While we all know about ChatGPT a lot of other companies are on AI development. Another prominent one we all know is Nvidia. And they have 100+ partners which you can see at 12:52 min for instance. When I watched this video I had mixed feelings. What do you think about the revolution of AI? Would it come for human benefit or just to separate societies even more? How 'intelligent' are those AI's? To start a discussion I want to share this video: NVIDIA'S HUGE AI Breakthroughs Just Changed Everything (Supercut) I cannot deny that....but to me the CEO does not look like being euphoric alone....he's a touch of mania as well... What do you think about AI?
AI + chat GPT = humanity / the working class has become dispensible / obsolet = The rich / capital doesnt need us any more ..... there is no need for our existence .
A very interesting and important topic .......... but .......... i've watched 3.41 minutes so far and two things have made me feel uncomfortable . First ......... its a comercial advert from capitalists ....... and its talking in a language / science that is way above most peoples heads . Makeing claims and conclusions that most people couldnt check . Second ........ he jugeling with claims / populist beliefs / ignorance . Hard for me to explain ......... but along the lines of ......... all we need is a strong / fast enough computer and it will solve all problems ......... answer all questions ......... and maybe even go back in time and invent itself . Computers are not god . Its a machine that does what its told with the information that its given ......... it just analyses it faster and more eficient than humans ? Ai is not evil . Its not what AI does .......its what humans do with it .
1,100+ notable signatories just signed an open letter asking ‘all AI labs to immediately pause for at least 6 months’ https://techcrunch.com/2023/03/28/1...s-to-immediately-pause-for-at-least-6-months/ Elon Musk and others urge AI pause, citing 'risks to society' https://finance.yahoo.com/news/musk-experts-urge-pause-training-042927625.html 'Godfather of AI' says AI could kill humans and there might be no way to stop it https://edition.cnn.com/videos/tech...nger-artificial-intelligence-lead-ldn-vpx.cnn Why the ‘Godfather of AI’ decided he had to ‘blow the whistle’ on the technology https://edition.cnn.com/2023/05/02/tech/hinton-tapper-wozniak-ai-fears/index.html
To discuss the topic / issues fully, one has to watch the video entirely. AI and capitalists belong together. They are inseparable. You won't find AI development at companies which aren't huge capitalists (and probably a sort of monopolist)! This is one of those issues. AI won't come from those without capital. The way this advert is made is typical for high tech cooperations with big capital. It would be the same way when Google, Apple, etc. are making them... -Calling superlatives -Glorifying a new future -Pronouncing human benefit -We are the greatest and first. -Touching other scientific extent So I am afraid.....if you want to know about you have no other choice. Those all are capitalists advertising their idea of a future the same way- An advert has an advantage, though. You can see their future plans / prototypes and ideas in detail. And if you have watched such commercials before then you know most of the announced stuff will be realized in a way. If there is a difference then it's mostly a delay only. The bit where I was worried about is at 5:46min Sure it is unclear what will be details in future, but they speak out 'where' they want to interact. "Anything that has structure we can learn....and finally transform" Text to proteins, text to chemicals, blah blah to DNA. The table of 'fields' where they want to fiddle / 'transform'! DNA Chemicals Proteins Molecule This clearly implies trans-humanistic intentions. So it's not about 'singularity' at first place. It's too far-fetched. It's about what's 'in between', the transition. It's about making humans more and more machine-like / making machines more and more like humans...depending on perspective it's actually the same. Digitizing the humanity. The CEO has clearly the vision for BOTH directions at 'transformations' since you only find molecules, proteins and DNA for instance at humans and not at AI's. So his plan also includes AIs which fiddle with human DNA to manipulate there.
This new AI development is a disaster It's the beginning to the end of human species Neuralink for example .. and rest companies .. we are history .. doom day began If you watch matrix .. that is execlly what happened now
@ Cliche blah blah from me The difference between capital ....... and capitalism = how we use capital ......... how poly-tricks allows capital to be used . Capitalist interests are not human interests . But thats the whole problem we have . Capital ' owns ' the world , and poly-trickers work for capital ......... the whole system is built for and to the advantage of capital . The same old story .......... our first priority should be people , life and not profit and winning / Being the first / Being the biggest / Being the fastest / Being the richest . We need to see poly-tricks for what it is = free money for profesional parasites ........... and Poly-tricks and wealth ( = Greed ) as sorts of mental illness But how to get there when they own the government , they own the press , they have guns ......... and zero morals and ethics .......... and a bad record of past action . Example @ Cum ex scholz ------ https://web.de/magazine/politik/300...olz und Minister? Kritik an Gesetzesentwurf.3 ( another problem is .......... a lot of the foot folk ......... would rather do / try to do verbal acrobatics and score ego points in threads on forums than solve their problems ) That petition is the way to go . Just stand up in public and talk rationaly .......... and explain the problem in simple words and terms = Bypass poly-trickers and the press . >"Anything that has structure we can learn....and finally transform" .......... Text to proteins, text to chemicals, blah blah to DNA. Yes ....... but ....... its not magic ......... its only doing do able things .......... just better organised and faster . It doesnt have a life of its own ......... it does what its told . AND ......... my favorite part of computers is ......... the power plug ......... We can turn it off . its not the AI we should be worryed about its what poly-trickers do , and allow to be done , for the rich with it .
@ What it can and cant do ......... That youtube advert is takeing place in an advertising vision world ......... with no climate kacktastrophy ........ no melting ice ...... no plastic polution .......... no over population = in a styalised world not the real one ............ for it to be of any use ...... or danger ......... there would have to be a liveable planet .......... and a human population . Can AI solve any of those problems ? I wonder what AI , a machine that has no feelings , would say if it was given the data and asked what we had to do , measures we had to take ......... for the human race to survive
AI used to create new and final Beatles song, says Paul McCartney Musician says he used technology to ‘extricate’ John Lennon’s voice from an old demo and complete a decades-old song https://www.theguardian.com/music/2...ew-and-final-beatles-song-says-paul-mccartney
The topic is huge. I still don't know how to structure my posts / replies. So I pick what addresses me most. "Just better organized and faster" ..."its only doing do able things" That's the point!!! By that the doable things are raising to an unknown amount!!!! So what's then left with your "only".... Many things are not considered to be realized UNTILL the factor time plays no role anymore. In this regard a question comes up: Can we say that doing things faster as before does already mean a gain of intelligence? There are systems which behave conform to the trial and error principle. So when having here much more speed you find solutions humans would never be able to find / find it decades later! Actually those AIs are artificial programs which have the ability to optimize themselves..... speeding up combined with huge libraries which can act as memory. Therefore they can virtualize lots of different scenarios in advance. The I at AI gives rise to a lot of misunderstandings. There is still if / then to be followed which limits the 'I'. A human can overcome a certain if / then ...all the time. We don't have to follow a programmer's code.
>AIs are artificial programs which have the ability to optimize themselves..... speeding up combined with huge libraries which can act as memory. Therefore they can virtualize lots of different scenarios in advance. Yes ........ what is intelligence ? ........ and does it require consciousness ? IF we get two computers with AI programs on them ......... and get them to check each other .......... they would be electronicly conscious of eachother ......... then point them in the direction of emotions ........... that humans like and dislike things .......... and ask them what they ' thought ' about it .......... they make models about feelings ........ what they are , what they do , what function they have , what dangers they have ............... and compare them ......... and decide wich is better / worse ........... have arguments .......... would they be conscious ? If we ' told ' them what lies and dishonesty is .......... and the benefits / dangers / problems .......... would they tell lies If they disagreed with eachother would they develope complexes ? Become depressed when one ' wins ' and the other doesnt get its way ? The difference between an electronic consciousness and real consciousness ? ........ Is there one ? ........ or is it just a matter of complication ? I like the bit about designing chemicals . The difference between mda , mdma , mmda for example .......... the chemical structure differences are small but the effects are different .......... that AI could look at all the chemicals / drugs we know , and their effects , compare them ........ and see things that we couldnt see ....... corelations ........ similaritys ......... and design / sugest ones that might / could have better effects .
'Hold off from having kids if you are yet to become a parent,' warns AI expert Mo Gawdat The ex-chief business officer at Google X has issued a terrifying warning about the dangers of AI in a podcast interview. Mo Gawdat, artificial intelligence (AI) expert and ex-chief business officer at Google X, has warned people who don’t already have children should hold off as the rapid ascent of AI continues. "The risks are so bad, in fact, that when considering all the other threats to humanity, you should hold off from having kids if you are yet to become a parent," https://www.euronews.com/next/2023/...-to-become-a-parent-warns-ai-expert-mo-gawdat
IMHO such statements from "AI experts" are totally out of reality. I mean I am not sure if we already can speak of 'intelligence'...the potential danger relies already on gain of speed and the way of programming which has changed. (Code programs / optimizes code) BTW Do you know the game "No Man's Sky?" It consists of over 18 quintillion planets. Mathematicians have calculated a human would need 585 billion years to explore them all. But is it AI? 3 attributes here are important. Randomness and speed and a bit of predefined patterns. Those 3 together can 'create' a scenario / outcome that is that much unique that each individual gets its own! You can now change the perspective. It also means no matter how Individual a certain situation / condition might be it can be 'virtualized' using the same means. Speed, randomness and a bit of predefined / 'learned' patterns. What's about Google's Soundstorm???? That Gawdat dude warns others while Google is doing it even more?
Sounds very scary BUT until we can prove consciousness AKA *soul* we won't be able to replicate it! AKA the hard problem of consciousness. Until then it's just zeros and ones ! Just because i know how to put chines letters together doesn't men i understand chines.
To cut through the cr@p one should listen to one of the best authors on the subjects of AI, language and generally "human nature" - Chomsky. Sobering stuff...
>I wonder what AI , a machine that has no feelings , would say if it was given the data and asked what we had to do , measures we had to take ......... for the human race to survive Write a bible / comunist manifesto / mein kampf / the amazon catalog ? ........... sugest executing people ? .......... sugest a nuclear war ......... wich would solve at least two major human existential problems ........... very quickly ......... very cheeply .......... = over population and nuclear winter would work wonders against global warming / climate catastrophy ? >IMHO such statements from "AI experts" are totally out of reality. Yes .......... capitalist adverts ........ the press generating and spreading panic .......... and paranoia as we had with nuclear power / bombs ........ and genetic engineering / manipulation .......... wich were said to be existential problems .......... but we are still here >Just because i know how to put chines letters together doesn't men i understand chines. ChatGPT does that . >chomsky I was interested in what he had to say .......... untill he started speculating about that north see gas pipeline ........ and american involvement = not neutral , not objective .
I will tell you my thought about A.I. when I needed to have a microwave, I could buy a smart Microwave instead ... I bought a stupid one, with 2 buttons only we let the technology manage us -> instead of managing the technology let's say in the future all cars will be automatic, managed by smart AI computer we now start losing abilities, now we all become stupid and will lose abilities to drive we should not let A.I. Smart computers manage us. and it could be our future and let's say the government will control this A.I. tech. we will not have any more privacy we become stupid, invisible, numbers, A.I. will start to manage everything. that could be are future if we do not stop it. I hope not.
another good example of how we become stupid is by without gpt-4, we have to search, look if we have a coding problem, we try to figure out a solution now lets ask gpt-4, why try ,,, why bother ,,, gpt4 have the answer we become a stupid society that depends on Smart gpt-4 A.I. model
Nvidia is out hand at this moment that tech is booming!!!! i bought about 100 shares of stock about 10 years ago and now im glad i did