That is not the point. Windows Blue has to come in 3 flavors (Windows Red), that is the point and I agree.
BUT MS will not agree with this Point, SO what's the Point in TALKING about some thing that will never happen.
Stubborn didn't Build ALL MS Windows, Smart DID. IT you are smart, you would build windows 8 the way you like it, (Maybe install windows 7).
"That's why InfoWorld has designed the next edition of Windows for Microsoft. We call it Windows Red..." Yeah... is not happening. Ever. At all. People just dont get it, the traditional desktop pc is dying, like it or not, and yet they want MS to stay stuck in a dying market, just like Kodak did. Be glad the desktop is still there in windows 8 and be glad that is still possible to not use the "modern" interface at all, because that is going to change too. The days of the "software giant" are gone forever, and this is the only chance that MS has to survive. But well... nowadays everybody is an expert and the start menu is the core of an OS, at least inside the head of some ppl.
Maybe there where other people working at M$ in the past, smart people. By the way, I never said that I was smart, if that was the case I had more money and hire people to make an O.S. the way I wanted.
And they pull the strings, that is what I meant. Windows Red is one solution to the problem worldwide discussed. Windows 8.1 is not.
maybe you guys should start accepting the changes or should go for another os like linux or win 7. I think that would be a better solution.