HHS Secretary Becerra: 'Absolutely the government's business' to know which Americans haven't been vaccinated https://www.foxnews.com/media/xavie...ernment-business-americans-not-vaccinated.amp What's next? Home visits at gunpoint to freely make a decision on to get or not vaccinated? In front of your children and neighbors?
This is what you're after demential leftist transvestite dressed in pink aren't you? A dystopian world painted with pink color.
This is a very detailed talk. Interesting for all those who want to know details about the vaccine development. Malone has deep insights. He talks nicely about what he did and where he is expert. I like to listen to him, he explains very well and he is very prudent. This video is not short but to 'assess' Malone a must watch @gorski (and others) and also interesting for those who just want to learn more about the new vaccines. It's a lecture. And here are the data packages I talked about and which are also discussed in the video: (Some of them data haven't been disclosed before!) Pfizer Clinical Protocol: https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf Women & Nurses Study: https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab465/6279075 Japanese Pfizer Data Package: https://trialsitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Pfizer-report_Japanese-government.pdf And also Dr. Byram Bridle's Guide for Parents: "COVID-19 Vaccines and Children:A Scientist’s Guide for Parents". https://www.canadiancovidcareallian...n-and-COVID-19-Vaccines-full-guide_-FINAL.pdf
I did a little searching and ran across this chart that pretty much spells out I have a cold, not Covid-19. But I might have a variant of SARS. Today is day 3 of the Ivermectin dosage, and I don't know if I can contribute the lessening of the sneezing attacks, as well as the lessening of the painful coughs that I was experiencing last Friday and Saturday. So from where I stand it looks like the sooner you get to using Ivermectin after the onslaught of symptoms the better. I'm here to tell you once you get things straightened out the dosage procedure is a walk in the part. Now that my symptoms have been taken under control, I need to take the next step. Since it's clear that my lungs are full of fluid, and my body is doing everything it can to get rid of the fluid, it still is annoying to say the least. So off to the local pharmacy and got some Sudafed. I've used it in the past with good results, but my only concern is that it might be interrupting the natural cleansing my body is doing with the fluid in my lungs. I figured dialing back the dosage to only 3 pills a day might be a happy medium, instead of the recommended 4-6 pills per day. BTW, I got the naproxen sodium & pseudoephedrine HCl version, *not* any of the "PE" ones. The pseudoephedrine version is absorbed 100% whereas the PE version is only absorbed 40%. I started taking the Sudafed today Tuesday 7/13 and we'll see how it goes to suppress the sneezing attacks. I've suffered no adverse effect of using the 1-1/2 g/cc daily dosage of Ivermectin, The results have been positive, and hopefully I can wrap up this treatment by the end of this week, and put everything away and wait for the real Covid-19 infection or as been demonstrated by this initial walk through, it looks like Ivernectin can be used for other SARS infections, or for that matter the common cold. Who knew. But I have to thank you Yen, for all the good advice on procedures, dosages, and other helpful info to me, a n00b when it comes to this stuff. There's no way I could have got to where I am today, without your help. I am in your debt. .
I am glad that I can share something I do professionally. I am no medical professional, but familiar with drug design and pharmacology and I like research. There is a medical joke:" When you have a common cold and you take meds it takes 1 week until one recovers. When you take nothing it takes 7 days." Usually we only treat symptoms. When you ask different persons regarding common cold there are several personal ways of treatment. And that is good. Important is to try stuff and to observe. To treat symptoms is mostly OK, the body can fight the pathogen without further support. A common cold can escalate, though. If it is bacterial we might need the support of antibiotics (I only take such as a last resort....for instance when the lungs got inflammation and I have got fever and you can hear noise (stethoscope)) Most doctors IMHO do prescribe antibiotics far too soon. When it is viral, we don't have many useful meds. The body has to fight on its own. Each running nose is usually caused by viral infection. And viruses like rhinovirus and human corona virus are mostly harmless. Now with IVM we have a drug that blocks 4 mechanisms of SARS-Cov-2 replication and one anti-inflammatory mechanism. And by that the chance it works for other viruses as well. Generally I can recommend for any congestion / mucous related 'colds' to drink a lot of water during the day. And if there is no problem with taste some fresh ginger tea during day.. If wanted one can block cough during bedtime BUT not all the time. (The stuff needs to get out of the body). I personally take an analgesic such as Ibuprofen and for bedtime a decongestant nasal spray (I hate to breathe through my mouth when sleeping) But no longer than one week. Pseudo-ephedrine is vaso-constrictive. It actually belongs to the indirect sympathomimetic drugs 'stimulants' therefore a side effect can be insomnia. If you have problems with sleep…. I actually find vaso-constrictive agents only useful for the nasal area so one can breathe through the nose at night… As for COVID I finally could get my 3 conventional favorite drugs. The problem is that I cannot prescribe meds. But I am allowed to have the pure drug as a reference. So I have to go my own ways. All them 3 are prescription only. It is local regulation, though. I have got IVM from India. I have got Fluoxetin (Fluvoxamine I could not get) and Budesonide from a doc I know. As soon as I get symptoms I try IVM as well. Want to see if and how it works. And also I am very curious what it can do against other viruses, I am sure more IVM studies will follow. P.S. For self-medication I also suggest to check for drug-drug interactions before on https://www.drugs.com/drug_interactions.html And always have a close focus on side effects. To interrupt the drug then is reasonable to check if they go away and then to continue with either a lower dose or a split dose….or if possible an replacement drug.
Why the video above showing an elder woman with magnetism in her body after vaccination is not available? Because the associated account was terminated. Censorship... Why? For exposing the f truth?
Man, ask the people who afraid the truth (like Pinky & Soft-Sensitive). They has nothing to say, but they are repeating the "global opinion". The conspiracy theories - because for the human mind it's hard to believe! Why we should believe that the RT-PCR (known as PCR) should be used to the prevention (tests people), if the independent test shows that has (only) up-to 40% of efficacy? Taking a sample to this test can damage the nose-brain septum! Covids-Passports in some countries... another bad joke... You should ask ALL THE PEOPLE, why they allow for this and that? As well, where there are their free will which they received when they was born?
Vaccine Adverse Events in the US VAERS System Someone in the comments says Ivermectin is now illegal for doctors to prescribe. Is it true? Someone from Netherlands confirm please.
That's it - we're all dead in the next few months! Not because we have not vaccinated ourselves but because we HAVE vaccinated ourselves.... Genius!
Then watch this: Imagine how I feel knowing all this already. Some points to add, though. There is efficacy, but based on a weak data set. Moderna: Cases: 196 [185/11] means 94.05% 'efficacy'. Pfizer: Cases: 170 [162/8] means 95.06% 'efficacy' NOT even 200 people!!! It is pointless that they have enrolled more than 20,000 participants. AZ: Cases: In participants who received two standard doses, vaccine 'efficacy' was 62.1% and in participants who received a low!!! dose followed by a standard dose, 'efficacy' was 90.0% Efficacy is not effectivity. Effectivity means how many people in real life get prevented from getting the sickness. The big issue at those vaccines (which are actually no vaccines, but gene therapeutics) is you do not know about the amount of S proteins an individual body does make. The amount of mRNA or vector virus particles is determined but each bio-activity of an individual is different. It's like person A takes 2 pills and person B 8 pills. (And those taking 8..well some of them might have died) And the lack of preclinical studies about teratogenicity, bio-distribution, long term (2y) follow-up... etc etc. I can only repeat.....at our research for new drugs...people would have said ..are you insane? You never get this approved without those data.
I've been pounding the table on the 95% effectiviness BS since it was first published.In each of the studies there were say 20,000 people in the study, yet less than 200 were considered a valid sample to come up with the dffectiviness of the jab. One thing that I found interesting in the video was how the mRNA actually works. https://videopress.com/v/p8R7ebPy Starts at the 3:00 mark .
Early treatment is key Early treatment is key repeat with me Early treatment is key Early treatment is key