[DISCUSSION] UUP dump - download Windows 10/11 UUPs with ease

Discussion in 'MDL Projects and Applications' started by whatever127, Sep 2, 2017.

  1. Sjjd

    Sjjd MDL Novice

    Oct 11, 2020
    7
    0
    0
    my laptop specs is intel UHD graphic 620 and mx150 4gb with intel i5-8250u
    1.so I go to uupdump.ml and use this section (Latest Public Release build) and select arm64 then Feature update to Windows 10, version 20H2 (19042.572) download it and install it.
    is this the best version for my intel cpu? 2.or just go to uupdump.ml and use this section (Latest Public Release build) and select x64 then Feature update to Windows 10 version 2004 (19041.572)?
    which one is best capatible for my laptop? 1 or 2
    sorry for asking a lot Qs
     
  2. Sjjd

    Sjjd MDL Novice

    Oct 11, 2020
    7
    0
    0
    someone help :(:(:(
    for intel i5-8250 which on is best? x64 or arm64
     
  3. Windows arm64 wouldn't even run on your processor, so x64.
     
  4. ianymaty

    ianymaty MDL Member

    Jan 31, 2010
    136
    97
    10
    Hi,
    Updated Romanian language with Generalize ro-ro translation for FAQ entry and minor tweaks in some other areas.
     

    Attached Files:

  5. awuctl

    awuctl MDL Member

    Jun 6, 2020
    118
    436
    10
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  6. Windows 10 User

    Windows 10 User MDL Guru

    Feb 2, 2017
    2,005
    122
    90
    Is someone else having the following message after running uup_download_windows.cmd?

    Code:
    Unable to retrieve data from Windows Update servers. Reason: EMPTY_FILELIST
    If this problem persists, most likely the set you are attempting to download was removed from Windows Update servers.
     
  7. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,656
    103,420
    450
    Yes, everybody who tries to download builds that are no longer present on MSFT servers.

    Many early 18362 and 19041 builds are removed, download the most current "cumulative update" build and set addupdates =0 in the convertconfig.ini to get a clean .1 ISO.
     
  8. Windows 10 User

    Windows 10 User MDL Guru

    Feb 2, 2017
    2,005
    122
    90
    Thanks. I guess I should download the 19041 most recent CU build and not the 19042 one to have a clean .1 Build. Also, I only want to have the Enterprise edition and I'm getting it along with the Pro one.
     
  9. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,656
    103,420
    450
    Doesn't matter, 19042.6xx without updates integrated will still be 19041.1.

    Set delete source =1 in the same ini file and you will get an Enterprise only ISO.

    Code:
    [convert-UUP]
    AutoStart    =1
    AddUpdates   =0
    Cleanup      =0
    ResetBase    =0
    NetFx3       =0
    StartVirtual =1
    wim2esd      =0
    SkipISO      =0
    SkipWinRE    =0
    ForceDism    =0
    RefESD       =0
    
    [create_virtual_editions]
    vAutoStart   =1
    vDeleteSource=1
    vPreserve    =0
    vwim2esd     =0
    vSkipISO     =0
    vAutoEditions=Enterprise
     
  10. Windows 10 User

    Windows 10 User MDL Guru

    Feb 2, 2017
    2,005
    122
    90
    #3490 Windows 10 User, Dec 1, 2020
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2020
    Thanks. Does it matter downloading the Cumulative Update build or the Feature Update one when wanting the .1 build? Maybe I should download the former since according to the FAQ it only has base updates (I don't know what does that mean) while the other has base updates and additional updates (I don't know what the latter mean, too) even though in the end it may be indifferent since I'd only have the .1 build.
     
  11. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,656
    103,420
    450
    Feature update option has a du for sources that will be used whether addupdates is set to 1 or 0.
     
  12. Windows 10 User

    Windows 10 User MDL Guru

    Feb 2, 2017
    2,005
    122
    90
    Is that the only difference between them?
     
  13. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,656
    103,420
    450
    In the context of your question about getting a clean 19041.1 ISO, yes.
     
  14. Windows 10 User

    Windows 10 User MDL Guru

    Feb 2, 2017
    2,005
    122
    90
    #3494 Windows 10 User, Dec 1, 2020
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2020
    Do you think I should change to the RP channel since the Beta one doesn't offer .NET Framework updates (I don't know why)? I guess one is offered updates earlier when on the Beta channel than on the RP one but I don't know if the difference is big.
     
  15. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,656
    103,420
    450
    Never checked that but with 1903/9 they were offered in whatever ring you enrolled.

    Maybe better to stay in the retail ring and install IP updates manually when they come available and you can decide whether to use them or not.

    You can also use this to easily switch between rings/channels or sign out entirely:
    OfflineInsiderEnroll
     
  16. Windows 10 User

    Windows 10 User MDL Guru

    Feb 2, 2017
    2,005
    122
    90
    That's what I used to enroll on the Beta channel. What do you mean by "IP updates"? What if I keep enrolled on the Beta channel and search this forum to install .NET Framework updates?
     
  17. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,656
    103,420
    450
    That's another way to do it.
     
  18. Windows 10 User

    Windows 10 User MDL Guru

    Feb 2, 2017
    2,005
    122
    90
    But I guess if I was enrolled on the RP channel I'd get .NET Framework updates as well as the other updates, albeit maybe a little latter than Beta channel users.
     
  19. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,656
    103,420
    450
    I will setup an install and enroll in the channels to see what is offered on what asap.
     
  20. Windows 10 User

    Windows 10 User MDL Guru

    Feb 2, 2017
    2,005
    122
    90
    #3500 Windows 10 User, Dec 1, 2020
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2020
    What is the difference between checking the "Create ISO with install.esd instead of install.wim" setting on UUP Dump and changing the ConvertConfig's wim2esd's entry from "0" to "1"? Also, I guess if I check UUP Dump's "Integrate .NET Framework 3.5 (Windows converter only)" it wouldn't be an untouched image as well as after checking the "Run cleanup after updates integration (Windows converter only)". What does the latter and what problems may I have after checking this setting?