Guys, would you tell me please, can I integrate licked hot-fixes ( KB2894179, KB2883200, and KB2894029 ) in Windows 8.1 DVD using Windows Download Integrator v.3.5 ?
Quick example of how to integrate patches with DISM. Code: * Build a Windows 8.1 USB (it is easier this way) (8gb minimum size...) * Open "Assessment and Imaging Tools Environment" as Administrator * Mount the install.wim (example command: ) Dism /Mount-Wim /WimFile:"install.wim" /index:1 /MountDir:"c:\mount\mountedimage" * Add the patches... Dism /Add-Package /Image:"c:\mount\mountedimage" /PackagePath:"patch.msu" Verify: Dism /Get-Packages /Image:"c:\mount\mountedimage" * Finalize: (Do this when you have integrated all the stuff you like) Dism /Unmount-WIM /MountDir:"c:\mount\mountedimage" /Commit Done!
I think you can use the Download Integrator tool... And just integrate the patches via integrate patches section. Correct me if i am wrong...
I only see integrate service packs. Anyone able to give me a blow by blow of how to add these with Download Integrator? Thanks.
Thanks Alpha for that program I now have the latest integrated. I have a question. People post that certain order if you were doing them 3 updates manually. How would Windows know what order since I integrated them 3 into my install .iso? Thanks.
I installed them in numerical order KB2883200, KB2894029, KB2894179 as I had not seen ColdZero's post they all installed correctly
The Rollup for OCt contains a readme: Code: Windows 8.1, Windows RT 8.1 & Windows Server 2012 – Oct 2013 – README Recommended Install Order 1. KB2894179 2. KB2883200 3. KB2894029 If you use dism with "/Add-Package /PackagePath" it will install them in numerical order. I can't see any difference in either method...
I have 1 more observation. Can someone explain this. My iso from Win 8.1 that was released last month to OEM,the size is 3.62(3,897,927,680)and size on disk is(3,897,929,728). My new 8.1 iso that I slipstreamed them 3 updates is now 3.62GB(3,897,733,120),the size on disk is (3,897,733,120). Them updates were over 200MB...Shouldn't the iso be much larger than origninal? Thanks.