Why don't you stop evading questions and compare deaths from C-19 with deaths from vaccinations?!? For starters... You know, you allegedly not being biased and all...
I post studies AND my interpretation, yes. But only the latter can be biased by myself, therefore I always post the link for own assessments. Simple. There are people for those the vaccines do more harm than good. And how much benefit they really had is still unclear. Have you ever noticed that they always speak about effectiveness on this and that and almost not about safety related events? It might turn out that the vaccines caused harm and causally by COVID is not that much different and might exceed those of COVID at special age groups. That is possible. The data available from the vaccine makers are just not made to get safety related data! The real picture of the vaccines is getting worse and worse....
Sure I notice and I take a critical stand to it all - but with you of late it's just pushing one side of the story...
I have no idea in advance what exactly I do post about COVID...I get inspired by MSM, but then I try to get studies about. I am sorry it's recently in many news. "The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of the Covid Data It Collects The agency has withheld critical data on boosters, hospitalizations and, until recently, wastewater analyses." https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/20/...tion=click&module=RelatedLinks&pgtype=Article Furthermore when there is a new study which confirms an idea I had already before I know my way of thinking was right. I never thought that -the vaccines will be sterilizing (and hence end the pandemic) -the mRNA / Spike would only last 48h (sorry I know that they incorporated pseudouridine) -the imprinting would not be an issue (when you trigger an immune system that has been primed by an old variant it takes time until the 'old' AB-making is changed) And I also can recognize where I was wrong... But feel free to add what you think is the missing part when I post.
What is also "recently is the news" is thousands of deaths daily, in a single country - but not a single word of that from you and antivaxxing lobby, too... What is also in the news is that the current rate of abolishing measures in some countries is opposed by many in the scientific and medical community, plus some governments - not a word about that, either... The only thing we hear from you, as well as the antivaxxing lobby (I do not put you in there! BUT I see you effectively in the same bed, sadly), is "kill the measures", "No to vaccines" (I agree it should not be obligatory and administered only after consultations with one's GP) etc. etc. You are pushing and pushing and pushing one-sidedly, @Yen. That makes you significantly biased! That much is obvious and objective, I think!
Onesidedly, yes. It means from my side / perspective. Anyway I absolutely don't have any conflict of interests! Most others out there have huge conflicts of interests! The reason why I am for instance pro drug and pro early treatment and rather against a mass vaccination / vaccine approach originates solely from my interpretation of studies. I do not have any personal monetary benefit being pro for this and con for that. In other words I post what I think is right with references to sources. And my personal behavior is conform to what I post. (I take it for granted and I rely on it.) So why am I 'against' the vaccines? Because I have reasons for that. (Sources which are justifying that) I had recommended them for the vulnerable ones only. So to my dad for instance. And absolutely not for people below the age of 30 years. And no kids! ATM since Omicron and the fact that all those vaccines are still old I would not recommended them at all for now.
Most others are doctors and scientists who only have general interest at heart - if they are good people...
Here is a Japanese study saying BA.2 is more pathogenic (especially more fusogenic), although in hamsters. (From that study I suppose there comes the wish BA.2 should get another Greek letter). So finally a study which would reason an idea of BA.2 being eventually more virulent. But TBH a hamster study in vitro is actually more inappropriate than a in vitro study of human cell cultures.... But they also mentioned: The difference in antigenicity was not observed, therefore no new letter is justified....I suppose See yourself... https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.14.480335v1
Good morning Where can I buy the medicament paxlovid, pfizer laboratory without prescription in France please ? In fact, pharmacies refuse to sell it to me without prescription. Thank you very much for your help. Have a good sunday.
Sorry for the late reply. Recent news on the war kept me shocking. Check the inventor's page (R/D) whether you find all the answers to your questions. https://www.berlincures.de/en/ It showed impressing effect at all treated people (compassionate use CU for treating LCS in Erlangen). It's actually developed to fight a special kind of heart failure. (Caused by autoantibodies against G protein-coupled receptors.) It helps if LCS is also in relation to / caused by autoantibodies against G protein-coupled receptors. They think it's the case at 90% of all people suffering from LCS. (A blood test beforehand can clarify that). They try to get EUA and / or approval for a larger phase 2a study this quarter. If you have further questions I try to answer them. But their page should answer most of what you might want to know. Paxlovid has emergency use authorisation only and therefore it is controlled and it is only available by prescription. It's still experimental and self-administration due to the experimental state is not indicated. (Its administration should be closely monitored). But it should be no problem to ask a physician in case of COVID to eventually get a prescription.
La Ética Profesional a Juicio - Dra. Karina Acevedo-Whitehouse - Dr. Luis Benito (22-02-2022) https://odysee.com/@akashacomunidad:0/KAW20220222:6
Suck this NSW Government Admits to Using 'Skewed Data' Spoiler Nothing to be shocked of. Known since the beginning of this farce.
Let me put here some scientific works related to LCS and GPCR-AAbs and the potential cure BC007. BTW: This might also apply to post vaccine syndrome! General info "G Protein Coupled Receptors" https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/g-protein-coupled-receptors Early findings: "Functional autoantibodies against G-protein coupled receptors in patients with persistent Long-COVID-19 symptoms" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8049853/ The case report (Erlangen) "Case Report: Neutralization of Autoantibodies Targeting G-Protein-Coupled Receptors Improves Capillary Impairment and Fatigue Symptoms After COVID-19 Infection" https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.754667/full The German govt. funding "reCOVer": "BMBF provides 6.5 million euros in funding for research into Long COVID" https://www.fau.eu/2021/09/28/news/...uros-in-funding-for-research-into-long-covid/ This is very exciting and aptamers (to which BC007 belongs) are fascinating substances to bind to specific regions (here to GPCR-AAbs). Who can do the labs (blood test)? https://www.celltrend.de/en/pots-cfs-me-sfn/ The inventor itself: https://www.berlincures.de/downloads/downloads/Berlin-Cures-Consent-Form-LongCovid-EN-20211118.pdf BTW: There could be also a research project to find aptamers that bind for instance to the S protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. (passive immunization)
OK, something different, rather shocking since it might add another evidence for gain of function manipulation. There is a bat coronavirus which is named RaTG13. It is very similar to SARS-COV-2. (96.2%) Besides of (natural) point mutation differences there is: "Among numerous point mutation differences between the SARS-CoV-2 and the bat RaTG13 coronavirus, only the 12-nucleotide furin cleavage site (FCS) exceeds 3 nucleotides. A BLAST search revealed that a 19 nucleotide portion of the SARS.Cov2 genome encompassing the furin cleavage site is a 100% complementary match to a codon-optimized proprietary sequence that is the reverse complement of the human mutS homolog (MSH3)." What does that mean? Within the furin cleavage site there is found a PROPRIETARY sequence! The reverse complement of MSH3. When searching for the corresponding DNA sequence one finds SEQ ID11652 which is found in the US patent 9,587,003 filed on Feb. 4, 2016. Overexpression of MSH3 is known to interfere with mismatch repair. (Therefore carcinogenicity). The furin cleavage site is a functional part to cleave off the S1 from the S2 unit. (Via TMPRSS2) By allowing that (gaining this function) the virus becomes capable of cell surface fusion! So is RaTG13 the real ancestor of SARS-COV-2 which has been obtained by gain of function research in the Wuhan labs? -added a carcinogenic attribute, by adding a proprietary sequence? -added the function to perform cell surface fusion, the furin cleavage site and by that unlocking the major barrier for cross-species transmission of infection? https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fviro.2022.834808/full This is explosive stuff! "The presence in SARS-CoV-2 of a 19-nucleotide RNA sequence encoding an FCS at amino acid 681 of its spike protein with 100% identity to the reverse complement of a proprietary MSH3 mRNA sequence is highly unusual. Potential explanations for this correlation should be further investigated." Additional link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC7833556/ The 'first' works I've found: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bies.202000240
That BLAST database research that allows to find that proprietary sequence (Figure2) leads to US patent 9,587,003 https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US9587003 Guess what? It belongs to Moderna. Moderna is a company which fully originates from US govt institutions. The hypothesis that Fauci cooperated with the Chinese in Wuhan for gain of function reaserch gets another 'reason'...
"Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line" https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm This means the genetic info of the Pfizer vaccine (how to make the spike protein of the virus) becomes a part of one's DNA (liver cells). And that quite fast (6h). What that means for the future..? Just another new scientific finding. What's impressing: Many statements that had been assigned to 'conspiracy adherents' seem to be finally true. It's hard to deny that SARS-COV-2 comes from a lab. And now a mechanism that is actually hardly possible "REVERSE transcription". Remember the people being afraid that mRNA can change human DNA? I also said it can only work if you find reverse transcriptase. That highly probable would not happen. BUT: What most people seem to have forgotten is a simple principle in science. You have to get evidence by experiment that something does not happen to say it does not happen. You explicitly need to have a look at it by doing experiments that can give answers. But this practice is abandoned just like proper science has been abandoned at this pandemic. Things are just claimed by 'experts' without experiments. This MUST be tested before any vaccine can be administered to humans!!!!
This is sooo nefarious ! So conspiracy theory about global benocide is becoming true. And anyone who dares to criticize or even question any official narrative, mass media starts to tag as conspiranoid, denier and anti-vaxxer. Even to well known and highly reputation scientist on the field. Moreover, colleagues themselves activate their Sheeple mode and attack them too!
The point at this pandemic is: 'They' said / claimed: -No it cannot come from a lab. (OK to me it was plausible it came from an animal host. I was fooled.) -No a mRNA cannot transcribe to DNA and becomes inserted there. (I knew it's unlikely anyway it has to be proven IN ADVANCE it cannot.) -The vaccines are safe. The short development time is compensated by experiences on this field. (I knew this is not true, own experiences on R/D.) -The vaccines protect from getting sick and the vaccines protect from being contagious to others. AKA the vaccines are causing sterilizing immunity. (I know that would not happen since it is reasonable that the vaccines would not induce IgA) They claimed without to know! And THAT is making them unreliable.