1. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,668
    103,484
    450
    SKU as in what did you install and what was installed when the HWID was established, Home, Pro, etcetc...
     
  2. eemuler

    eemuler MDL Senior Member

    Jul 31, 2015
    477
    182
    10
    Windows 10 pro en-gb was installed earlier. I chose the same while installing. That's the one I always use.
     
  3. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,668
    103,484
    450
    Reboot or run:
    Code:
    slmgr -ato
     
  4. eemuler

    eemuler MDL Senior Member

    Jul 31, 2015
    477
    182
    10
    Error: 0x803F7001 On a computer running Microsoft Windows non-core edition, run slui.exe 0x2a 0x803F7001 to display the error text.
     
  5. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,668
    103,484
    450
    That sounds like something went really wrong with your attempts to get it activated.

    When i search for "0x803F7001" in only find reports related to no hwid being present, what does running MAS 1.4 result in?
     
  6. eemuler

    eemuler MDL Senior Member

    Jul 31, 2015
    477
    182
    10
    MAS 1.4 check activation status says 0xC004F034 I looked it up:
    The mentioned error code usually means that the user entered the wrong license key. However, Microsoft admitted that the problem is more often at Microsoft’s server’s end, which may get too overloaded after the release of updates and other Microsoft support products.
    Therefore, if you cannot activate Windows due to the 0xC004F034 error, we would recommend postponing the activation for at least a couple of hours or the whole day.
     
  7. abbodi1406

    abbodi1406 MDL KB0000001

    Feb 19, 2011
    17,206
    90,780
    340
    So @Enthousiast was right afterall :D
    the new 21H2 EP KB5003791 is now versioned 19041.1237 (up from 19041.1019)

    that's actually the only difference, package content is not changed
     
  8. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,668
    103,484
    450
    I was just typing that:D
     
  9. OldMX

    OldMX MDL Addicted

    Jul 30, 2009
    540
    232
    30
    Maybe you installed a different version, like factory was Home and installed Pro?
     
  10. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,668
    103,484
    450
  11. eemuler

    eemuler MDL Senior Member

    Jul 31, 2015
    477
    182
    10
    I've always used Pro - haven't used Home since 2009 (Vista).
     
  12. eemuler

    eemuler MDL Senior Member

    Jul 31, 2015
    477
    182
    10
    Seems my activation is gone for good. Should I go for that MAS thing?
     
  13. Carlos Detweiller

    Carlos Detweiller Emperor of Ice-Cream

    Dec 21, 2012
    6,768
    7,710
    210
    Yep, if you want HwID or KMS38.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  14. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,668
    103,484
    450
    I assumed you ran it when suggested.
     
  15. eemuler

    eemuler MDL Senior Member

    Jul 31, 2015
    477
    182
    10
    At that time I had only used the option to check activation status. On a system with non-genuine Windows I'd have just run the activation without bothering you, but this laptop had genuine Windows and I wanted to see if recovery was possible from whatever error that caused it to lose activation. I still don't know for sure what happened. Anyway, now MAS did the job.

    Thank you so much for jumping in and helping out with suggestions and tools to try. I really appreciate it. :worthy:
     
  16. donmiller

    donmiller MDL Addicted

    Jun 4, 2016
    800
    490
    30
    Actually, by default, the DISM 10.0.19041.1019 Package Identity doesn't exist. By default, DISM does not use the mum2:customInformation substring to create a Package Identity for the EP. Instead, DISM uses the assemblyIdentity substrings.

    To get the Package Identity list for Windows 10, open a command prompt window and run:
    DISM /Online /Get-Packages /Format:Table

    This is the relevant MUM entry for the 06/29/21 EP:
    <assemblyIdentity name="Package_for_KB5003791" version="10.0.1.2" language="neutral" processorArchitecture="amd64" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" />

    DISM parses the MUM entry and creates the following Package Identity:
    Package_for_KB5003791~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.1.2 <---Valid

    The following is not a DISM default Package Identity
    10.0.19041.1019 <---Not Valid

    The Package Identity for the new 09/24/21 EP is:
    Package_for_KB5003791~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~19041.1237.1.3 <---Valid
    10.0.19041.1237 <---Not Valid for this package