LCU isn't integrating in the 1st and the 3rd indexes at all in this build https://forums.mydigitallife.net/posts/1782729 editions with "Desktop Experience" are fine
No. It's the bleeding edge development version of the next Server. The regular updated build is still 20348.x. https://forums.mydigitallife.net/th...20348-1-fe_release.83200/page-62#post-1782253
I meant the next release of the vnext branch. The one supposed to be the regularly released update after 25314. The Canary tag had me wondering.
In that case, yes. MS just has modified their channels again, and split development channels for the client. Apart from the name change, development for Server still seems to be unchanged. Canary is the new Dev.
I haven't tryed (yet) the Server 11 based version, I'm talking about the SKU in general, looking at what I see on Server 2022 based version. BTW, i guess the Server 11 based one isn't that bad given most of the Win 11/ Server 11 regressions are affecting the GUI, and Azure HCI has no GUI...
Randomly did some comparison of resource use - processor and RAM usage with the same programs open after boot and otherwise set up the same - between this and a couple of exceptionally lite Windows 11 versions on an older 2013 laptop, quad core, 8Gb, SSD. Virtually identical. If anything, Server came out perhaps 1-2% lower in RAM usage and would idle the cpu lower and sooner. Up against the lite-est versions of 11 client? Pretty damn cool.
Like I said many times here, any NT6 OS consumes, give or take, the same resources, speaking about the main infrastructure. What makes the difference on client OSes is the added crapware, and eventually some drivers written poorly that doesnt works as intended because minimal kernel changes. So a Server 11, with the GUI fixed (via explorer patcher/ start all back or alike) is surely not any worse than Server 2022 or previous iteration. Assuming you have no use of remote FX (or no idea about what it is)