Hmm. I saw posts from you where you wouldn't 4786 cases consider as very very rare..but wait it's the vaccines... I did a VAERS query on 2 heart related issues. Query Criteria: Symptoms: MYOCARDITIS; PERICARDITIS Vaccine Products: COVID19 VACCINE (COVID19) Group By: Symptoms Show Totals: True Show Zero Values: False MYOCARDITIS 2,813 PERICARDITIS 1,973 Total 4,786 reported cases This is for the US. VAERS is an open database, feel free to do your own searching...
There is a teeny-weeny bit of information missing here, so we could put a real value on it, dontchafink?!?
For instance: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...vid-suggests-study?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other “While myocarditis after vaccination is exceptionally rare, we may be able to change the first or second doses or combine vaccines differently to avoid the risk at all, once we understand the physiology better,” said Prof Faust. “On balance, there is no urgency to immunise children from a medical perspective, although if schools are unable to maintain education for the vast majority at all times, the overall balance could shift. If my two teenage children are offered the vaccine by the NHS my GP wife and I will have no hesitation in allowing them to receive the vaccine.”
Well you can specify the search to get more info. For instance when you list males under the age of 40 you get the risk group. (High absolutes there). Right, I forgot the subject reporting sensitivity of VAERS database. There is a general study, but referred to other AE's (adverse events) We do never get all cases reported. Sometimes only 12% https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33039207/ 4768 is low. BUT we have to consider underreporting and the fact that it affects males under the age of 40 most. I am not concerned by the number. I am concerned about the fact that many adverse events are related to the S protein, the S1 sub-unit. Unfortunately the vaccine makers have decided even to make this part as being an antigen. The S1 sub-unit has pathogenic properties for sure. It's also involved in post and long haul
They did so because they knew very well the consequences. Don't you see what's going on here? Really? Covid suddenly appears out of the blue then Mass vaccination then Vaccine side effects disguised as "variants waves" then More vaccines to the world then More covid contagions then Infinite loop of sickness and deaths I asked before in previous posts: Why makers didn't choose nucleocapsid or any other viral component which does not have a high mutation rate as the S protein and is infinitely less harmful to convert as an antigen?
Why being so lazy? The web is full of papers. Just google s1 subunit spike and you find papers like listed below. Dr. Bruce Patterson and his team are great long haul and post covid researchers. He makes great efforts to help those people https://covidlonghaulers.com/ I posted already a video where he got interviewed about "Spike Proteins In Immune Cells - Dr. Bruce Patterson Discusses COVID Long Haul" Scientific work about: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.25.449905v1.full.pdf Hits by google: "SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 subunit induces pro-inflammatory responses via toll-like receptor 4 signaling in murine and human macrophages." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33644468/ "Free SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein S1 Particles May Play a Role in the Pathogenesis of COVID-19 Infection" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772528/ Also tests in transgenic mice: "The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit S1 induces COVID-19-like acute lung injury in Κ18-hACE2 transgenic mice and barrier dysfunction in human endothelial cells" https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/ajplung.00223.2021 Or early tests in mice: "The S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood–brain barrier in mice" https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-020-00771-8 etc...etc... AFAIK BNT162b1 the precursor of current Pfizer vaccine encoded for the RBD only. (Receptor Binding Domain a part of the S Protein). As a scientific approach it makes sense to use that part as an antigen that connects to ACE2 in order to enter the cell. You'd expect neutralizing ABs. If you take the N protein you get binding ABs which do not bind to a strategically functional part of the virus. Strategically important parts do mutate more frequently. That is a natural mechanism. The German guy Prof Stöcker who did his own vaccine LubecaVax was clever enough to use the RBD alone. He mixed it with a common adjuvant which is also used in hepatitis vaccines.
I wanted sources from which you draw such conclusions, that's why... Thanx, will have a look if "pathogen" is the right word here...
For me it became the right word after reading Patterson's work especially that bit where he clearly detected the S1 subunit within those monocytes......but there where 'hints' like...may play a role...."Free SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein S1 Particles May Play a Role in the Pathogenesis of COVID-19 Infection" Patterson found the S1 subunit in non classical monocytes CD16+ up to 15 months after infection. The former theory was like there is 'some viral debris' which cares for ongoing waves of inflammatory processes....
The question makes no sense. It's about significance. The paper / works has looked on people who suffered from PASC already (Post Sequelae of COVID-19) Then they did labs and then they found statistical significance. To answer your question, though, you have to go through Patterson paper and make an own decision. Or at least study the 'Abstract'. There is a causal chain. And you have to figure out 'where' the chain is weak if at all. The chain is like: significant amount of intermediate / non classical monocytes found in those patients--->those monocytes contain the S1 sub-unit---->are capable of causing inflammation throughout the body. The chain starts here: So it starts with a P value of P<0.002. This means the chances being a random constellation is < 0.2%. What's also interesting is that it plays no role in severe COVID....it seems PASC / long haulers do not get rid of that S1 sub-unit. What I have posted is right. But it does not mean that a vaccine that would encode for the N protein would not work. Each AB that binds to the virus flags the virus to be killed / eaten up. BUT if you bind to the nucleocapsid only then the S-protein which IS the door-opener is still unoccupied and could enter a cell until being eaten up by for instance macrophages. Or did I miss something? The N-protein encompasses the single-threaded mRNA.
Proteic contamination of AstraZeneca I share with you a recent publication (DOI: 10.21203 / rs.3.rs-477964 / v1), written by researchers at the University of Ulm, in Germany and which is currently in pre-print on Research Square (https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-477964/v1) It is a very relevant study since they describe the presence of non-ignorable amounts of contaminating molecules in three vials of Astrazeneca vaccines. As you know, Astrazeneca's COVID vaccine is based on the use of chimpanzee adenovirus as a vector. That virus has been modified so that it 1) cannot make copies of itself, and 2) contains the genetic information of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein. Vaccines must be purified in an adequate way so that they do not contain contaminants that could be harmful to those who receive them. This purification must eliminate any residue from the cells in which the copies of the vector adenovirus are produced, as well as any element that was added to the cell cultures. However, the researchers found high amounts of non-structural viral proteins (including SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein that is not present within the vaccine for any reason) in addition to human proteins (such as actin, heat shock proteins, and other proteins). chaperones). The authors conclude that the adverse effects that are occurring after vaccination with Astrazeneca can also be explained in the context of these contaminants. In particular, the generation of cerebral venous thrombi, and they propose that they could also generate long-term immune reactions (in particular given the fact that the inoculated would be receiving human protein fragments, which could lead to autoimmune reactions. I have already explained in various texts and talks Spike's action on the vascular endothelium, and his involvement in what leads to the condition known as severe COVID-19. The fact that they have found these contaminants implies that there is even more risk in these vaccines of pro-inflammatory, pro-clotting and autoimmune effects. It is worrying that these vaccines have been authorized by emergency and have this evidence of a very poor purification process. The authorization agencies have the obligation to verify that the content of the vaccines does not differ from what the pharmaceutical company reports, in addition to carrying out quality controls that avoid problems in those who receive the inoculations. In Japan, people have already died after the application of Moderna vaccines due to the presence of contaminants, and millions of doses have had to be withdrawn due to the risk that this implies. The agencies of the various countries that authorized the vaccines for emergencies, have nothing to answer? Could it be that they can present to the public their analysis of quality control evaluation and the determination of the ingredients of the vaccines that has been made by them prior to authorization? There is no way to justify this negligence. I hope you find this information useful and I send you my regards, Karina AW https://t.me/akashacomunidad/536
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/ne...dlN_mkKMA10Fq_oJiDB6YiOl_hZrpZTRImg6rAkbtgcjs A 4-year-old Galveston County girl got a fever. She died of COVID a few hours later, in her sleep As of last Wednesday, 321 children with COVID-19 were hospitalized statewide in Texas. "She died the day after her mother tested positive for the virus. By then, her brother and 5-month-old sister were infected too."
Ars Technica: Tension over boosters rises as FDA regulators quit and publicly blast Biden’s plan. https://arstechnica.com/science/202...s-booster-plan-after-announcing-resignations/ CBN News: FDA Warns Don't Vax Your Kids, Yet: 'Children Are Not Small Adults'. https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/202...x-your-kids-yet-children-are-not-small-adults Contagionlive.com: mRNA Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Differ in Antibody Response. https://www.contagionlive.com/view/mrna-vaccines-against-sars-cov-2-differ-in-antibody-response Business Insider: More than 243,000 kids got COVID-19 last week in the US. https://www.businessinsider.com/kid...a-second-highest-weekly-total-pandemic-2021-9
It's up to the reader. There isn't black or white, papers are subject of different assessments and therefore subject for debates. This is btw utterly missing in recent pandemic. There are 'scientists' mostly working in public health authorities who think to have owned the only right way to interpret things... For me it is causal. S1 subunit is pathogen. The only question is how are the vaccines involved in regards to adverse events making that S1, too.... Without a proper autopsy this is no news for me I'd respect. Could have been SIDS or whatever... come on..this is soap opera journalism. Guess how many children are dying because of starving while I am writing this post... Each death of a family member comes with individual suffering and each death is tragic...but to use it to fear monger and distort the severity of COVID-19 at kids is ridiculous and click bait journalism. Vaccines are not indicated for healthy kids. COVID-19 is not severe at healthy kids. And there is absolutely no long term data of future adverse events of the vaccines in kids. To administer an EUA gene based vaccine to kids..well...not me. And "getting COVID" should be no extra headline anymore. Everybody sooner or later will get it. Also the kids and the vaxxed. The point is not getting severe....