They are called CUMULATIVE updates for a reason, you can update whichever ISO build to the latest CU w/o any problem, possibly starting from something other than xxxxx.1 could take a bit longer on W11 or recent W10 given how recent updates hare working. On the other hand is almost mandatory to use xxxxx.1 if you need to extract a package with sxsextract, or if you need to do fancy things like modding, removing/adding "unsupported" packages and so on. That said, updating the ISO, is a well worth practice for w7/w8/w81 and so on but on w10/w11, for a home user, is practically pointless. You spend your time updating an ISO that will be updated in less than 30 days anyway. Also here there is one exception: 1809 Its .1 release is buggy and really dangerous on in place upgrades, so having it updated at least to .165 is HIGHLY recommended.
17763.32 already had the "deletion of personal files in upgrade scenarios" fixed. Considering this is about 22000.xxx:
Ok, but irrelevant nitpick. The point is to use a fixed ISO on 1809, start with 32 or 165 or whatever different from first build, then you're going to apply the LCU anyway. Not sure what you're trying to say. To me looks like a reason more to avoid to waste your time updating the ISO first Your time will be better employed customizing the ISO, removing the crap from it, preinstalling the SW you need and so on, not doing something that requires no user action to be accomplished. PCs are supposed to be here to help humans (and to spare their time) not viceversa.
I know you like to continue to clutter this forum with your personal crappy opinions. Cripple all you want, stop enforcing this obsolete nonsense here.
According to the 3DMark SSD benchmark, there are a bunch of real world scenarios that faster SSDs can actually help, liked in loading games, saving game files, installing games etc.
Surely having a faster disk is better than having a slower disk, but above a certain threshold is more matter of winning pissing contests than practical advantages (not different than 4/8K TVs, one zillon of megapixels Cams/Cellphones and so on)
I replied to a message, that's all Perhaps monitors are PC peripherals just like NVME disks, so it has to do with win 11 at least as much as the NVME disks. If you don't care of my opinion just skip my messages, I'll sleep well anyway
I am unsure when it happened, but it has happened in the last few days. I have lost all my personal setting and tabs in the taskbar, and its reverted back to the basics. Anyone else seen this??????? EDIT. --- A check of usage sees the the computer CPU usage is thru the roof. A reboot sees everything back to normal. Problem fixed, please ignor.
EDIT: Sorry it's ok, i was comparing sha1 vs sha256 Thanks, but italian ISO hash doesn't match: Code: it-it_windows_11_consumer_editions_updated_dec_2021_x64_dvd_8fa9033c.iso 7e471909e4b3cae7256ea6eaedb711109fe3b3c511c2cdf864cbc2a04be32d26 Your patch Code: it-it_windows_11_consumer_editions_updated_dec_2021_x64_dvd_8fa9033c.exe Outputs: Code: 80E8FF19653C65E2ED8C80CD029FC4A51E18D75B
sorry for my stupid question,but I need 470dc5554ec4b39ff08fc4afa89c03fa03c9105a0d2dac2cbedad12b70e8ee2f *bg-bg_windows_11_consumer_editions_updated_dec_2021_x64_dvd_e27c4609.iso....... how can I download this iso?