If we need more or fewer masks, more physical distancing or more 'fraternising', more of the same old same old or learning new skills, fewer resources gone into C-19, where people frequently die on their watch or more of good equipment to protect them, more staff to share the burden - so they can go back to cancer, brain surgery and whatever else they normally do or...?!?!?!? Any "bright idea" that does not include them, how they are right now, what they feel, their limits and so on - is a BAD "theory"...
You talk about forceing the rest of society to do what you want how you want when you want .......... and stigmatising people that you dont understand ........ demanding enforcement and punishment ...... just like a jehovas witness ........ but dont manage to get as far as seeing who it would effect and how ? = If it comes to a situation where governments crack down on people who cause trouble ......... sabotaging society ...... by twisting things trying to score ego points ...... and spreading lies , ignorance , connfusion and panic ........... you and people like you will be the first to be rounded up , gagged and punished .
I am sorry but you really have no clue... Get some help, m8... Either with elementary logic or perhaps something stronger.... maybe even emotional, I don't know.... but this is really.... ehhh.... And if you are trying to be "funny" - well, don't, you really don't have the minimal talent needed, trust me on this one....
That's their job. And they could do it far more easy if even 'the authorities' had made their job rightly before corona. It's almost political hypocrisy.....they show now such pictures, make people to create 'empathy' and they promise support...and later they get nothing at all. They simply don't have enough personal. It has its cause in the past by bad health politics.....and you have seen and will see such pictures at every wave of infections. The difference is that there is no media caring about and hence nobody else, too. I mean why do people now create an empathy for those people who do save lives their entire life? Why not at Ebola, why not at SARS? Why not at other humanity concerning rescue? You cannot conjure up more personal. First you need to pay them reasonable that their job attracts more people....and then you need to invest time for proper qualification / training... But creating pseudo empathy by media at any corona wave does not help to get things better.
You are actually right. I am still convinced no measure is effective enough to stop the virus. No vaccine will end the pandemic. I support the theory that SARSCoV-2 follows its common cold brothers. SARSCOV-2 will become the 5th brother of the common cold corona viruses, since it seems to follow the same history. OC-43 for instance highly probably caused the Russian 'flu' 130 years ago and is now cc. One theory is that once the t-cells know about it (long term immunity part, obtained already from other corona viruses / has to be gained by first t-cell encountering) and antibody level is on plateau, you can get a second infection. But this one will be then more like a common cold. I assume those who get remarkable symptoms at COVID-19 are those training their t-cell response the first time to coronaviruses. But finally COVID-19 will be an integrated part of human viruses which causes the one or other wave next years...the overall symptoms do naturally weaken during time though. I don't have a reason to think why COVID-19 should behave different than its brothers...
Again ---- > There is no problem .......... because if we had one we would solve it ? ......... and we dont solve it = We havent got a problem ? A large part of us surviving evil-ution was cooperation . Untill we have world cooperation we wont solve the problem . Same with the climate cacktastrophy = Untill the 4 dictators of the world give up their greed and ' US first ' fascho s**t we wont solve our problems . When enough people die public opinion will change and the public will take it seriously and do whats needed . At the moment all we have is ignorance , confusion , denyal , infotainment , exploitation ......... and exercises in public control .
ScienceAlert: Brain Scans Show a Whole Spectrum of COVID-19 Abnormalities We Can't Fully Explain. https://www.sciencealert.com/how-covid-disturbs-brain-waves
will be waiting a long time because that will never happen....the only thing waiting for humanity at the end of the road is death.
This report is actually of no use / help. But I'd get very useful in even two ways at once. You need to clearly find out why this person and / or a few others and not more. When got is (the differences) you can help the affected ones at best and you get it clear how it is related to COVID-19. I assume it'd be not easy since it is probably viral load dependent and I am not sure if there is an available way to measure it.
Oh, dear... "Nah, it's nothing, these measures are crazy, we must go back to living as before, we need herd immunity, in fact we already almost have it, it's less deadly than the flu, it's just as infectious as a flu, it's milder than the flu...." None of it is factually correct. All of it put in public health policy means playing Russian roulette with people's lives.... It doesn't take the NHS into consideration at all and yet.... Moreover: the more we know the worse it looks for MANY people.... But they are just not "enough" to get some people thinking... or feeling... or both... I certainly don't think we should be so "cavalier" with other or our own lives or health - we should err on the side of caution! And "herd immunity" is a BONKERS idea, close to criminal, if you know what we now know and yet...
Why are you upset? Herd Immunity whatever you or I do mean is hypothetical. Only Sweden has this approach. Everybody else in Europe has restrictions.... My suggestion to determine the difference is quite reasonable. When you have values of others who don't have this abnormality and you can compare you could find a significant difference. They (the pros) could evaluate if adjusting is practicable and makes sense. This I cannot do. The approach is: The difference can be a factor that is responsible for the abnormality. And they could even act BEFORE those symptoms are developing or maybe slow down or even curing. I would not hesitate to ask for that at the pros. And if they'd say. BS makes no sense, I would say what a pity, but not for me.
You have never heard of the UK? Perhaps you should inform yourself a bit better. How about the US? Brazil? .... Never mind...
Btw, we should ALL be "upset"!!! Maybe then we shall do what we need to do. And yes, there are measures that can stop it. If only we weren't screwed up with money, possessions, amassing.... Oh, wait - don't you talk about the ego as the big con and a downer for Humanity? Well, DRAW THE RIGHT CONCLUSIONS!!!
R = 2 in London. When would you act, Yen? When would you actually take reality into consideration?!? What does it take? Look who you are in bed with: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...as-with-covid-lockdown-in-england-experts-say
@ Brain dead crap ---- > ScienceAlert: Brain Scans Show a Whole Spectrum of COVID-19 Abnormalities We Can't Fully Explain. That is not science .
I am drawing the right conclusions. There isn't yet and was no measure to stop it. There is no nation that is free of COVID-19. The measures did cause a delay at best case. I can spot avoidable cases. Those who could not get the right treatment in time because of lacking of capacity. Avoidable because some did not apply those measures to delay in time. Avoidable because raise of capacity / personal was not planed in time. A differentiation of the attributes itself of the pandemic and what could have been avoided /can we do better is mandatory. When you have an 'out of sight out of my mind' ideology in your mind you can do it bad two ways: You can do nothing and ignore it (Trump) or you can do something that is not practicable long term and causes more harm than it helps. We have to accept that there is a second wave and we have to deal with that fact. We have to develop strategies where we can live with periods of higher infections. We have to get familiar with the idea that there will be probably no vaccine that stops the pandemic. Delay and slowdown at best case here as well. And if you like it to hear or not. It's not right to lockdown, it's right to go for active protection of vulnerable groups. You can do quick tests before visiting retirement homes (could be done right before the visit) and far more like that. You can apply own measures, social distancing. You need to intervene there where a 'jump' of the virus may cause fatalities. The strategy to trace infection paths has failed due to the high amount of numbers and cases. The numbers say nothing about virulence. To follow any path anyway has eaten up all the resources As result there is no working strategy left. I am no adherent of the 2. lockdown. Anyway Germany will get the next lockdown next Monday. Not the same as we had, but quite restrictive. By trying to delay you also delay the 'problem' as long as you don't have new active strategies which are really practicable to reduce / avoid fatalities. The study is a scientific study. But to categorize the results further research (as they also mentioned) is needed.
>The study is a scientific study. mengele did scientific studys ? = Just because something gets labled as a scientific study it doesnt mean that its correct or relevant ........ or real science . It doesnt say anything that we didnt know before = We diont know and we need more information . The ' study ' itself says that . Its not a study . Its not a study about corona . IF its a study its a study about other studys . Those studys are not real statistical studys because they dont have enough participants in any of them ...... and they're throwing the results together . This is not science ---- > ' In their review, the researchers collated data on nearly 620 COVID-positive patients from 84 studie ' Its also only about people with covid ........ many of who already had brain or other health problems ........ and its talking about long term effect after only a few months . Did those people have those effects from covid ? Did they have ECGs before and after ? The only reason the people had the brain scans was because they had covid and problems .......... but did those problems come from covid ?
Yes correlation does not mean causality. (And AFAIK already fewer alters brain waves) Furthermore if you are keen on finding such studies you will find it. This applies to other illnesses as well. I don't belong to those picking up such a study, take it out of context and take it for granted. I suggested 'differentiation' to others... If it should get any significance more journals will report about that.