That was the expectation since the switch from dev to beta channel and updates kept coming. 22000.132 Techbench IP ISOs are available, yep.
That has always been so, considering some brazillian member has been posting this for years (@Windows 10 User iirc)
Enthousiast if you think that every build of dev will be posted since 22454 is a single thread think twice before you speak, beta vs dev that's what it is..... It's dev or beta the way it is.
I have no clue what you are trying to tell me, i am trying to keep the forum structured and it seems i am loosing that fight every day a little bit more. And yes every released major new build gets posted in a dedicated thread: Win 10 list: [Index] Windows 10 Builds Win 11 list: [Index] Windows 11 Builds
Real life commerce still exists. MS still sells things in physical form to people without internet. If they sell a broken OS that requires massive patching to people who don't have internet, they're going to have massive lawsuits on their hands.
In this compilation there are some free applications from the store that your Microsoft account asks you to install them
Agree, BUT for for non internet people, 22000.9 simply works. Not perfectly, but does the job. M$ main market now is Internet people wanting to play games, use apps, and buy stuff. And any bets they will state in their terms and conditions you need to connect to the internet to get the latest fixes anyway, to tell non internet buyers they have to do this every now and then.
1-3 And get support centers flooded by calls from people, who can not even install 3rd party app or complaining that all webpages are broken. 2-4 Have you ever bothered to open Privacy in Settings?
YET AGAIN, its all in the wording. More scare mongering to people who dont read between the lines, and scroll thru pages.
I am pretty sure https://forums.mydigitallife.net/threads/msmg-toolkit.50572/page-655#post-1557762 (just one of the latest posts about it).
I wasn't defending them. I was pointing out that your original statement about defaulting every new user as an Administrator is incorrect.
The default user on most distros is in the sudoers group which is root with the user's password as protection, as it happens on the default Windows user with UAC. You then create if you want users with limited access, as again you can on Windows. In fact you should keep the root account locked (passwd -l) as usually is default like on Ubuntu based distros and work only on an administrative account via sudo It's logical that the default user after an OS install have admin rights, how else could the system be configured after the install