On "boot.wim\index2\sources\" and "ISO:\Sources\" (19044.1387.211119-1335.21H2_RELEASE_SVC_PROD3_CLIENT_X64FRE_NL-NL_LTSC.iso) it's 1266 but in DU for Sources (windows10.0-kb5007402-x64_DU_Sources_1371.cab) it's 1271.
Hi Please help me. What is the best way and the most stable method for Activation Windows 10 LTSC 21H2 x64 ? I'm not an expert. please help me.
Enthousiast, thank you for everything you've done here. I've read all 53 pages (eyes burning, lol!). Do you have a recommendation on the 'best' LTSC 2021 IoT HWID activator? KMS_VL_ALL was amazing for regular enterprise LTSC 2021
Afaik, KMS activation will turn IoT Enterprise 2021 LTSC into normal Enterprise 2021 LTSC, but HWID or KMS38 should work (check my sig).
while officially not supported, it is possible. you have to change the EditionID to EnterpriseS in HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion, then you can perform an in-place upgrade to LTSC. -andy-
the M$ trainees failed big time on this inconsistent pile of lousy code. a build is not a build anymore https://forums.mydigitallife.net/th...rprise-n-ltsc-2021.84509/page-39#post-1707347 https://forums.mydigitallife.net/th...rprise-n-ltsc-2021.84509/page-39#post-1707350 https://forums.mydigitallife.net/th...rprise-n-ltsc-2021.84509/page-41#post-1707492 https://forums.mydigitallife.net/th...rprise-n-ltsc-2021.84509/page-41#post-1707508 https://forums.mydigitallife.net/th...rprise-n-ltsc-2021.84509/page-43#post-1707668 https://forums.mydigitallife.net/th...rprise-n-ltsc-2021.84509/page-44#post-1707765 https://forums.mydigitallife.net/th...rprise-n-ltsc-2021.84509/page-46#post-1707953 https://forums.mydigitallife.net/th...rprise-n-ltsc-2021.84509/page-46#post-1707969 https://forums.mydigitallife.net/th...rprise-n-ltsc-2021.84509/page-47#post-1708037 https://forums.mydigitallife.net/th...rprise-n-ltsc-2021.84509/page-48#post-1708165
You are correct. These are not actual "builds", they are essentially "service packs". 1904{2,3,4} do not introduce new base files. They're all based on 19041 files. This means 19041 and the rest are effectively the same build ("build" as in "software build"), because all their updates and components rely on the same base (19041.1). I fail to see how that is a "problem" or a "bug" or really anything though..
@awuctl feel free to read the already posted infos, or search the web. there exist functions/features now rendered useless ...
I read them and you seem to be very confused by something completely normal. And now you're talking about "features" (whatever that's supposed to mean) without any explanation (screenshots, write ups, packages, […] or really anything) for what you said. The only thing you mention in those posts is how "19041" instead of "19044" (or any other build with EPs) is a bug, when it absolutely isn't. You're the person that's confused about build numbers, not me. Explain what you mean or stop bothering people with your non-problem.