Why dont you use Wim Integeration method as told by OP step by step in its readme txt file from ESU Bypass Script Tool .
yes i read it after that i commented . you are asking if theres any way to integerate that lite kb version number via ntlite & i suggested you why dont you go with wim integeration method as told very very clearly by OP of this thread . have i given any irrelevant answer or does my answer not belong to your query . anyways its my mistake that i commented.
Yes, let me try it again: I was asking if anyone managed to find a way to integrate it with NLite. I didnt need anyone pointing me towards the OP I read every week or so
KB4528069-Lite is not supported anymore, it doesn't work with the latest ESU updates, use any of the still supported Bypasses (v5, v6 and v7), they have their own method of offline integration.
That's odd, because I've only used Lite and I've installed all latest updates. Unless you mean there were new updates since bi-monthly May 11 ones.
Clearly you are not a MACRIUM user who understands its complete operation... and clearly I am not a liar. This will be my last statement on the matter. If an attempt is made to take an INCREMENTAL image of a System that does not have a previous FULL, DIFFERENTIAL or INCREMENTAL reference image in place... a FULL image is created by Macrium REFLECT when an INCREMENTAL image is requested. This must be done to obtain the initial reference image needed for later DIFFERENTIAL or INCREMENTAL images. If an INCREMENTAL image is requested under these conditions (no previous reference), a FULL image is created. Possibly the problem here is really terminology... after all, an INCREMENTAL image of nothing (no reference for the incremental differences), indeed will be everything that's different... which is everything, a FULL image. Maybe it's terminology that's creating our misunderstandings, but it definitely isn't telling lies
I agree with you totally now MR GUI will make full backup but will show incremental backup even first backup or incremnt base. but i was making an end user understand in very simple way according to GUI base of MR . tell me if i am wrong that time as according to the scenario . There are three options shown there : first one is forensic sector by sector second incremental third differential. see if it shows something else at your side might be paramount software solutions have created a separate installer only for you .
I might suggest to the moderators of this Forum that calling a Forum member a LIAR is probably not good behavior for a Forum member... at least I don't think it is. I'm sure I don't know all the rules here, but that kind of insinuation probabnly should not exist in this Forum.
Brother i am sorry for this cuz everything happened because of me on this forum thread of yours . nothing else to say .
I am sorry if anything hurts you in personal because of me . nothing else left to say . is it ok for you . But in terms report you are free to report even i requested admins to delete my account on mdl .
Not really sure what to suggest @peacok see u edited ur post, i was about to post that...to try anyway Code: dism /online /remove-package /packagename:Package_for_KB4537829~31bf3856ad364e35~x86~~6.1.1.2 bummer...and what about sfc /scannow? Also nothing?
I tried to update to with KB4555449 after that, so nothing, sfc just said there where but were corrupt files but couldn't fix all of it. I just need something to delete KB4537829 at this point, i least know what is causing it. also thank you for telling me about kb947821, i didn't even knew about that.
have you tried removing KB4537829 by using wusa cmd (in elevated command prompt)? open cmd window with administrator privileges and insert this: wusa /uninstall /kb:4537829 /quiet /norestart