Windows 7 SP1 RTM 7601.17514.101119-1850 leaked

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by torko26, Jan 14, 2011.

  1. rEApEAt

    rEApEAt MDL Senior Member

    Jan 5, 2011
    356
    170
    10
    I have decompressed the us-en and the pt-br language packs and some of the contents do not show 7601.17514, but 7600.16385. I guess it might be normal as long as just some files were updated. Examining the properties of the DLLs, you'll find the same mix (different release dates and versions). Anyway, the LPs are working with SP1. I have attached images with the x64 pack contents, but it's the same thing inside the x86 pack.

    This is more weird: when you open the x86 labguage pack (7601.17514.101119-1850_x86fre_client_langpacks_1-GRMCLP1_DVD.iso) in UltraIso, it says it's a UDF DVD, but shows an overloaded CD image. It does not happen with the x64 language pack.

    :confused:
     

    Attached Files:

    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  2. FukenGruven

    FukenGruven MDL Member

    Jan 9, 2011
    108
    22
    10
    #1382 FukenGruven, Jan 25, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2011
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. tuvi123

    tuvi123 MDL Addicted

    Jul 29, 2009
    623
    86
    30
    FukenGruven
    You are wrong.
    I have WZOR original 7600.16385 untouched iso:
    MICROSOFT.WINDOWS.7.ULTIMATE.7600.16385.RTM.X64.RE TAIL.ENGLISH.DVD-WZT
    File: 7600.16385.090713-1255_x64fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GRMCULXFRER_EN_DVD.iso
    CRC32: 1f1257ca
    MD5: f43d22e4fb07bf617d573acd8785c028
    SHA-1: 326327cc2ff9f05379f5058c41be6bc5e004baa7

    hash is the same as Technet/MSDN iso.
    so you probably downloaded a modifided iso.
     
  4. craftbrewer

    craftbrewer MDL Senior Member

    Jul 30, 2009
    274
    142
    10
    I agree, Mine is the same too
     
  5. morphine

    morphine MDL Novice

    Aug 6, 2007
    8
    0
    0
    Same here too.
     
  6. triggat

    triggat MDL Member

    Feb 18, 2009
    204
    13
    10
  7. Kouryu

    Kouryu MDL Senior Member

    Jan 19, 2011
    423
    132
    10
    Also try installing SP1 in safe mode w/networking... I was able to install it that way (normal mode didn't work).... it goes a lot faster too!
     
  8. yro

    yro MDL Addicted

    Jul 26, 2009
    645
    127
    30
    Does anybody knows the release date for SP1 RTM from Microsoft? (not the leaked SP1).

    I want to download from the official microsoft website but I dont have any idea of when it will be releaed for public.


    sorry about my english..
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  9. ricktendo64

    ricktendo64 MDL Expert

    Apr 20, 2008
    1,396
    2,025
    60
    Does anybody know a single topic that contains ALL the links to ALL the torrents so far?

    Like LangPacks, LocalPacks, OS ISO's, OPK/WAIK sup, etc...I ask because the first post is lacking
     
  10. calpo

    calpo MDL Member

    Apr 23, 2010
    212
    60
    10
    Ask Microsoft for the answer.

    Good luck.

     
  11. Kalliedog

    Kalliedog MDL Junior Member

    Jul 31, 2009
    63
    19
    0
    Go to wzor.net. All the links are there for everything (stand alones, iso's (retail, OEM, enterprise), all language packs, server, details of the signoff of SP1, WAIK, OEM pre installation kit. Remember....Ku! Ku!.
    I don't pass this info often so enjoy. Rep me if you like.
    Kalliedog.
     
  12. ricktendo64

    ricktendo64 MDL Expert

    Apr 20, 2008
    1,396
    2,025
    60
    #1394 ricktendo64, Jan 25, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 25, 2011
    If you dont have anything constructive to add the SHUT THE F*CK UP!

    **Admin note: Your post is as useful as the one you have quoted, that is to say useless.***

    Warning received!
     
  13. Enigma256

    Enigma256 MDL Senior Member

    Jan 17, 2011
    357
    309
    10
    #1395 Enigma256, Jan 25, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2011
    *laughs* That's assuming that Microsoft actually cares about these "leaks", which are almost certainly not coming from Microsoft itself, but from partners to which Microsoft has already released stuff.

    Consider...
    1) Microsoft is extremely conservative when it comes to validation. Any change, no matter how minor, would require revalidation. They don't want to be bothered with that.
    2) These "leaks" happened two months after the final build. Almost certainly came from a third-party partner and not from MSFT itself. In other words, they have already released the ISOs to their third-party partners (not to mention their internal testers even earlier). Now they are going to tell them, "oh, sorry, we're going to change stuff around; we hope you haven't gotten too attached to those bits we sent earlier"? Hell no.
    3) Think about what "changing a few bits" would mean. The automated build process probably churned out and auto-hashed hundreds of ISOs. Think about all the editions, all the different language-specific builds, OEM vs. Retail, etc. All those things were built, hashed or signed at the time of building, etc. To make a change, they have to go in, make the "minor change" to all of those ISOs, revalidate all of those ISOs (even if it's as basic as rehashing the ISO and then doing a check to make sure that between the hashes, no other changes inadvertently crept in from extraneous sources such as disk corruption), and redistribute them.

    And this isn't speculation. I work in software engineering, with automated builds that not only compile stuff, but also automatically package them for distribution, create hashes, etc. And I know that in situations like this, going in and making a "minor change" is a major PITA, even if it doesn't require a rebuild. And this is with things that are much simpler, smaller than Windows.

    The very idea of MSFT making a change to snub some petty "leakers" (whose importance in the minds of the people in this forum is grossly inflated, relative to their importance in the eyes of MSFT) at the cost of extra time, effort, and a massive amount of hassle on their end is simply preposterous and ridiculous.
     
  14. Enigma256

    Enigma256 MDL Senior Member

    Jan 17, 2011
    357
    309
    10
    I made a post way back in #1070 that contained all the torrents that I could find on wzor's site using a probing script that I wrote. There were 30 of them, IIRC.
     
  15. tomorrow

    tomorrow MDL Addicted

    Jul 3, 2008
    722
    263
    30
    Get yours facts straight!

    Learn how buildnumbers are compiled.The 101119-1850 part at the end is not meaningless mumbo-jumbo but the builddate and hour.If this would indeed have been one of the first ones we would have seen leaked buildnumbers for newer builds by now.We have not.Hence there is no newer and this is RTM.
     
  16. bjf2000

    bjf2000 MDL Expert

    Apr 11, 2008
    1,102
    200
    60
    At this point it's down to wild guesses. Here's mine: Tuesday morning Redmond time, about 12 hours from now. Why? Because MS uses the 4th Tuesday of most every month to put out miscellaneous non-security releases. When SP1 does come out, expect to see it first in the subscriber downloads on MSDN/Technet and then the public Technet site, but probably not on the same day. Then weeks later in WU.
     
  17. ibeqa

    ibeqa MDL Member

    Sep 14, 2009
    156
    7
    10
    You people are unbelieveble, how do you expect others to read more than 10 pages of nothing every day?
    Even admins have given up and are not monitoring this thread.
     
  18. thethingy

    thethingy MDL Senior Member

    Sep 7, 2010
    301
    41
    10
    What?, get your facts straight and stop assuming, you nor I have no idea really whether this build is the first made or the twentieth made, you or I have no clue what is really going on at all, the only difference between my belief's and yours is I respect others opinions you don't. the only thing that can be said for certain is that it is a build that is not beta, whos to know if another comes out?, given the fact that you get the option to uninstall the sp in the iso then its likely that another iso build will come out but there is no rule that it cant have the same build number as this release.