Do they really believe I'm going to swallow this one given the overwhelming amount of scientific evidence? Those articles are for gullible people not knowing science, not having idea about scientific establishment, not having common sense and not knowing the true dark face of Pharmafia. Btw I believe most vaccinated people which do not show post-vaccination symptoms, they received a placebo shot solely.
No, they are communicating this to the intelligent AND open-minded, you know, Humans, people who can actually learn...
Yen: Can you comment on whether or not this is a scam or not. Seems lots of people are ordering Ivermectin from there but I wonder if they are legit and actually selling the real thing or just a sugar pill in an Ivermectin box. https://www.alldaychemist.com/catal...ite&utm_medium=banner&utm_campaign=ivermectin .
POLITICO: 3rd conservative radio host who condemned vaccines dies of Covid. https://www.politico.com/states/flo...-who-condemned-vaccines-dies-of-covid-1390555 Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19 https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consu...-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19 More info on use in Bangladesh https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33278625/
Oh I'm such a stupid as its finest. What I was thinking, a horse dewormer? What an asshole I am, if The Guardian says so then must be true!!! NO WAIT!!! Even a mindless poor soul of the worse kind I am, if the FDA tells so then must be the absolute truth. How I dare !! They are health authorities and want all the best for us... EVERYONE!!! LISTEN UP!! REPEAT WITH ME!! No Ivermectin for me, I'm not a horse but a human No Ivermectin for me, I'm not a horse but a human No Ivermectin for me, I'm not a horse but a human No Ivermectin for me, I'm not a horse but a human... However and in the meanwhile Walgreens selling a horse dewormer for human since forever? https://www.walgreens.com/rx-druginfo/pharmacy/finddrug/druginfodrugdetails?drugId=16745
Apparently,"dont use dewormer", has been lost on him. It's hilarious how people are ready to question the vaccine, but are also ready to swallow anything else available without thought! Like for example bleach You can see the adverse effects here And you can read here too.
Hmm Let's start again: FDA, WHO and other health authorities disapprove and warns vs Ivermectin However and in the meanwhile Walgreens selling a horse dewormer for human since forever? https://www.walgreens.com/rx-druginfo/pharmacy/finddrug/druginfodrugdetails?drugId=16745
Oh brother if you had actually read the article I posted then you would have seen this in it. People use dewormers on humans for example I know some vets give dewormer to their kids yearly . But it's the dosage, it's a very small amount. How much are you going to swallow, it works by body weight. If you take the dosage a horse would get then your liver will have an issue. Tylenol or advil it's probably fine to take one but not the whole bottle in 24 hours, you can get liver failure. Same principle I would suspect. Then there is the 3rd party drug interactions etc.
Oh brother if you had actually read my comment... I'm mocking FDA's alarmist warning Childish. They are treating people like little kids. Scaring people saying Ivermectin is for horses cows not actual humans. Ridiculous. My comment has nothing to do with doses.
Of course, Ivermectin can be safely applied in humans and that has been done so ever since it's discovery: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivermectin#Medical_uses It's the dose that makes it safe or unsafe. So the FDA is basically saying you should not use it against Covid because the large animal dosage is too high for humans. Of course it is. And yes, we're no horses or other animals, but still quite a few drugs for veterinary medicine are also used in humans, safe and effectively (ketamine, for example) - without anyone saying it's stupid.
I think the worry is that those who take it "think" this is OK as the only thing they should/could do, more than anything... Also, R2deetoo's point: "Then there is the 3rd party drug interactions etc."
Stanford's Dr. John Ioannidis Destroys The Covid Lockdown Narrative! https://rumble.com/vj8b4x-stanfords-dr.-john-ioannidis-destroys-the-covid-lockdown-narrative.html
People if you want to get a jab of any vaccines available do it, but such choice must be informed. Don't believe all the official rhetoric has to communicate. Precautionary principle, apply it, use it. Post-mortem findings in vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia https://haematologica.org/article/view/haematol.2021.279075
I did more research and I came across that video. It's an interview of an israeli PhD. (Which name is Ariel Israel, kida funny) He's talking exclusively about the Pfizer vaccine and primarily the TH2 arm of the adaptive immune system which is also called humoral immunity. (b cells, plasma cells, antibodies). The other arm TH1 also called cellular response, is actually excluded since t cell immunity is far more harder to measure. At the end he is saying (they are administering booster shots already) that data have to show how effective the 3rd shot will be. Anyway some interesting points from the interview: Fully vaccinated people have a 10 times greater AB level / titer than people from natural infections (10000 AU/mL compared to 1000). The waning rate is 40% per month. At natural infection AB levels are firstly INcreasing after recovery and then they start to decline. The waning rate is 5% per month only, though. Current natural infections cause a better protection than the vaccine. Already recovered people who got vaccinated after have most AB levels after vaccination. So applying this to your question. (And we can only argue on the TH2 arm, AKA antibody levels) We'd have to consider the different waning rates and the far higher initial AB level at the vaccine. We'd also have to consider quality of AB versus quantity. When you go for a booster you restore the AB level you had right after you've been fully vaccinated. This level is 10 times higher than those at natural infection. On the other hand those ABs have a lower quality since delta has mutated. This means some of them created from epitopes which have mutated at the S protein have become useless. First point. Second point: Those epitopes which are new now don't have an AB which can attach. As an result there will be parts at the spike protein remaining uncovered. The question now is: Can a 10 times higher AB level compensate that? And if yes how long? He said that natural infection (with delta) does create a better protection than the vaccines. Compared to wuhan they said vaccines are almost as good as natural infection's protection. This means it cannot fully compensate the lack of quality. But anyway you should get a higher protection (again) concerning infection after taking the booster. Also for delta (10 times higher in quantity does have an effect on delta, too. But it won't reach the original protection they had at original wuhan virus...and probably does wane quickly by a rate of 40% per month soon to ready state levels one has had either.) If you get a higher efficacy at the still good efficacy concerning severe covid / death is unclear. TBH I have a sort of stomachache pushing the immune system again to 10 times higher levels compared to natural levels. If I would I only can agree using a modified vaccine which encodes for delta and that at a lower dosage as a booster. Here is the vid: What I know about so far.... Long haul is real and since it includes psychological issues some doctors think that people do have 'nothing' but are just depressed. It's a shame. The recent theory is that those individuals have problems with their immune system (activated, non classical M2 monocytes). It seems the S1 subunit of the spike is responsible for that. Also MAS plays a role, probably. (Mast cell activation syndrome.). There are 3 major approaches. Anti-viral drugs Steroids to suppress the immune system and after stopping them to kick-start the immune system again. Anti histamines against MAS. Well, the IVM boxes on the page seem to be legit. But what you really get is another question. When I ordered IVM from a pharma vendor I cross-checked against original manufacturer which is Iverheal from Healing Pharma. Since I have to do with meds myself I can make an opinion about quality from checking it physically first. Since we do not have a reference to IVM, the substance itself, we did a quick test to see if it is pure at least. The tablets I have got contain one pure active drug which fits to one value of a reference value found in literature. (Rf value obtained from TLC= thin layer chromatography) This is of course from a scientific point not sufficient to characterise the full quality of the tablets. But I am fine with that. You actually need the reference substance and then to analyse the tablets using HPLC. (High performance liquid chromatography).
Thanx, @Yen! Misunderstanding: I meant the article from DW/Der Spiegel, which I can't find in English/German, hence the quote in Serbo-Croat... Therefore, the large numbers do not lie... Now, coupled with adequate MEASURES, the programme is working as intended... at least for now...
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...-a-luxury-and-protect-the-vulnerable-says-who Covid booster jabs ‘not a luxury’ and protect the vulnerable, says WHO Health body previously stated that boosters in Europe are unnecessary and will increase vaccine inequality A booster jab of Covid-19 vaccine for vulnerable people is not a luxury but a good way to protect them, the World Health Organization has said, as surging infection rates and a pan-European vaccination slowdown produced a “deeply worrying” situation. “A third dose of vaccine is not a luxury booster taken away from someone who is still waiting for a first jab,” Dr Hans Kluge, the WHO’s regional director for Europe, said on Monday. “It’s basically a way to keep the most vulnerable safe.”