Windows 7 Hotfix repository

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by SoLoR, May 22, 2010.

  1. komm

    komm MDL Addicted

    Jun 16, 2011
    894
    3,069
    30
    Buy the way,
    new KUC for Win7 is out.
    And leisure time is over.

    Sorry had no time to remove the IE issue.
    Had to check a lot of updates somebody posts in the forum,
    that should be superseded or missing, supposedly.


    And yes I checked all updates that KUC marked to add, and did not find a mistake on my side.
    Some updates could be superseded.
    But if one component of an update has no follower, I need at least one proof it's not needed.

    And yes it also takes a lot of time to do all this.

    2574819-v2 is not really clear.
    I do not have installed the GDR part and it does not come up in WU for me.
    maybe the windows-t..-always-installable means, it can be uninstalled if RDP-WinIP8 is installed.

    On the other hand, I had a lot of problems to remove 2574819-v1 form the DVD images and
    integrate 2574819-v2.
    Last I give up. My x64 DVDs now contain GDR version of 2574819-v1 and LDR version of 2574819-v2.
    After OS installation the GDR part can safely be removed.

    Or 2492386x64-component "windows-a..ence-mitigations-c2" has no follower.
    Was this a one time mistake of MS?

    So, what to do with all those unclear updates.
    Declare them as superseded, by decree.
    What, if this part of the update would have told you,
    that the app you want to use is not compatible with your x64 system.
    And you spend hours to find that out.

    Questions, Questions, Questions.

    For me the decision is easy.
    Keep it, if you do not know if it is needed.

    We have round about 700 non superseded Updates, and round about 1200 superseded ones.
    But we have only a hand full doubtful updates.

    That's (let me calculate: a hand = 5 so 5/700*100=5/7%) round about 1% we may have too much installed.


    Better lose a friend than a supposedly needed update.
    (O, I forgot I have no)
     
  2. PointZero

    PointZero MDL Member

    Oct 5, 2011
    1,415
    3,777
    60
    Just try to relax man- these are hotfixes you're talking about; not atomic bombs or kitten's lives..

    It's not the end of the world if somebody doesn't agree with you.
     
  3. CyberUser

    CyberUser MDL Junior Member

    May 15, 2012
    63
    42
    0
    I tend to concur with the idea of being open-minded to viable suggestions.

    For example,
    - suggested improvements to offline integration of IE10 (KUC) to no avail
    - suggested mirrors for McRip's servers ... [My region was off limit to McRip's servers for DDOS attacks ???]
    ["co-payment" of file hoster can be considered]

    Sigh :(
     
  4. PointZero

    PointZero MDL Member

    Oct 5, 2011
    1,415
    3,777
    60
    KUC can download all updates for you and they don't come from McRip's server- they're downloaded from a server that komm pays for. So he is offering an alternative download source to you, if McRip's server is not available.

    But KUC doesn't require you to use his server as a download source. If you've already downloaded updates from McRip's server or another source, just put the updates in KUC's \repo folder.


    I'm not sure what you suggested to him for improvements, but if he felt they were worthwhile ideas and he had available time, I'm sure he would consider implementing them.

    People don't realize how much time and effort komm has put into KUC. He has tracked every update/hotfix released for multiple versions of Windows (beyond just Win7, Win8 & Win8.1). Not only has he tracked every update, he's had to keep track of every component that is affected within these updates to ensure that the latest is used. And KUC has to deal with update conflicts/verify prerequisites are installed, etc. It really is an amazing feat that he's accomplished in KUC.

    komm normally has very little free time available for KUC. Recently, he's had a window of free time to work on KUC and post here at MDL, but that free time will be coming to an end soon and KUC updates will probably only be coming on a monthly basis.

    Instead of people moaning about what KUC doesn't do, they should be more appreciative of what KUC does. :hug2:
     
  5. compstuff

    compstuff MDL Senior Member

    Jan 16, 2011
    437
    312
    10
    I certainly do NOT want to get involved in any drama here but I do want to say that I have never seen a tool like KUC in all my years of being in IT... it is beyond my comprehension how Komm does what he does. With that said, despite any personalities, quirks, idiosyncrasies, etc I think this forum is hands down AMAZING and I am thankful to ALL for what they contribute and I am extremely thankful for what I have been able to obtain from here. I sincerely hope everyone will continue to contribute in the spirit in which this entire thread was founded and based. Thanks:cheers:
     
  6. parapher

    parapher MDL Senior Member

    Nov 6, 2012
    323
    248
    10
    Or, in other words, sometimes people could do with a hotfix :D And yes that means all of us!
     
  7. biatche

    biatche MDL Addicted

    Nov 14, 2009
    573
    144
    30


    Mind telling me the general difference between komm's updates and mcrip's? (I've been using McRip's all these while after Solor)
     
  8. PointZero

    PointZero MDL Member

    Oct 5, 2011
    1,415
    3,777
    60
    The goal of both repositories is the same- to contain the latest batch of non-superseded updates/hotfixes available, and they're both great sources. There is some variation in contents though since Win7 has such a massive number of updates now, and that was being discussed a few pages back. A restart of the analysis of variation would be beneficial (if it can be done dispassionately).
     
  9. RicaNeaga

    RicaNeaga MDL Senior Member

    Apr 25, 2011
    253
    452
    10
    With the fantastic help from abbodi1406, I have the full list (with new / superseded / relocated hotfixes) almost ready for McRip - I'll send it to him as soon as I have two thing clear:

    1. Is 2690750 really not superseded?

    2. 2798787 is superseded by which update (partially)?
     
  10. abbodi1406

    abbodi1406 MDL KB0000001

    Feb 19, 2011
    17,810
    94,906
    340
    1. Yes, it's superseded only if you install WMF

    2. 2866693
     
  11. RicaNeaga

    RicaNeaga MDL Senior Member

    Apr 25, 2011
    253
    452
    10
    But 2866693 only has Microsoft.grouppolicy.reporting.dll, right?

    What about Gppref.dll, Gpprefbr.dll, Gpprefcn.dll and Propshts.dll from 2798787? Are they not superseded by any other updates? btw, just verified, none of these dlls are present on my system, so it's very likely they're RSAT only as said on the previous pages...

    Thanks again :)
     
  12. RicaNeaga

    RicaNeaga MDL Senior Member

    Apr 25, 2011
    253
    452
    10
    2878378 and 2872862 were pulled by Microsoft :( Fortunately, those hotfixes weren't involved in the superseeded discussion.

    So I'm going to do an ultimate build (instead of my usual HP one) without 2798787, to see if it's fully superseded (HP doesn't have Group Policy, only Pro / Ultimate), and also to see if there is a variation in the needed WU Satisfy Updates.
     
  13. CyberUser

    CyberUser MDL Junior Member

    May 15, 2012
    63
    42
    0
    Hi Komm,
    Try [KUC W7 UpdateChecker-Beta-v.1.5.009.2765.zip]
    It reported the following 8 files are missing:
    1. Windows6.1-KB2853952-x64.msu
    2. Windows6.1-KB2574819-v2-x64.msu
    3. Windows6.1-KB2831154-v2-x64.msu
    4. Windows6.1-KB2871085-x64.msu
    5. Windows6.1-KB2868116-x64.msu
    6. Windows6.1-KB2801244-v2-x64.msu
    7. Windows6.1-KB2870699-x64.msu
    8. Windows6.1-KB2870705-x64.msu
    Any advice ?
    Thanks.
     
  14. adric

    adric MDL Expert

    Jul 30, 2009
    1,468
    1,686
    60
    Latest KUC v.1.5.009.2765 says ADD IE9-Windows6.1-KB2839111-x86.msu, but it doesn't get downloaded from Komm's Repo if it's missing on the local Repo. I had to request the hotfix from Microsoft.

    Al
     
  15. pegasus80

    pegasus80 MDL Senior Member

    Nov 23, 2009
    259
    538
    10
    Same thing w/ KB2839111-x64.msu. It's missing from Komm's Repo.
     
  16. RicaNeaga

    RicaNeaga MDL Senior Member

    Apr 25, 2011
    253
    452
    10
    Made also a comparison between McRip and komm's servers for x64. Some questions - again, for windows 7 x64 ONLY qustions:

    2645640 (x64) superseded by ???
    2757638 (x64) superseded by 2799406 and 2836405 ???
    2872339 (x64) superseded by ???

    2483564 (x64) not superseded?
     
  17. abbodi1406

    abbodi1406 MDL KB0000001

    Feb 19, 2011
    17,810
    94,906
    340
    2645640 (x64) superseded by 2775511-v2
    2757638 (x64) superseded by 2799406 and 2836405 - Yes
    2872339 (x64) superseded by 2875501

    2483564 (x64) not superseded - No
     
  18. RicaNeaga

    RicaNeaga MDL Senior Member

    Apr 25, 2011
    253
    452
    10
    Also, for x64, KUC doesn't download 2736782-v3 and 2835361, and also downloads 2603229 & 2533552 in the main folder for an offline image.