Thanx, I'll have to have a listen... "The women were 29 and 23 weeks along in their pregnancies, respectively", the Corpus Christi - Nueces County Public Health District announced Friday. The deaths of their unborn children are considered to be “COVID-19 related fetal demise during pregnancy,” the health district said in a news release. “These are the first two known cases of fetal demise related to COVID-19 in Nueces County since the beginning of the pandemic in March 2020,” the health district reported. https://amp.miamiherald.com/news/co...TAqW0w1mD1b_t5mM9fbNzYqUspHn1wKbBPBeB2OkMXgII Two unborn babies die after their unvaccinated moms got COVID, Texas officials say
Drug To Treat Adverse Effects Related To Immunopathology Like several colleagues, I have spent several months trying to communicate to people the risk posed by vaccines since most induce our cells to produce the SARS-CoV-2 protein that is responsible for the COVID-19 picture. severe. Sometimes it's hard for me (and I get a little desperate, I confess) seeing that many seem not to understand what that fact about Spike means. I have used analogies of scorpion venom in some of my presentations, but even so, it does not seem that the message reaches everyone or at least, it does not seem to permeate everyone who receives it. It is a matter of simple logic: 1. The severe clinical picture that the SARS-CoV-2 virus can cause (in a low percentage of infected) is due to the spike protein of the virus. 2. Spike causes harm even if it is administered alone, that is, without the virus 3. The mRNA and vectored vaccines induce our cells to produce Spike 4. There is, therefore, the picture of COVID-19 due to the Spike of the vaccine Four simple points but they do not seem to be understandable when what covers the eyes and the mind is fear (or interests?). And those points do not even mention the damage caused by the ADE process (antibody-induced disease magnification) and immunopathology that can also occur and that I have already explained in other messages and seminars. I have not seen before, and have looked, a scientific study that proposes a drug to treat adverse effects of a vaccine. However, I just saw it as a preprint. Wang and colleagues have submitted an article on a candidate drug to treat damage caused by non-neutralizing antibodies (https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.13.452194v2). The drug they propose is based on metal ester N-acetylneuraminic acid (NANA-Me) that works by blocking the binding of imperfect antibodies to damaged cells. Obviously, it is a first study and in no way am I recommending the use of this drug, but the important thing about the news is that it is already perceived - at least by some members of the scientific community - the need for treatment of some adverse effects - in this case ADE and immunopathology - generated after vaccination. The study mentions that NANA-Me could also be used in cases of COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. In other words, again it is seen that there are similarities in the damage that leads to viral COVID-19 and vaccine COVID-19. How much more evidence is needed for us to change course in handling this situation? I hope this information is useful to you, Karina AW https://t.me/akashacomunidad/506
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58410354 Being fully vaccinated against Covid-19 not only cuts the risk of catching it, but also of an infection turning into long Covid, research led by King's College London suggests. It shows that in the minority of people who get Covid despite two jabs, the odds of developing symptoms lasting longer than four weeks are cut by 50%. This is compared with people who are not vaccinated. So far, 78.9% of people in the UK have had two doses of a Covid vaccine. Many people who get Covid recover within four weeks but some have symptoms that continue or develop for weeks and months after the initial infection - sometimes known as long Covid. It can happen after people experience even mild coronavirus symptoms. The researchers, whose work was published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases, say it is clear that vaccinations are saving lives and preventing serious illness, but the impact of vaccines on developing long-lasting illness has been less certain.
Just wanna mention. There are articles in public media, there are scientific articles published in scientific journals and..there are 'just' talks about professors / docs involved in fighting covid in their dally life and they try to figure out about measures and even do own research....and they 'doctor' to cure, that simple! Look, I learned the latter is most important to consider in regards to covid and rather secondly good works published in scientific journals....one can continue to post statistics from officials..but what is their real value? Just heard personally from a doc kids are not affected from covid nor do they get long covid! And IF they were they had a bunch of comorbidities.. Anything else is said to get the vaccines to the kids.(for the sake of profit). Vaccination might protect some adults from getting long covid and I heard it resolved long covid after vaccination...OK, but I also heard long covid syndromes occurred after vaccination...
Are you serious you had to mention it? Everyone here is smart enough to already know and understand that. It's just some people only trust in the cleverness of the "fox" and its cute "skin" and "colors". No? Take a look: Spoiler: Fox Ain't that cute, clever and true? Sacrilege! Careful! You're going to far. You're gonna be accused of scaring people from getting vaccinated and they'll die cause there's no other way out from this covid thing ! Let alone you'll be called conspiranoid!
Dear Akasha Community members: I share with you this epidemiological study (https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v4-i8-14) that was published a few days ago in the International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis. The article, written by Aparicio-Alonso et al., Evaluated the incidence of sequelae associated with "long COVID-19" in 161 patients treated with ClO2 solution (CDS). The odds ratio (OR, for its acronym in English: Odds Ratio) and the relative risk (RR) were evaluated to compare said incidence of sequelae with the data published in another recent study (López-León et al. 2021; doi: 10.1101 / 2021.01.27.21250617). The most common sequelae were fatigue, hair loss, shortness of breath, trouble concentrating, and difficulty falling asleep. Patients treated conventionally in addition to CDS had a lower incidence (2.7 times lower) of sequelae than that observed in the literature, while patients who were treated exclusively with CDS had a more marked reduction in incidence (6.14 times less) of long-lasting sequelae. The authors report that patients who are treated with CDS are 19% less likely to experience long-lasting effects on their health than those who receive conventional treatment for COVID-19. I hope this study is useful for you and I send you greetings, Karina AW https://t.me/akashacomunidad/508 COVID19 Long Term Effects in Patients Treated with Chlorine Dioxide http://ijmra.in/v4i8/14.php More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-95565-8
Now, this is one helluva blow to rationality in @Yen, I must say... Not so long ago you were adamant that it was the figures that prove definitively that since the death rate is soooo low - it's close to nothing, that almost no measures are needed, that we are overreacting and so on... Now that the figures are quite clear - they do not count, 'scuse the pun... Seriously, @Yen?!?
And then, there's a bit of reality hitting one where it hurts... Dr. McElyea said patients are packing his eastern and southeastern Oklahoma hospitals after taking ivermectin doses meant for a full-sized horse, because they believed false claims the horse de-wormer could fight COVID-19. “The ERs are so backed up that gunshot victims were having hard times getting to facilities where they can get definitive care and be treated,” he said. That’s something McElyea said is now backing up ambulance systems as well. “All of their ambulances are stuck at the hospital waiting for a bed to open so they can take the patient in and they don’t have any, that’s it,” said Dr. McElyea. “If there’s no ambulance to take the call, there’s no ambulance to come to the call.” KFOR.COM Patients overdosing on ivermectin backing up rural Oklahoma hospitals, ambulances
Not said they do not count?!? I numerated public media, scientific publication and 'doctoring' and assigned importance to the latter..and asked the people about thoughts about those number's real value (opinions). IMHO the value per se does not matter at first place, but the influences on raise / fall do. I also did not say measures are not needed /overreacting, I claimed for evidence based effects...they were mostly applied following this logic: Well they surely do not raise the numbers, so they can be only beneficial...I missed evidence base. The subject vaccines for kids is a very sensitive subject to me... According to Ariel Israel vaccines create an AB level which is 10 times higher than natural infection. This is a signal for potential of trouble. And especially at kids where the immune system is still developing....nobody can really say what influence those vaccines will have in the future. And getting back to numbers. To make a valid decision for or against vaccination there is only one value relevant. The proper individual risk / benefit analyses...and that job is done by those docs and not by 'general numbers'. I find it shocking to spread fear saying to parents (some media do) your kids might get long covid and at the same time I hear from several doctors that it plays no role at their daily life...
Some kids will get it, out of many who will deffo get infected - the question is, can it be prevented with better measures (public health policy), which are withdrawn?!? I would not have withdrawn a number of them, having in mind that I would be playing with other people's lives!!! As for numbers: you are now trying to wriggle out of your "suggestions" - the earlier numbers were favourable to your obsession at the time, fuelled by your the then guru ("it's not a pandemic, the numbers are too low", blah-blah) and now you are trying to minimise the importance of numbers, when they are clearly pointing in the opposite direction from such "evaluations" of yours... C'mon, @Yen, 'fess up...
Yahoo! Voices: WHO Lists Mu as 'Variant of Interest'. https://www.yahoo.com/news/lists-mu-variant-interest-121518838.html Newsweek: A Doomsday COVID Variant Worse Than Delta and Lambda May Be Coming, Scientists Say. https://www.newsweek.com/2021/08/13...lambda-may-coming-scientists-say-1615874.html Ok we are getting there to the boat without a paddle. Remember I said it first https://forums.mydigitallife.net/threads/coronavirus-discussion.81224/page-34#post-1608451
Deadline: Mu Covid Variant: Los Angeles Officials Say First Cases Of New Strain Have Arrived. https://deadline.com/2021/09/mu-variant-los-angeles-first-cases-new-covid-1234827340/ The Guardian Australia: What is C.1.2, the new Covid variant in South Africa, and should we be worried?. https://www.theguardian.com/austral...iant-in-south-africa-and-should-we-be-worried Forbes: Here's What We Know About C.1.2.—South Africa's New, Highly Mutated Covid Variant. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemima...uth-africas-new-highly-mutated-covid-variant/ What 11 Billion People Mean for Disease Outbreaks https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-11-billion-people-mean-disease-outbreaks/
This is old stuff where we never got agreement. Don't want to cook this soup again. Just saying that I scientifically reasoned my thinking. It was about (primarily) 2 points. The purpose of PCR tests, that they cannot be used alone to determine illness and the John Ioannidis study about the NPI's effects (non pharmaceutical interventions). Found rather something new I want to share. 3 papers. "Infection-enhancing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies recognize both the original Wuhan/D614G strain and Delta variants. A potential risk for mass vaccination?" This works describes that they found that original wuhan AB's against the spike can create an infection-enhancing effect when bound to delta. This is a signal for issues. https://www.journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-4453(21)00392-3/fulltext An original CDC paper: "Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Including COVID-19 Vaccine Breakthrough Infections, Associated with Large Public Gatherings — Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July 2021" This confirms the UK paper that the peak levels of delta virus are similar (vaccinated / unvaccinated). This means shedding is exactly the same regardless of vaccination. It adds a high breakthrough rate additionally (74%). And 3rd (which is a preprint in The Lancet so far). "Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant Among Vaccinated Healthcare Workers, Vietnam" https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3897733 My short opinion: It seems the effects of the vaccines have shrunken to one effect. They still protect against severe symptoms / hospitalisation. They have no effect on spreading of delta. And there is a second signal of trouble. (besides of the 10 times higher ABs), infection-enhancing when Wuhan ABs bind to delta spikes. Just saying 'signalling' before somebody starts to argue.
In 2014, a study was published by Wang and colleagues (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092860/) where they described the process by which the antibodies generated against the SARS coronavirus ( SARS-CoV-1) generate antibody disease magnification (ADE). Using an in vitro model, they describe how ADE is caused by antibodies directed against the Spike protein and not against other proteins. In their study, they found that ADEs occur when there is a low amount of antibodies while a high amount of antibodies neutralizes the effect. The interesting thing is that in the current context, it is not the "low" amount of antibodies in vaccinated people that is being a problem. It is vociferous that the increase in cases, hospitalizations and deaths (clearly evident in Israel and many other countries that exceeded 60% vaccination of their population two months ago) derives from the need for a third booster dose (or fourth, or fifth ....). However, in this case it is not that low levels of antibodies are generated in those vaccinated - it is that these antibodies do not serve to effectively neutralize the SARS-CoV-2 variants that now circulate on the planet. These vaccine antibodies can actually make things worse by helping you infect cells that would not have been infected otherwise. In the study, Wang and colleagues wrote: "In this study we ... found that ADE associated with SARS-CoV infection is primarily mediated by anti-spike antibodies. It is our hope that this information will be useful in the development of a human SARS-CoV vaccine "(translation:" In this study we ... found that ADE associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection is mediated primarily by Anti-Spike antibodies. We hope this information will be useful for the development of a vaccine against SARS-CoV for humans. "It was known; beyond the studies carried out in animal models to test the safety of vaccines against SARS-CoV-1 (which reported immune pathology in all vaccinated animals when after they faced the circulating virus), the ADE mechanism caused by antibodies against Spike had been described ... only 5 years 5 months before pharmaceutical companies began to develop rapidly (and voraciously). this evidence, they chose Spike as the molecular "target" of the vaccines. It is important - fundamental - in science to look at what has been researched and understood by others, and to avoid ignoring that knowledge until it is updated with new studies that contradict it. It is also fundamental in science to have the humility to say "I was wrong". It seems to me that both fundamental things have disappeared in recent times. In other messages and seminars, I have explained why ADE is less likely to occur in people who developed natural immunity against SARS-CoV-2 than in vaccinated people, and I invite you to look up this information if you have any questions. I hope the study is useful to you and I send you greetings, Karina AW https://t.me/akashacomunidad/513
Even the BBC has to publish it: Risk of myocarditis in 12-17 year olds exceeds any benefit: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58438669. Damage to the muscle cells of the heart cannot heal, nor can that tissue regenerate, so the damage to your heart is permanent. The article does not talk about young people between 18 and 30, but in them (especially in men) there is also an increase in myocarditis and pericarditis, as well as fulminant heart attacks, according to VAERS and Eudravigillance. I hope this information is useful to you. Karina AW https://t.me/akashacomunidad/514
Yeah, you don't want to... and then all this... Your point was: "numbers/mortality are too low, ergo it can not be a pandemic" (the Buddhist guy). Now you are saying "We can not be putting much weight on numbers." Seriously, @Yen?!? C'mon, man... Don't insult us... Thanx for the rest!!! Btw... And signalling is precisely... what?!?
There is understandable concern about the genomic evolution of SARSCoV2, and just the term 'mutation' can feel scary. Partly to alleviate such fears and more generally to provide an overview of the current situation, we wrote a review. 1/ https://t.co/CeAZbaNQgm https://t.co/7fwZfpM6ce
Science to the people. Evidence-based information, easy to understand for a layman: https://lbry.tv/@AkashaComunidad:f/La-pandemia-y-su-manejo-desde-la-mirada-de-Darwin-:1
ADE has attracted attention at dengue vaccine trials on the Philippines. It also played a role at SARS vaccine development. At SARS-CoV-2 vaccination it played no role so far. Wuhan ABs created by the vaccine could not be 'used' to provoke ADE at original Wuhan virus. There was already one signal, though. The vaccines make 10 times more of ABs than natural infections. Now at the study I posted recently they confronted wuhan ABs with the delta virus and got increased facilitating antibodies. You can also use the term 'indicating'. At vaccine development you try to mimic the natural infection as close as you can without getting the symptoms of the natural infections. Therefore you check and compare several values. If you now detect a significant difference somewhere then it is a signal. (At first place for a potential of lets say trouble). When you go further now and compare to past experiences and determined issues like ADE and you had there the same signal (for instance increased amount of ABs) THEN one can say there is a signal for ADE, too. This is far away from proof, though. It is 'just' a signal to keep in mind and to keep the eyes open for further observations. We seemingly have now 2 signals of ADE at current corona vaccines. One is 10 times higher AB levels and one is increased facilitating antibodies when wuhan ABs bind to delta. Counter measures could be: Update the vaccines to delta, leave out NTD related epitopes and decrease the dosage. ADE is antibody dependent enhancement. There are several mechanisms observed where ABs can make it easier for the virus to infect. The ABs which are called facilitating antibodies do add additional mechanisms of infections (ways to capture a cell) which the virus wouldn't have without them attached there. When you make vaccines you have to make a decision. From that point onwards the vaccine is as it is. It is static. The viruses of concerns, though, are naturally changing viruses, they are dynamic. Facilitating antibodies detected are binding to the NTD. (Study by Li et al, compare there 'Abstract') Short: Neutralizing ABs 'The good ones' affinity has decreased at delta Facilitating antibodies Those which may cause ADE. Affinity has increased at delta. The article expressed that like. At dengue vaccine trials kids who got vaccinated suffered from a severe progress after natural infection with another strain of dengue. Far more than the unvaxxed. The vaccines created more ABs than natural infection (quantity) and seemingly also more facilitating antibodies. (quality). (Those mentioned 2 signals). Yeah well. I was not without emotions all the time. Although the definition of pandemic has drastically changed after the swine-flu. And no I did not say we cannot be putting much weight on numbers. I said it they do not play that role at first place. The influences on raise / fall do much more.
You don't hear much talk about Sildenafil nowadays. What's Sildenafil? Well it's more commonly known as Viagra. Seens that Pfizer came up with this drug for treatment of hypertension. Got FDA approval and it was prescribed for it's intended use. But having somewhat questionable results reducing hypertension, it had the side effect of increasing erections in men. Once this got around the prescriptions for "Hypertension" went up dramatically. I'm sure that there are many instances where the FDA probably discounted and discouraged the use of Sildenafil for anything other than Hypertension. But what do you know. At Pfizer's request the FDA revised the use of Sildenafil. And with that change, Pfizer enjoyed a Billion dollars in sales that first year, with the old Sildenafil now prescribed as Viagra. So here we are today, when the FDA could put forth the same efforts regarding Ivermectin, that it did for Sildenafil. But then Pfizer would lose the billions of dollars in revenue that it now gets from the Covid-19 jab. Money doesn't talk, it swears. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/fda-approves-viagra . .