Windows 7 SP1 RTM 7601.17514.101119-1850 leaked

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by torko26, Jan 14, 2011.

  1. spaceman7

    spaceman7 MDL Member

    Jul 1, 2009
    115
    11
    10
  2. tcntad

    tcntad MDL Guru

    Oct 26, 2009
    4,634
    1,654
    150
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. liliactr

    liliactr MDL Addicted

    Sep 3, 2009
    649
    250
    30
    #1323 liliactr, Jan 24, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2011
    Probably these leaked iso's are not the final iso's There is lot's of evidence that they are not final. Can be checked with folder structure and registry. There are evidence of they are test build iso's. Maybe can be game of microsoft for to make wzor as untrusted source. Also should be thats why wzor wait so much before to release them but because of high demand they have to leak. Should be a dummy to expect that OPK and AIK will stay like that at final. In any way we should respect wzor to supply us these and for the people that wants to use them in production environment needs to be carefull. Here is sample registry that prove it is a test version. I can find more evidence. Theese keys should not be in final iso. The final iso's can be with same build number but microsoft will pretty and rebuild them to production.

    Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\CBSTEST]
    "CurrentState"=dword:00000001
    "AutoStart"=dword:00000000
    "CBSTestWDSLogFile"="D:\\BVTBin\\Tests\\installpackage\\cbstest\\x86\\CBSTestWDS.log"
    "CBSTestWTTLogFile"="D:\\BVTBin\\Tests\\installpackage\\cbstest\\x86\\CBSTest-20101120-134853-784.wtl"
     
  4. tcntad

    tcntad MDL Guru

    Oct 26, 2009
    4,634
    1,654
    150
    #1324 tcntad, Jan 24, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2011
    Thanks bro:)

    I have around 95% but speeds are 1-2 kB/s...
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  5. rEApEAt

    rEApEAt MDL Senior Member

    Jan 5, 2011
    356
    170
    10
    #1325 rEApEAt, Jan 24, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 20, 2017
    I have found this in the registry:

    Code:
    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\CBSTEST]
    "CurrentState"=dword:00000001
    "AutoStart"=dword:00000000
    "CBSTestWDSLogFile"="C:\\BVTBin\\Tests\\installpackage\\cbstest\\AMD64\\CBSTestWDS.log"
    "CBSTestWTTLogFile"="C:\\BVTBin\\Tests\\installpackage\\cbstest\\AMD64\\CBSTest-20101120-194801-957.wtl"
    Which are the folder structure evidences?
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  6. liliactr

    liliactr MDL Addicted

    Sep 3, 2009
    649
    250
    30
    #1326 liliactr, Jan 24, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2011
    basicly not all files are dated same date. 20.11.2010.

    Also when i try to load hives for registry editing. it crashes and says it recovered from old one. It works just file when i load all sp0 old ones.

    Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM_00\ControlSet001\Control\Session Manager\Environment]
    "windows_tracing_logfile"="D:\\BVTBin\\Tests\\installpackage\\csilogfile.log"
    "windows_tracing_flags"="3"

    Also license eula files are not complate to give all licensing conditions.

    oem0.inf, oem1.inf files under inf directory

    rdlsbuscbs.inf
    can not be such catalog referance
     
  7. thethingy

    thethingy MDL Senior Member

    Sep 7, 2010
    301
    41
    10
    #1327 thethingy, Jan 24, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2011
    These reg keys are log files from something, nothing to say they are from installing windows itself, please provide more evidence, it could be that the reg entry has simply tested a file and logged it.
     
  8. Chris123NT

    Chris123NT MDL Expert

    Oct 23, 2010
    1,070
    793
    60
    I notice the reference to the BVTBin folder. BVT's are what they call Build Verification Tests. So these are the ISO's that were compiled to run the BVT's internally. This however does not prove that this is not SP1 RTM. All this proves is that they're internal MS ISO's, which they are.
     
  9. ttmax

    ttmax MDL Member

    Oct 27, 2009
    168
    44
    10
    People have time to loose here, trying to find evidences that these ISO are fake or not RTM.

    If you consider these ISO to be final , install them. If you don't trust, just don't install and wait for MSoft final announcement.

    Thats' it.
     
  10. liliactr

    liliactr MDL Addicted

    Sep 3, 2009
    649
    250
    30
    I did not say they are not. I only said microsoft will pretty clean and change some stuff and theese iso's will not be what we will download from msdn probably. Here is just a forum and i say my opinions.
     
  11. rEApEAt

    rEApEAt MDL Senior Member

    Jan 5, 2011
    356
    170
    10
    It's not that simple.

    I'm willing to use this ISO to produce a localized version. I would loose much more time doing and redoing the work than to just checking a thread.

    I trust the ISO and it is already installed in my main machine. But to produce a public release requires much more care.

    That's it.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  12. ttmax

    ttmax MDL Member

    Oct 27, 2009
    168
    44
    10
    Don't worry about that, it's Microsoft role to produce "public releases" .... :)
     
  13. rEApEAt

    rEApEAt MDL Senior Member

    Jan 5, 2011
    356
    170
    10
    But certainly not the way I intend to do. :rolleyes:
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  14. Trinket

    Trinket MDL Senior Member

    Feb 20, 2010
    487
    169
    10
    Myeah... I think the core OS files and all that are probably the same as the official MS releases will be, but somehow I get the feeling that the hashes are not going to match with the currently available iso's. Call it a hunch :) It's one I don't mind being wrong about tho ;)
     
  15. tcntad

    tcntad MDL Guru

    Oct 26, 2009
    4,634
    1,654
    150
    #1335 tcntad, Jan 24, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2011
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  16. garf02

    garf02 MDL Member

    Sep 15, 2007
    189
    73
    10
    #1336 garf02, Jan 24, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 20, 2017
  17. phasewolf

    phasewolf MDL Novice

    Aug 26, 2009
    7
    0
    0
    I did a clean install of win 7 and installed sp1. Several day have have gone by and this morning I wake up and a water mark on the bottom right now says Test Mode Windows 7 Build 7601

    Anyone know what happened to make this happen? My computer is bios modded with Dell slic, and windows update had not installed anything.
     
  18. CRA2YHAVOK

    CRA2YHAVOK MDL Senior Member

    Oct 23, 2009
    458
    155
    10
    Don't truly know but if it is still present you can try this:

    Open a CMD window with Administrator rights and run this command:

    Bcdedit.exe -set TESTSIGNING OFF

    Restart the computer and the test mode should hopefully be gone.
     
  19. phasewolf

    phasewolf MDL Novice

    Aug 26, 2009
    7
    0
    0
    It's just odd that it took a few days to show up and all. I have not installed any updates or programs at all sense I was waiting to see if this was really the service pack or not.
     
  20. CRA2YHAVOK

    CRA2YHAVOK MDL Senior Member

    Oct 23, 2009
    458
    155
    10
    Could be to do with driver issues & compatibility with SP1?

    Like you said its strange it took a few days to show?

    I've never experienced it myself so haven't read up in-depth on why it's likely to show up.