Maybe because .NET is FULLY installed? The CU installed fine on my laptop and these are my .NET installation settings... Just throwing a line out and hoping for a bite here.
Question brothers - Only Enterprise LTSC edition is whithout microsoft bloatware? I mean also no store no edge only "naked" version. First I thought usual Enterprise is also without all these apps, but when I tested, I see all of these. I always do after install this: Get-AppxPackage | Remove-AppxPackage, and it always works great but you know if some editions are without bloatware by default so why not. Thanks for any info.
Yes,only ltsb/ltsc versions come with no apps/edge & no store.Downside is that they will only receive security updates & no feature updates.e.g.ltsb2016 will never get a dark theme explorer & ltsc2019 will never get sandbox feature.
After the 18362.175 update from yesterday, I am having issues with Event Viewer. Specifically issues with Custom Views portion of Event Viewer. Seems to be MMA snap-in related error messages. Can anyone else confirm this?
Not sure if this has been reported, but the SVF.ISO Converter tool (0.51) seems to be broken at the moment due to bad URLs for the source files and .svf files? Is there a later version available here? I did a search but couldn't find the thread for it. I found the tool on another site with 0.51 being the latest available up to the end of April I think. Thanks.
The tool has no svf repository to download the needed svf files from, thereby the tool is suspended till we found a new solution. https://forums.mydigitallife.net/th...erter-v0-51-01-1903-ltsc2019-techbench.77028/
since he is upgrading from RS5 , it would be better if he posts there so RS5 guys can guide him better.
@Enthousiast Ah, thanks for the explanation. Is there also a reason why the Tech Bench downloads site doesn't keep business .iso versions rather than just consumer versions?
Techbench only provides Insider Preview VL iso's, all others are consumer only. The downloads are from the consumer iso download portals.
Nope.avi. Better to be posted here. Especially considering that despite your slightly condescending and extremely unhelpful reply to his post; he figured out his problem and was nice enough to share what he had to do to resolve it.
@Enthousiast Why 'not usable'? I got what I wanted to obtain with a bit of file renaming, Smart Version 3.7, and that repository, which your tool could have done via a script? No?