Global leaders unite in urgent call for international pandemic treaty https://www.who.int/news/item/30-03...urgent-call-for-international-pandemic-treaty I hadn't read this before. Kinda old it is from March 21, 2021. And we still calling a conspiracy theory the power of global governance of these psychopaths... Translated to reality: With such a great diplomacy, we all world citizens will be forced to get the injection and other health "measures" or GET A SHOT in the forehead.
Me, too - lots of death and suffering - thanx to moronic people electing their class enemies to "rule in their name", thanx to believing those who want to exploit and dominate them and nothing else... One thing is for sure: MrX CERTAINLY does NOT have the "panoramic view", neither by education, nor by general ability, nor by general proclivities towards "believing", rather than researching critically...
What is vaccine shedding and should I be concerned about it? https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/resources/what-is-vaccine-shedding/ When I lay back on my chair and mind goes up to the stratosphere you know, to have a panoramic view of the greater picture, I see that this never ever happened before in human history. The coronavirus, the vaccines, the measures yet: 1. I don't see any well-being for humanity 2. I only see death and s**t happening around the world. All of them, events and solutions, seem to be carefully orchestrated to detriment of human population. The powerful are killing the powerless poor... Yes that's my take on all this.
‘Unbelieve’ the lie: Florida surgeon general says masks ‘never’ saved lives during pandemic https://www.wfla.com/news/politics/...says-masks-never-saved-lives-during-pandemic/
**REMOVED 2nd study. Did not pass peer-review*** Source: "Ivermectin Prophylaxis Used for COVID-19: A Citywide, Prospective, Observational Study of 223,128 Subjects Using Propensity Score Matching" https://www.cureus.com/articles/82162 In this large study, regular use of ivermectin as a prophylactic agent was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates. As being said at the beginning already. The suppression of ivermectin caused excess of COVID deaths and tons of avoidable suffering. A real crime on humanity in the name of profit making.
OK, I just found out from a doctor that A.Z. is no longer given here, in the UK - for a while now... Also, they are giving Pfizer and Moderna (if it is available) to kids... And that's all. Which ones would you consider safe(er) for kids, of everything, all the C-19 vaccines we have, @Yen?!? The Cuban vaccine is given to almost all... We heard nothing of potential downsides... Any clues? Moderna is also "loose" with facts, when it comes to potential for side-effects, do you know anything specific re. kids, please? I now have a decision to make and it's daunting... The doctor I spoke to also agrees with me, that Pfizer first dose carries some risk... Immediately, she rightly points out that the risk is significantly lower than C-19 and esp. "long Covid in kids"! And she says "We have plenty of long C-19 in kids and we do not know exactly why!" (So, this risk from Pf vaccines is smaller than risks posed by getting infected by C-19 or getting long Covid - but that there is a risk higher than some other vaccines... In other words, these assessments are always "relative to...")
I am sorry, you won't get any assessment on this since I do not want to be a part of somebody's decision making on the subject "which COVID vaccine for kids". You'd have to trust your paediatrician. My professional assessment is it's strictly contraindicated.
I didn't ask you to make a decision for me - c'mon, man... - but for DATA re. Moderna and side-effects, esp. in kids, if you have any data... Besides, your serious concerns seem unfounded: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-60653946?at_custom2=twitter&at_custom1=[post+type]&at_custom4=BEE6F5DC-9E7D-11EC-9B6B-83FA4744363C&at_campaign=64&at_medium=custom7 Covid vaccines not linked to deaths, major US study finds IMAGE SOURCE,REUTERS A major study of vaccine side-effects in the US found no link between two Covid jabs and the number of deaths recorded after vaccination. The Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said 92% of reported side-effects after the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were mild. About 4,500 people died after being vaccinated, in the US, up to June 2021. But no unusual patterns in the data were detected that might suggest a link to the vaccine itself. Study author Dr Tom Shimabukuro said: "[It's] reassuring that reactions to both mRNA vaccines are generally mild and subside after one or two days - confirming reports from clinical trials and post-authorisation monitoring." Heart inflammation Researchers looked at "adverse events" from nearly 300 million vaccine doses given in the US between December 2020 and June 2021. Members of the public, healthcare providers and drug companies can report any possible side-effect, using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), run by the CDC and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). A second method, V-safe, allows individuals to fill out a survey on their smartphone in the months after after vaccination. Both systems rely on individuals deciding to self-report an adverse event. The results of the study are published in the Lancet medical journal: From the VAERS data, the CDC received more than 340,000 reports of adverse events after vaccination, with 92% registered as mild The most common side effects were headaches, fatigue, fever and chills Of the more than 22,000 events recorded as serious, the most common was shortness of breath Other serious events, including a form of heart inflammation known as myocarditis, have already been identified following both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccinations, although that side-effect is very rare. Because Covid jabs were originally authorised in the United States under emergency-use provisions, healthcare providers are required to report all deaths following vaccination, whether a doctor suspects a "plausible" link or not. About 4,500 deaths were recorded in the six months to June 2021, more than 80% among people aged 60 and over. Death rates "The rapid pace at which Covid-19 vaccines were administered under emergency use, especially among older populations, was unprecedented," the CDC's Dr David Shay said. "Due to their age, this group already has a higher baseline mortality rate than the general population and our results follow similar patterns of death rates for people in this age group following other adult vaccinations." The researchers said less than 1% of people who filled out the V-safe survey had sought any medical care following vaccination. Dr Elizabeth Phillips, a professor of medicine, at Vanderbilt University, who was not involved in the study, said: "Reassuringly, the six-month VAERS data supports that - although approximately one in 1,000 individuals vaccinated may have an adverse effect, most of these are non-serious. "For adverse events of special interest, it is reassuring that there were no unexpected [safety] signals other than myocarditis and anaphylaxis, already known to be associated with mRNA vaccines." Lancet article: "Summary Background In December, 2020, two mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines were authorised for use in the USA. We aimed to describe US surveillance data collected through the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a passive system, and v-safe, a new active system, during the first 6 months of the US COVID-19 vaccination programme. Methods In this observational study, we analysed data reported to VAERS and v-safe during Dec 14, 2020, to June 14, 2021. VAERS reports were categorised as non-serious, serious, or death. Reporting rates were calculated using numbers of COVID-19 doses administered as the denominator. We analysed v-safe survey reports from days 0–7 after vaccination for reactogenicity, severity (mild, moderate, or severe), and health impacts (ie, unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, or received care from a medical professional). Findings During the study period, 298 792 852 doses of mRNA vaccines were administered in the USA. VAERS processed 340 522 reports: 313 499 (92·1%) were non-serious, 22 527 (6·6%) were serious (non-death), and 4496 (1·3%) were deaths. Over half of 7 914 583 v-safe participants self-reported local and systemic reactogenicity, more frequently after dose two (4 068 447 [71·7%] of 5 674 420 participants for local reactogenicity and 4 018 920 [70·8%] for systemic) than after dose one (4 644 989 [68·6%] of 6 775 515 participants for local reactogenicity and 3 573 429 [52·7%] for systemic). Injection-site pain (4 488 402 [66·2%] of 6 775 515 participants after dose one and 3 890 848 [68·6%] of 5 674 420 participants after dose two), fatigue (2 295 205 [33·9%] participants after dose one and 3 158 299 participants [55·7%] after dose two), and headache (1 831 471 [27·0%] participants after dose one and 2 623 721 [46·2%] participants after dose two) were commonly reported during days 0–7 following vaccination. Reactogenicity was reported most frequently the day after vaccination; most reactions were mild. More reports of being unable to work, do normal activities, or of seeking medical care occurred after dose two (1 821 421 [32·1%]) than after dose one (808 963 [11·9%]); less than 1% of participants reported seeking medical care after vaccination (56 647 [0·8%] after dose one and 53 077 [0·9%] after dose two). Interpretation Safety data from more than 298 million doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine administered in the first 6 months of the US vaccination programme show that most reported adverse events were mild and short in duration."
If this is an obvious truth in your mid then I wonder why you are still asking which vaccine is best for kids. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.25.22271454v1 Waned quickly from 68% to 12 % from December 13th to January 30th at kids of 12-17 years. Waned to 11% at kids 11 years of age. For children 5-11, VE against cases declined from 65% (95% CI: 62%, 68%) to 12% (95% CI: 8%, 16%) by 28-34 days. Not to speak of the fact of adverse events! And the lack of data of long term influence on kids' development of immune system. Have you ever thought that the only benefit to vaccinate kids is only a psychological phenomenon of adult's mind? And if one still suffers from that irrational idea to let vaccinate the kids to have a better own feeling.... The more conventional the vaccines are the safer they should be. No Moderna, no Pfizer, no Sputnik, no J&J, no AZ. Attenuated virus or protein based vaccines. And never forget, the main pathology of SARS-COV-2 comes by the S protein which is major part at all mRNA based vaccines. The others (fully attenuated / inactivated virus) at least provide the entire virus just as a natural infection does. Just want to repeat: Vaccination of kids is not indicated. It's your own choice.
Don't talk nonsense, m8: I only saw this article after I asked the question. C'mon, you can do this, don't do this "below the belt" cr@p... Still, Moderna also lied about the side-effects? Do you know? Besides, you do remember I raised Cuba's vaccine Q... So, I am not altogether naive, you know...
I am very sensitive when it comes to vaccination of kids against COVID as you know... Tomorrow I'll try to get more info. At least it's what I can do. Moderna was not noticeable with such bad news as Pfizer (issues at study, manipulating of results), anyway it's the same kind of vaccine. (mRNA). The question is, though, was Moderna just cleverer? Many nations stopped Moderna for men below the age of 30 years anyway!! The adult vaccine of Moderna has 100µg of mRNA, Pfizer has 30µg. TBH I don't know much about the Cuba vaccine, except that they did their own and AFAIK they had more than one candidate? I'll also try to get more infos on that. The available data set for kids is even a lot less...this applies to all the vaccines.
There is no special vaccine for kids from Moderna. The recommended dose for kids is half (50µg). Pfizer has an own brand for kids (orange cap), the dose is 10µg. This is an immense difference!!! (5 times). Pfizer has been most administered for kids, therefore you will find more adverse events at Pfizer. Pfizer's VE wanes very quickly and is actually gone after one month at kids (study above). I suppose they wanted to be more on the safety side on the costs of VE There is a simple rational correlation: The lower the dose the lower the (adverse) events / effects. The Cuba vaccine SOBERANA 02 (FINLAY-FR-2) is very interesting. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.31.21265703v2.full-text https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.01.01.21268271v1.full-text SOBERANA 02 is a COVID-19 conjugate vaccine (recombinant RBD conjugated to tetanus toxoid). Therefore it's an unique kind of vaccine. It's protein based but a conjugate. It's a vaccine that has the RBD portion of the S protein only. This means it's (probably) the only vaccine that hasn't the entire S protein in it. It's conform to the first candidate of Pfizer BNT162b1 which never has been released to the public. (It also codes only for the RBD portion). So concerning spike toxicity this vaccine would be best since it does not provide the whole spike. Since it's a conjugate it's reported less efficacy at those vaccinated with the same kind (also tetanus tox conjugate) already. Soberana 01 has another conjugate (not the tetanus tox), a sugar from a meningitis-causing bacterium as the conjugate. SOBERANA Plus is the SARS-CoV-2 RBD-dimer alone, which should work as booster They have: SOBERANA 01 (conjugate 1) SOBERANA 02 (conjugate 2) SOBERANA Plus (booster) https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-03470-x https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-03025-0
MUCH OBLIGED, M8!!!!!! It would take me ages to get all that and probably wouldn't get it all, anyhow... But it deffo sends me down a safer path! Esp. if it is required to travel to Germany (soon to visit family there) and Croatia for hols in Summer... Booster dose is after 12 weeks, I think, so we just about make it with that... Cheers! P.S. I keep kicking my darling's butt to go to Cuba but she wouldn't listen, heh...
The vaccine from Cuba is really interesting. It would avoid to get the entire S protein into human body only the RBD (ReceptorBindingDomain) of it. This also excludes the eventually manipulated furin cleavage site. But AFAIK it has no EUA yet here...you still would be considered as unvaxxed ATM. I myself would not let vaccinate own kids against COVID, rather to go for additional IVM, though. (Just I did that for myself.) Here is an interesting read: "Ivermectin and the Price of Life " A must read for everybody who is always interested in the whole picture: https://www.thedesertreview.com/opi...cle_3e1a2e14-5c70-11ec-b6f4-2b146e98a0b5.html It's not easy as one has to decide for another individual (own kid), something completely different as to make an own (adult) decision. Anyway wish you the best to make the right decision for your kids.
Here's some interesting reading regarding Covid-19. There's 150 files released by Pfizer in response to the FOIA act filed against them. https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/ And here's a link to the court documents. https://phmpt.org/court-documents/ Court Order: .
@Yen, if we are to go to Germany, see the family, according to the current rules, we would have to isolate for 8 days, if not vaccinated, I think, hence a wasted trip - ergo no option but to get vaccinated and that Pf stuff seems the only option, then. I read a lot and saw the Cuban effort, I mean everybody from 2 years of age upwards, I think, is now vaccinated and from what I managed to find - no adverse effects... But hey, I am not a pro...