trying to activate but couldn't get it to work. when i enter the key with the slmgr -ipk command it gives me error: Error:0xC004F069 On a computer running Microsoft Windows non-core edition run 'slui.exe' 0x2a 0xC004f069 to display the error text. have no idea whats wrong...can you guide me please? searched the thread, saw few people got this but couldn't understand how they fixed it if any. please help. me want W8
This was the one that worked for me! (The one currently on page one gave me error 0xC004F074.) Thank you very much, superstar...you've lived up to your moniker in my eyes. P34c3
The kms host mentioned on page 1 (win8kms4........) is the same as 147.134........ and same as kms.creighton........; caused by that all are working .
There's no doubt with that and you're 100% correct. But: still more than 50% of the software developer developing 32bit software and those will run better on 32bit OS's! Also the still available "old" 32 bit apps will working better on 32bit OS. If 64bit is adopted by the majority of Software there's is a good chance that the future OS's will be 64bit only. Till today, the downward compatibility in MS Software works outstanding compare with OS-X as example. That downward compatibility will be mainly gone if the OS will be 64bit only.
Just to enlighten those who seem to be arguing issues of U.S. Copyright Law, without having any real knowledge of the subject, in the U.S., at least, it is quite possible to have "copyrighted" materials available to the public. Books and movies fall into that category, as does computer software, including "keys" that may be freely accessed "by the public." Under U.S. law: "Public release, disclosure and dissemination describe the availability of a work. Publicly released, disclosed or disseminated information may be owned and protected by copyright, and therefore, not be in the public domain. Does the Copyright Law apply to materials on the Internet or the Web? "Yes, the Internet is another form of publishing or disseminating information; therefore, copyright applies to Web sites, e-mail messages, Web-based music, etc. Simply because the Internet provides easy access to the information does not mean that the information is in the public domain or is available without limitations. Copyrighted works found on the Internet should be treated the same as copyrighted works found in other media. One should not confuse the "availability" of the information to answer the question of whether it can be, or is copyrighted and therefore subject to certain restrictions which may be enforced by the full weight of the judicial system. If it is copyrighted, and most of what Microsoft produces is copyrighted, then the full weight of the legal system is available for their use in protecting their copyrighted materials. They also have a sufficient number of legal staff on payroll and on retainer to enforce whenever they feel it is to their interest to do so. Remember, they don't have to hunt YOU down. They have the "easier" target of our Forum to focus on and the power of a "takedown notice" to assist them in such efforts and to entitle them to damages and attorney's fees in a successful case. That doesn't mean they WILL sue, but it loads the dice in THEIR favor, should they decide to do so. Regards,
Those Copyright Law is almost identical in all countries around the world. Publishing copyrighted data on the Internet didn't means that those data could be freely used in any means by everybody. Also it didn't means that those public available made data could be used without to pay the "royalty fees" to the owner of that copyright. There's one exception were it's allowed to use partly copyrighted digital data for to re-publish and that is named: Fair Use...! This exception allows to republish mainly articles, photos, Diagrams etc. in NOT the full content as the original and limited to max. 3 Paragraphs while the Photos, Diagrams etc. must be within those 3 paragraphs. Multiple Display of those limited content on the same website is an clear breach of the copyright law.
According to Copyright Law everything is property of whom who make that product, what ever it is include digital content, in any meaning visible to public. That also includes the key's you like to have outsite of the law! The only exception is, if the owner of stated that some specific (which must be named) content is property of some others. In that regard, those copyright to that limited content is property of that other person, org etc.! Take a example a picture: if MS display's a picture and didn't add an copyright note to the picture, it would be shown as a 100% copyright of MS. Now someone claims that those picture isn't from MS, is from him instead and he has the proof, that would cost MS a lot of Bucks! Now the Product Key's! Those product Keys are used not for Activation only, they're also one part of the proof of Identity and bound to to the software in question. And to produce that key's, even if that is used with an automated system, it's also considered as work!