list.
    Windows 7 x64
    10.08.2012

    Added:

    KB2607863 (Additional/RSAT)
    KB2616142
    KB2721259

    Removed:
    KB2462585-v2 (Additional/RSAT)
    -----------------------------------

    Windows 7 x86:
    Added:

    KB2607863 (Additional/RSAT)
    KB2616142
    KB2721259
     
  5. PointZero

    PointZero MDL Member

    Oct 5, 2011
    1,415
    3,777
    60
    KB2462585-v2 should be left in. KB2462137-v2 is the one to remove. (Might also want to note that KB2721259 is -v2.) Other than that, all looks good!
     
  6. McRip

    McRip MDL Addicted

    Aug 15, 2011
    935
    3,418
    30
    Now it's correct.I just interchanged the figures... Time to go to bed.
     
  7. drizzle

    drizzle MDL Novice

    Aug 22, 2009
    44
    115
    0
    oops ... I think the Cesidian x86 folder has the x64 version of kb2616242
     
  8. RicaNeaga

    RicaNeaga MDL Senior Member

    Apr 25, 2011
    252
    451
    10
    For the current updates in McRip's repository, to satisfy WU you wil need the following updates to add to an offline image (I've never used the method to install them on a live system):

    For x64 - KB2547666, KB2644615, KB2676562 and KB2709715.

    For x86 - KB2547666, KB2644615, KB2676562 and KB2567680.


    @McRip How about re-adding the Satisfy WU folder in the additional folder? I think it would be very useful for a lot of people. :)
     
  9. tistou77

    tistou77 MDL Expert

    Mar 22, 2008
    1,989
    629
    60
    komm, about it

    I did not understand why it is removed

    Thanks
     
  10. komm

    komm MDL Addicted

    Jun 16, 2011
    894
    3,067
    30
    If one of those updates is added to the boot.wim (image 2) the setup asks for a DVD/CD driver if you install win7 from a DVD.
    I removed them from the DVD folder which contains files for the boot.wim images.
     
  11. tistou77

    tistou77 MDL Expert

    Mar 22, 2008
    1,989
    629
    60
    Ah ok, it's just for the boot.wim (not for install.wim)

    Thanks
     
  12. komm

    komm MDL Addicted

    Jun 16, 2011
    894
    3,067
    30
    2462585 is still current
    2462137 is superseded by 2607863 and 2462585.

    ups pointzero has allready posted.
     
  13. McRip

    McRip MDL Addicted

    Aug 15, 2011
    935
    3,418
    30
    Also KB2656356 has to be removed:

    11.08.2012

    Removed:
    KB2610379-v2
    KB2656356
    KB2698707
     
  14. McRip

    McRip MDL Addicted

    Aug 15, 2011
    935
    3,418
    30
    I would say NO.

    It is absolutely useless to satisfy Windows Update and then to have older file versions on the computer. Just hide those updates from Windows Update.
    And I would never integrate such updates into my offline image. That's a total nonsense. Thankfully Windows 8 acts correctly now. I does not show up an update anymore if u install it in LDR/QFE mode. A real progress.
    That also means, windows Update is not working properly to me.
     
  15. komm

    komm MDL Addicted

    Jun 16, 2011
    894
    3,067
    30
    2698707 still up to date
     
  16. tistou77

    tistou77 MDL Expert

    Mar 22, 2008
    1,989
    629
    60
    The KB2610379-v2 and KB2698707 is replaced by which hotfix?

    Thanks

    EDIT: KB2698707 in not superseded, ok
     
  17. RicaNeaga

    RicaNeaga MDL Senior Member

    Apr 25, 2011
    252
    451
    10
    Ok. Let me put it like this.

    1. Your way - you don't have them in the additional folder. User Rick is a beginner, finds out about your repository from Win Toolkit, integrates everything to an offline image, except those WU satisfying updates, is happy to install the resulted image to a live system, but finds out when scanning WU that some updates are needed. What do you think he'll do? Search this 600+ pages thread to see if they're needed or just install them and thus having old versions of some files on the hdd?

    2. My way - beginner user Rick integrates also those updates via Win Toolkit (DISM), that sorts them alphabetically, so NO older & unneeded versions is kept on the resulted image. User Rick then installs windows and everything is ok, also with WU.

    I won't argue with you, as I've seen before it's useless, once you've set your mind on something it's like that, flexible isn't something I can say about you. So this post is redundant, as the needed effect - to make you see why those updates are needed, I think just can't happen. :( Let's just hope I'm wrong about this...
     
  18. komm

    komm MDL Addicted

    Jun 16, 2011
    894
    3,067
    30