10240 to 10586 x64 "update" is 2.55 GB?!?

Discussion in 'Windows 10' started by pf100, Jan 20, 2016.

  1. pf100

    pf100 Duct Tape Coder

    Oct 22, 2010
    2,069
    3,449
    90
    I just got a new awesome gaming computer! Yay! BUT, why, oh why, is the update from 10240 to 10586 x64 2.55 GB? My internet is slow and I just don't get it. If I'd known that I'd have installed 10586 to begin with. I mean, it's not an update, it's a complete upgrade. It's going to take 8 hours to download that. I'm mad and want to rant. Are they going to do it like this from now on, completely replacing the damn OS every so often with a freakin' multi-gigabyte "update"? Did I mention I'm mad about it? This is me cursing with every curse word I can think of. Twice. And after the upgrade I'm absolutely sure I'll have to delete the "$Windows.~BT" and whatever else folder the damn upgrade makes. I'm glad I know a lot about computers. The average Joe doesn't stand a chance with all this B.S.
    Yesterday I installed windows 7 ultimate on an old hard drive, got the genuineticket.xml with gatherosstate.exe, replaced that drive with my main one, clean installed windows 10240 offline, put the genuineticket.xml in the correct folder, rebooted, got online, and it activated immediately. Then I started updates last night with my windows update full control script with wumt and here I am on day 2, still not done yet.
    The bright side is, when all this is over and everything is working, I'm going to play elaborate computer games where you blow up stuff and kill people to relieve my pent up anger. AAARGHH!!!!!!!
     
  2. Tito

    Tito Super Mod / Adviser
    Staff Member

    Nov 30, 2009
    18,681
    18,589
    340
    It started from 8 -> 8.1, nothing new. BTW, at this time it would be better to directly start with 10586.
     
  3. pf100

    pf100 Duct Tape Coder

    Oct 22, 2010
    2,069
    3,449
    90
    #3 pf100, Jan 20, 2016
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2016
    (OP)
    Yes, I see that. If only I knew then what I know now...

    Edit: Also, by starting with 10240 and then updating, it's taking longer to install Windows 10 than it took for me to build my gaming p.c. from a pile of parts. I'm not kidding.
     
  4. CODYQX4

    CODYQX4 MDL Developer

    Sep 4, 2009
    4,813
    45,775
    150
    #4 CODYQX4, Jan 20, 2016
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2019
    .
     
  5. pf100

    pf100 Duct Tape Coder

    Oct 22, 2010
    2,069
    3,449
    90
    I haven't had any problems using WUMT to do updates, but if I ever do I'll definitely use the newest iso to upgrade or install instead.
     
  6. shawnmos

    shawnmos MDL Member

    Oct 27, 2007
    177
    6
    10
    Well it's basically like a service pack. Those were huge too.
     
  7. Myrrh

    Myrrh MDL Expert

    Nov 26, 2008
    1,511
    627
    60
    Actually it's basically like, in fact it exactly is, an upgrade from a previous version to a new version. As surely as if you inserted the new version's DVD and ran setup. The entire operating system gets replaced.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  8. LiteOS

    LiteOS Windowizer

    Mar 7, 2014
    2,209
    982
    90
    its not "update" for say
    its installing new os with all config reapplied and files copied

    thats why its so big
     
  9. pf100

    pf100 Duct Tape Coder

    Oct 22, 2010
    2,069
    3,449
    90
    This ^^^^^^^
     
  10. bpwnes

    bpwnes MDL Member

    Aug 11, 2015
    151
    27
    10
    This. The huge download is a new .wim or .esd (whichever they're using right now, so esd I suppose) which is then used to upgrade install the OS. The days of service packs are gone.

    Btw, if 10 gets messed up to the point where you have to Reset/Refresh it, you can do an in place upgrade using the Media Creation Tool and it won't uninstall all your programs.
     
  11. bromanbro

    bromanbro MDL Member

    Sep 30, 2012
    237
    39
    10
    If you're running Pro, check 'defer upgrades' to delay these larger release upgrades.
     
  12. pf100

    pf100 Duct Tape Coder

    Oct 22, 2010
    2,069
    3,449
    90
    I'm running pro. But then won't they at some point force a major upgrade anyway? I mean, am I not by deferring upgrades just making myself 3 or 6 months behind until these same forced upgrades happen anyway?
     
  13. pf100

    pf100 Duct Tape Coder

    Oct 22, 2010
    2,069
    3,449
    90
    #13 pf100, Jan 21, 2016
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2016
    (OP)
    The "update" failed so I converted the ESD file downloaded during the update to iso and am going to wipe out this install and clean install 10586. It was just after a clean install of 10240 anyway. Nothing to lose. I'm done. This is bulls**t.

    Update: I made a bootable flash drive with the iso and everything's going okay now.
     
  14. bromanbro

    bromanbro MDL Member

    Sep 30, 2012
    237
    39
    10
    Yes, but you'll still be upgrading less often. Plus, more stability since the builds will have been patched for several months already.
     
  15. rpo

    rpo MDL Expert

    Jan 3, 2010
    1,447
    1,424
    60
    I guess that upgrading to the next release (red stone) will be the same uggly process.
     
  16. Myrrh

    Myrrh MDL Expert

    Nov 26, 2008
    1,511
    627
    60
    Best practice IMO, if you have slow internet:

    Go somewhere the internet is faster, obtain the latest ISO (or the correct esd so you can generate your own). Transport that on usb media back to the machine(s) with slow internet connection. Mount the ISO and run setup.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  17. shawnmos

    shawnmos MDL Member

    Oct 27, 2007
    177
    6
    10
    Well this is true, but I remember service packs taking just as long to install so to the end user, not much difference.