Windows 7 SP1 RTM 7601.17514.101119-1850 leaked

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by torko26, Jan 14, 2011.

  1. thethingy

    thethingy MDL Senior Member

    Sep 7, 2010
    301
    41
    10
    #1481 thethingy, Jan 27, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2011

    how do you know?, the ones in the "e" clearly state "rc" the others simply state "sp1"........................

    Edit, soz, the evaluation licences are indeed all "rc" the main & oem licences except the "e" are "sp1", how bizarre, wouldn't change the build number if this were fixed though.
     
  2. liliactr

    liliactr MDL Addicted

    Sep 3, 2009
    649
    250
    30
    #1482 liliactr, Jan 27, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2011
    Also i am %100 sure there is NO WAY this leaked integrated isos can be final RTM isos also NO WAY microsoft can give them to OEM partners to install large amount preinstalled systems. Maybe can give oem partners for to TEST ONLY but not for install. I trust myself :p Should be better then to trust 3rd party else someone. I checked all files and all registry. Driver database not match to installed drivers. Contains old drivers. But same time OPK winpe contains new drivers and can be final. I checked Enterprise x86 not Ultimate. Also nnm-club (which zukona use sometimes) did not relased same isos to tracker.
     
  3. torko26

    torko26 MDL Senior Member

    May 28, 2009
    497
    1,095
    10
    Just check MSDN in few weeks ! You will see same ISOs what leaked ;)
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  4. liliactr

    liliactr MDL Addicted

    Sep 3, 2009
    649
    250
    30
    #1484 liliactr, Jan 27, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2011
    Ok. We will see ;)

    Just mount winpe.wim from OPK. Mount install.wim from enterprise. Compare folder structure with Scooter Software Beyond Compare. Select list differences. You will see why it can not be final.

    OPK-winpe.wim
    Windows\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\battery.inf_x86_neutral_9bcedf7d768e9f5f
    battery.inf 20.11.2010

    enterprise-Install.wim
    Windows\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\battery.inf_x86_neutral_5752155055c5e2d7
    battery.inf 14.07.2009


    when battery.inf_x86_neutral_9bcedf7d768e9f5f(true)=battery.inf_x86_neutral_5752155055c5e2d7(false) ->rtm

    just only one example there are hundreds in there.
     
  5. mOBSCENE

    mOBSCENE MDL Junior Member

    Feb 9, 2010
    68
    39
    0
    Huh? This build is even older? 17125 vs leaked 17514 o_O
     
  6. UltimateGTR

    UltimateGTR MDL Member

    Jul 18, 2009
    101
    18
    10
    So this is the one that will publish officially?
     
  7. SoLoR

    SoLoR MDL Expert

    Jul 30, 2008
    1,371
    1,256
    60
    NO! lets stop posting random build numbers that do nothing else but confuse people... QFE = quick fix engeenering FAR FAR away from RTM or even GDR/LDR branch that you get hotfixes from.
     
  8. rath_iruzer

    rath_iruzer MDL Novice

    Aug 2, 2009
    47
    6
    0
    I have opiniion.
    If you don;t believe it is RTM, don't download it.
    We download it because:
    1. we believe it is RTM
    2. we want test it because curious.
    I know it is sounded idiot or stupid but please respect it.
     
  9. Stannieman

    Stannieman MDL Guru

    Sep 4, 2009
    2,228
    1,817
    90
    The rc in the license files for e and n are not a problem. The same rc eulas are in the 7600RTM build, so it's normal.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  10. Belarathon

    Belarathon MDL Senior Member

    Nov 21, 2007
    316
    37
    10
    No, that doesn't sound idiotic. I was curious myself. If it's not RTM, it's not the end of the world, from a hobbyist's prospective.
     
  11. mOBSCENE

    mOBSCENE MDL Junior Member

    Feb 9, 2010
    68
    39
    0
    #1491 mOBSCENE, Jan 27, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2011
    Yeah, I've noticed this too. But... in the language pack I just integrated (SP1 Dutch, also from WZor), the standard Enterprise (not just E or N) license also shows "Release Candidate" in the WAIK !

    Inside: waik_supplement_en-us.iso\X86\WINPE_FPS\NL-NL\WINPE-SETUP-CLIENT_NL-NL.CAB
    And then: WINPE-SETUP-CLIENT_NL-NL.CAB\x86_microsoft-windows-i..nterprise.resources_31bf3856ad364e35_6.1.7601.17514_nl-nl_a38fcf90ed8b9438\license.rtf

    The 7600 MSDN build does not show this. Probably MS just screwed it up with SP1 ? ;) Or might be that the MSDN SP1 ISOs will have corrected version.
     
  12. Acker

    Acker MDL Novice

    Jul 24, 2010
    20
    0
    0
    Also, this RTM (whether is the real or not) it's waaaaaaaaaay better than the SP0+Slipstreamed Hotfixes. I'm not f¨king downloading another 3GB just because some files are not the latest build numbers. Nothing that a upcoming Hotfixes couldn't fix :).
     
  13. xaudiox

    xaudiox MDL Novice

    Jul 30, 2009
    38
    7
    0
    Has anyone tried to Uninstall this so called SP1 RTM ?
    I get a message stating "not all updates have been uninstalled" and the service pack is still in add/remove programs list.
    I guess I am stuck with this piece of crap now :mad: unless i roll to my last backup 4 weeks ago.
     
  14. Computer Fixer

    Computer Fixer MDL Member

    Jan 5, 2010
    165
    30
    10
    You didn't do a full backup before installing a (leaked release) Service Pack??
    Kind of makes sense that there would be some un-installable updates, because some normal everyday updates state they can't be uninstalled- so if the SP is the roll-up of all/most updates and hotfixes it seems likely that there would be some un-installable updates in there too.
     
  15. torko26

    torko26 MDL Senior Member

    May 28, 2009
    497
    1,095
    10
    Format C: and install :D
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  16. bjf2000

    bjf2000 MDL Expert

    Apr 11, 2008
    1,102
    200
    60
    No, it makes no sense. Service Packs can be uninstalled fully. I hope it was an isolated issue.
     
  17. Belarathon

    Belarathon MDL Senior Member

    Nov 21, 2007
    316
    37
    10
    My pat response to comrades who want to know what to do with their bug ridden computers.:biggrin:
     
  18. xaudiox

    xaudiox MDL Novice

    Jul 30, 2009
    38
    7
    0
    #1498 xaudiox, Jan 27, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2011
    Yes of course they can, this kind of proves that this is not at all RTM.
    Reason for uninstall = My computer was noticeably slower after the install.
    I am also fully aware of the consequences of installing a leaked version also, rolled back to my backup now so no harm done !
     
  19. hclarkjr

    hclarkjr MDL Member

    Nov 18, 2007
    148
    44
    10
    i did just that and am having 0 problems, computer is as fast as before.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  20. bjf2000

    bjf2000 MDL Expert

    Apr 11, 2008
    1,102
    200
    60
    I wouldn't go as far as making that conclusion, since even Beta 1 could be uninstalled normally. I think you just ran into some unidentified, random issue, both with the install (slow afterwards) and the uninstall.