I does not matter in this case. Because IE installer looks for the GDR installed version. Prerequisites are for software that is neccessary to work properly. I have installed IE 10 with all prerequisites and I don't have any problems. But I must admit that I installed the prerequisites in LDR mode and used the .cab version of IE 10 for installing. Also AERO is working properly. And also installed the two security updates for IE10
McRip would it be possible to still maintain the IE9 files on the Repo along with the IE10... I'm not sure if everyone is going to be switching to IE10 right away
Strange that these prerequisites is obligatory, while most of the files in the hotfix are older than those already installed
1. So, should I uninstall both KB2792100 and kB2797052 before installing IE 10? 2. To create an offline Windows image slipstreamed with latest updates, we do not have to integrate both KB2792100 & kb2797052 into it, right? 3. Can I still install superseded prerequisite for IE10 (KB2729094-v2) in my computer, even though it is superseded? 4. Similar to what bapt said, do we still need to integrate superseded prerequisites for IE10 into an offline Windows image? Thanks for the information.
1. McRip has installed them with IE10 with no problems, but those updates really don't apply to the final version of IE10. Anyway. it's up to you at the end of the day. 2. Again it's up to you, personally i wouldn't bother to integrate them. 3. Didn't know that update had been superseded, but you can still integrate it though. 4. No.
uhm, sorry for being newbie at this but, can i use the install.cmd from windows 7 updates to windows 8 coz there is nothing in there for windows 8..
At the moment no, but when time allows i'm sure McRip will release a install.cmd to allow Win8 updates to be installed.
If I understand, no need to integrate prerequisites for IE10 if we integrate IE10 to ISO then? McRip, the KB2792100 & KB2797052 are superseded with IE10 final, right? Thanks
The only prerequisite for IE10 Final that I integrated to my offline image is KB2670838 & tested it on a live system. IE10 run perfect w/out any hitch. So, I guess IE10 Final included & install all the necessary prerequisite.
Hmmmm I just tried the x64 installer on my Virtualbox x64 machine and it showed that it installed, asked to reboot and after I restarted and opened IE it flashed "IE10 installer" and that was it... nothing else and I am still running IE9 The system is completely patched and has the following installed: McRip Windows 7 x64\Additional\KB982861.Internet.Explorer.9.0\IE9-win7.msu McRip Windows 7 x64\Additional\KB982861.Internet.Explorer.9.0\Updates\IE9-Windows6.1-KB2792100-x64.msu McRip Windows 7 x64\Additional\KB982861.Internet.Explorer.9.0\Updates\IE9-Windows6.1-KB2797052-x64.msu McRip Windows 7 x64\Additional\IE10ReleasePreview\Updates\Windows6.1-KB2786081-x64.msu McRip Windows 7 x64\Additional\IE10ReleasePreview\Prerequisites\Windows6.1-KB2726535-x64.msu McRip Windows 7 x64\Additional\IE10ReleasePreview\Prerequisites\Windows6.1-KB2729094-v2-x64.msu
McRip: In the Windows 7 main directory, I see the file "x64-2012.02.17.7z". Is it named wrong? Isn't it supposed to say "x64-2013.02.17.7z" since we are now in the year 2013 instead of 2012?
In a folder named IE10 for example, you put the .cab of IE10 and hotfix KB2670838 in M7W folder (my example) After a command prompt, you indicate command lines Folders x64 (installs folder of Windows 7), M7W, etc... are my examples, you can name as you like dism /mount-wim /wimfile:\M7W\x64\sources\install.wim /index:3 /mountdir:\M7W\Mount dism /image:\M7W\Mount /add-package /packagepath:\M7W\Windows6.1-KB2670838-x64.msu dism /image:\M7W\Mount /add-package /packagepath:\M7W\IE10 dism /unmount-wim /mountdir:\M7W\Mount /commit