LOL, maybe we should just wait until the OP returns and replies what he's looking for. He knows now that M$ does not provide it, but there are alternatives.
That too is probably open to different theological interpretation. IMHO, OP has been provided with ample info.
Wow, this escaladed quickly... All I wanted was a clean Enterprise ISO. If evaluation was the same (eg. same hash), then great, there is my answer. But if it isn't, I wanted to know if Microsoft, like it does for Home and Professional, somewhere else provided clean ISOs for Enterprise. As far I have read into this thread, unless you are a business customer, then the answer is no. And sure, I can find the english easy but I needed a couple (at least one) of languages. And yes, I know Windows 10 can switch languages but that is not want I need/want.
It includes the pro version, which when installing, the generic Enterprise key can be add and it only takes a few minutes for pro to switch to Enterprise. So if people are afraid to download from anyplace but Microsoft, they can download from Microsoft and have a Enterprise version. AGAIN : Windows pro can be updated to Enterprise when installing pro and a generic Enterprise key is entered during PRO install.
Yeah, I know. Pro > Enterprise or Education Core > pro or Education And he has just claimed that all he wants was a clean Enterprise ISO.
I ment a clean direct link. All I could find was chinese links, text files, etc. This is why I tried to make a repository for Windows 10. I'm sure that clean ISOs are not illegal or anything.
Not the most direct but it will have to do... Any reference page from Microsoft where to check checksums for the ISOs? MSDN is the only way?
don't make your life more complicated as it obviously is man: I copy and paste all MSDN text into my x-file section
Don't take offense by simple facts. A checksum provides a method of integrity verification between the person you get the checksum from and the downloader. So if you post checksums in your jukebox, then people downloading those magnets will know that the image has not been modified between you and them. It factually tells them nothing about whether the image has been modified between Microsoft and them. That requires trust in you because you are acting as the middleman. I'm not saying at all that you don't copy the checksums 1:1. After all, this forum is not SSL-secured, so even your post, which was originally 1:1 verbatim compared to Microsoft, might still be tampered with on the way to the user. You don't control the forum software or its servers or its Internet connection or the user's Internet connection, do you? So providing a means for users to verify checksums for themselves directly from Microsoft should be a no-brainer and no cause for taking offense. Your efforts are greatly appreciated and by no means is anyone saying you're not trustworthy. It's just better if you don't have to rely on trust in the first place if you can avoid it. It's simple IT security stuff, nothing personal.